On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:57:03AM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> Gianluca, how about softening our ntpd requirement with something like
>
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/11291 ?
>
> Could you verify that it's working on your system?
Yes, I can test the change the service modification for vdsmd.
I presume you want me to test it with default fedora 18, so chronyd
enabled and ntpd disabled, correct?
Yes. though my patch may generate excessive noise, with its attempt to
start two conflicting service. I suppose that we can/should "want" only
chrony. But please provide your input.
BTW: in case of indipendent services both enabled in a target level,
how systemd processes them, in parallel?
In old style init there were
S25
S35
that ruled the start order, together with some rules inside scripts
themselves such as
# Proveides: ....
# Required-Start: ....
I'm no systemd expert, but I believe that it build a dependency tree,
and attempts to start independet services in parallel, to save time.
Dan.