Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt-shell command to move a disk

On 07/13/2016 10:30 AM, Jure Kranjc wrote: > On 01. 12. 2014 14:40, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote: >> Le 01/12/2014 13:23, Juan Hernández a écrit : >>> On 12/01/2014 12:51 PM, Michael Pasternak wrote: >>>> not sure what sdk version 3.4.4 is, but according to log, latest >>>> official for 3.4 is 3.4.1.1-1 >>>> (make you have it installed) >>>> >>> There are two issues here. First is that the "move" disk operation on >>> the top level collection isn't correctly documented in the RSDL >>> metadata. As a result the Python SDK and the CLI don't support this >>> operation. You can however use the same operation in the context of >>> the VM: >>> >>> # action disk {disk:id} move --vm-identifier {vm:id} >>> --storage_domain-name={storagedomain:name} >>> >>> Please open a bug requesting a fix for this. >> Done! >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169376 >> >>> The other issue is that the 3.4 version doesn't support specifying disks >>> by alias, only by id. This has been fixed in 3.5. >>> >>> So, all in all, at the moment you will need a command like this: >>> >>> # action disk c6aab66a-b551-4cc5-8628-efe9622c0dce move >>> --vm-identifier myvm --storage_domain-name mysd >> Your workaround is working : thank you. >> > Hi, > > i know this is an old thread but i need to move a bunch of disks from > one storage domain to another. I am unable to move disks with > ovirt-shell as it seems it does not support moving disks when quota > enabled and enforced on datacenter. Is that correct? Any help appreciated. > > ovirt shell > action disk 689ce8fe-0d40-47e1-a933-7bae5ed0812b move > --storage_domain-name NLSAS_PRIM > status: 400 > reason: Bad Request > detail: Cannot move Virtual Machine Disk. Quota is not valid. > > I can move disks normally via webadmin. > Using ovirt-engine-cli-3.6.2.0-1.fc23.noarch, > ovirt-engine-3.5.6.2-1.el6.noarch > Doron, Roy, internally the API uses the "MoveDisks" command to move the disks, and that action is marked as "QuotaDependency.STORAGE". Is that correct? Can you take a look?