Re: [Users] compatibility rhev-m (regged, valid entitlement) + ovirt rhev-h for lab part
Hi Itamar,
yep i expected some problems, but i didnt plan to mix rhev-h and
ovirt-nodes in within the same cluster. as long as i dont have to expect to
break other clusters i whould give it a try. subscriptions for the
lab/staging are nonsense in that case, just not needed. and a 2nd
management node, based on ovirt is also overkill.
lets see if its killing my pets
cheers,
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Itamar Heim <iheim(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 10/31/2013 12:02 AM, squadra wrote:
> hi,
>
> i run a fully subscribed rhev 3.2 cluster, meaning rhev-m + rhev-h
> nodes. but, as most or all of you might understand it whould be wishable
> to use the free opensourced version for a extra pair of hostsystems
> which will be used as lab / testing envirement before live deploy of our
> stuff.
>
> so, anyone got experienice in compatibility of ovirt-node images and
> rhev-m (3.2 in my case). does this simply work?
>
> cheers,
>
> juergen
>
> --
>
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/**mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.ovirt.org...
>
>
rhev-m makes assumptions on the compatibility level. not all rhev versions
are 1:1 with ovirt version as some features get disabled or backported to
rhev.
I wouldn't recommend mixing the two together.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.2 KB)