Re: [Users] Fence-virt support

From: "Sander Grendelman" <sander(a)grendelman.com&gt; To: "Eli Mesika" <emesika(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: users(a)ovirt.org Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 4:25:16 PM Subject: Re: [Users] Fence-virt support On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Eli Mesika <emesika(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> - fence-virtd uses a keyfile, no username and password. > > This is a real problem , we are not supporting currently other > authentication methods Yes, It's probably going to take a bit of a hack to make this work with the current mechanism/gui because the key file has to be an actual _file_. I just made a local config + keyfile for my testnodes. > >> - fence-virtd uses port=vmname to identify a VM >> >> The gui has mandatory username and password fields and >> the standard port/sshport field only takes numeric values. > > For that we have the options field , you could omit the port from the fence > mapping and then add in the options "port=<value>" Yes that's what I did. One of the problems with that is that port= maps to the sshport field in the apc part of the gui which brings us back to BZ 1014513.

>> Some of the problems I ran into are probably related to >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020344 > > This is actually related to another BZ > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014513 > Yes, that's actually the one I meant but I couldn't find it.