I have HP blades too (ProLiant BL460c Gen9). I have set the fencing to ilo4 and everything
works fine.
Nothing special on the ilo side, just up to date firmware.
Le 5 oct. 2017 à 09:53, Gianluca Cecchi
<gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com> a écrit :
Hello,
on 4.1.6 I'm configuring fencing on HP blades Gen9.
It seems I'm able to use ilo_ssh as agent and that I have only to set 22 as the port
and ssh=1 in options
Question: why ssh=1??? the agent is named ilo_ssh.... shouldn't be obvious???
The same form command line I MUST set -x even if I use fence_ilo_ssh command
Nevertheless, this way I get successful test
Sometimes I don't get the same result if I run from shell eg:
fence_ilo_ssh -a ilo_ip -l fenceuser -S /usr/local/bin/my_fence_script.sh -x -o status
I get sometimes:
Unable to connect/login to fencing device
I think it could be some sort of delay timeout.
In fence_ilo_ssh I see these kinds of timeouts in help
--power-timeout=[seconds] Test X seconds for status change after ON/OFF
--shell-timeout=[seconds] Wait X seconds for cmd prompt after issuing command
--login-timeout=[seconds] Wait X seconds for cmd prompt after login
--power-wait=[seconds] Wait X seconds after issuing ON/OFF
--delay=[seconds] Wait X seconds before fencing is started
How do they map with gui settings options in case I would use some of them?
Also, how do I map the command line option
-4, --inet4-only
Perhaps inet4_only=1 ?
I see that
ssh=1,inet4_only=1
works
but also
ssh=1,inet4_only=1,foo=1
works
So it is not a reliable test to verify syntax...
All in all do you think it is the best agent for ilo4 based blades?
I have made some test with fence_ilo4 but unable to get success... what should I enable
on ilo web administration page in this case, if you think the agent would be better for
any reason?
Thanks,
Gianluca
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users