On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:57:03AM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Gianluca, how about softening our ntpd requirement with something like http://gerrit.ovirt.org/11291 ?
Could you verify that it's working on your system?
Yes, I can test the change the service modification for vdsmd. I presume you want me to test it with default fedora 18, so chronyd enabled and ntpd disabled, correct?
Yes. though my patch may generate excessive noise, with its attempt to start two conflicting service. I suppose that we can/should "want" only chrony. But please provide your input.
BTW: in case of indipendent services both enabled in a target level, how systemd processes them, in parallel? In old style init there were S25 S35 that ruled the start order, together with some rules inside scripts themselves such as
# Proveides: .... # Required-Start: ....
I'm no systemd expert, but I believe that it build a dependency tree, and attempts to start independet services in parallel, to save time. Dan.