[ovirt-users] Re: Failed to activate Storage Domain --- ovirt 4.2

Hi Nir Yes, the metadata was corrupted but the VMs were running OK. This master storage domain has increased its allocation significantly overnight and ran out the space limit and went to offline completely. The cluster was online and VMs were running OK but the affected Storage Domain went offline. I tired increase the storage domain but the Ovirt wasn’t allowing to expend the storage. Due to time constrain, I had restore the storage domain using Compellent snapshot. However, we need to prevent this happening again when Master storage Domain fill-up with the space. Currently, we have the following parameter set in the 5TB storage Domain. ID: 0e1f2a5d-a548-476c-94bd-3ab3fe239926 Size: 5119 GiB Available: 2361 GiB Used: 2758 GiB Allocated: 3104 GiB Over Allocation Ratio: 14% Images: 13 Warning Low Space Indicator: 10% (511 GiB) Critical Space Action Blocker: 5 GiB Please kindly advise what action needs to implement, so we can prevent this occurs again in the future. Thanks Aminur Rahman aminur.rahman@iongroup.com<mailto:aminur.rahman@iongroup.com> t +44 20 7398 0243<tel:+44%2020%207398%200243> m +44 7825 780697<tel:+44%207825%20780697%3c> iongroup.com<https://www.iongroup.com> From: Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com&gt; Sent: 10 June 2019 22:07 To: David Teigland <teigland(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: Aminur Rahman <aminur.rahman(a)iongroup.com>; users <users(a)ovirt.org&gt; Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Failed to activate Storage Domain --- ovirt 4.2 On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:22 PM David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com<mailto:teigland@redhat.com>> wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:59:43PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: Yes, the second metadata area, at the end of the device is corrupted; the first metadata area is probably ok. That version of lvm is not able to continue by just using the one good copy. Can we copy the first metadata area into the second metadata area? Last week I pushed out major changes to LVM upstream to be able to handle and repair most of these cases. So, one option is to build lvm from the upstream master branch, and check if that can read and repair this metadata. This sound pretty risky for production. pvcreate with --restorefile and --uuid, and with the right backup metadata What would be the right backup metadata? could probably correct things, but experiment with some temporary PVs first. Aminur, can you copy and compress the metadata areas, and shared them somewhere? To copy the first metadata area, use: dd if=/dev/mapper/360014058ccaab4857eb40f393aaf0351 of=md1 bs=128M count=1 skip=4096 iflag=skip_bytes To copy the second metadata area, you need to know the size of the PV. On my setup with 100G PV, I have 800 extents (128M each), and this works: dd if=/dev/mapper/360014058ccaab4857eb40f393aaf0351 of=md2 bs=128M count=1 skip=799 gzip md1 md2 Nir