I have HP blades too (ProLiant BL460c Gen9). I have set the fencing to ilo4 and everything works fine. Nothing special on the ilo side, just up to date firmware.
Le 5 oct. 2017 à 09:53, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> a écrit :
Hello, on 4.1.6 I'm configuring fencing on HP blades Gen9. It seems I'm able to use ilo_ssh as agent and that I have only to set 22 as the port and ssh=1 in options
Question: why ssh=1??? the agent is named ilo_ssh.... shouldn't be obvious??? The same form command line I MUST set -x even if I use fence_ilo_ssh command
Nevertheless, this way I get successful test
Sometimes I don't get the same result if I run from shell eg:
fence_ilo_ssh -a ilo_ip -l fenceuser -S /usr/local/bin/my_fence_script.sh -x -o status
I get sometimes: Unable to connect/login to fencing device
I think it could be some sort of delay timeout. In fence_ilo_ssh I see these kinds of timeouts in help
--power-timeout=[seconds] Test X seconds for status change after ON/OFF --shell-timeout=[seconds] Wait X seconds for cmd prompt after issuing command --login-timeout=[seconds] Wait X seconds for cmd prompt after login --power-wait=[seconds] Wait X seconds after issuing ON/OFF --delay=[seconds] Wait X seconds before fencing is started
How do they map with gui settings options in case I would use some of them?
Also, how do I map the command line option
-4, --inet4-only
Perhaps inet4_only=1 ?
I see that
ssh=1,inet4_only=1 works
but also ssh=1,inet4_only=1,foo=1 works
So it is not a reliable test to verify syntax...
All in all do you think it is the best agent for ilo4 based blades? I have made some test with fence_ilo4 but unable to get success... what should I enable on ilo web administration page in this case, if you think the agent would be better for any reason?
Thanks, Gianluca _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users