On 11/2/2019 4:07 AM, Strahil wrote:
You should be able to do that with the POSIX compliant domain ...
If nit, it's better to open a bug so this behaviour is investigated further.
I haven't tried the POXIS compliant domain but from what I recall and
remember happening, I couldn't bind a host to more then a single storage
domain. I could be wrong but I couldn't select more then a single
storage domain a host could be associated with.
So it was either Local storage or GlusterFS storage, but both couldn't
be bound to a single host.
Does oVirt have the facilities to test this out to see how it should be
done?
Thx,
TK
Best Regards,
Strahil NikolovOn Nov 2, 2019 00:38, TomK <tomkcpr(a)mdevsys.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/11/2019 12:10 AM, Strahil wrote:
>> I'm not sure, but you can try with replica 1 gluster volume.
>> Later that gluster volume can be changed to replica 2 arbiter 1 or even better
replica 3 volume.
>>
>
> Now that I see this I'm not sure we're on the same page.
>
> Thinking this might clarify a bit better. Let's take this scenario,
> assume gluster is working perfectly:
>
> HOST01
> 4TB Local LUN /dev/sdb
> 4TB Gluster FS (brick w/ host02,03) /dev/sdc
>
>
> HOST02
> 4TB Local LUN /dev/sdb
> 4TB Gluster FS (brick w/ host01,03) /dev/sdc
>
>
> HOST03
> 4TB Local LUN /dev/sdb
> 4TB Gluster FS (brick w/ host02,01) /dev/sdc
>
>
> For each host I need the local LUN to be available for VM's with the
> GlusterFS storage that's distributed across all three nodes.
>
> However, when I tried to add a local LUN, the host was removed from the
> storage domain rendering it unavailable. Now when I took out the local
> LUN, I was able to readd that host to the GlusterFS storage domain.
>
> So it appears I can't add a local LUN when a host is already
> participating in a GlusterFS storage domain.
>
>
> Cheers,
> TK
>
>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Strahil NikolovOn Oct 10, 2019 13:04, Tom <tk(a)mdevsys.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I take it then theres no way to do so without NFS?
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On Oct 10, 2019, at 2:53 AM, Strahil <hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You can create an NFS on that host and export to itself that local
storage...
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Strahil NikolovOn Oct 9, 2019 07:43, TomK <tomkcpr(a)mdevsys.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Manged to reverse it through the options. Had to deactivate the
custom
>>>>> local cluster.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I have my GlusterFS back and want to try and add some local
storage
>>>>> to each host under the same DC, Cluster and Storage Domain. So
>>>>> effectively I will have two storage locations. One on my GlusterFS
and
>>>>> the other on the local storage I've just defined.
>>>>>
>>>>> Appears I can't make them coexist with oVirt. Either the host is
placed
>>>>> in a separate cluster with local storage, or I move it back to the
>>>>> GlusterFS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Appears I can't have two usable storage types under one host. Is
this
>>>>> correct?
>>>>>
>>>>> What I'm looking for is in the image and shared earlier.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> TK
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/8/2019 11:03 PM, TomK wrote:
>>>>>> I'm working to reverse this scenario.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My storage domain still exists. However I can't activate
it. The
>>>>>> Manage button is greyed out without clear indication as to why.
>>>>>> Difficult to tell what my next move should be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway to find out?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> TK
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/7/2019 8:25 AM, TomK wrote:
>>>>>>> Allright.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I followed this and configured local storage. It had some
default
>>>>>>> names that I changed. It would have been either the default
name, or
>>>>>>> one I choose. In either case it would be a different name
then the
>>>>>>> Gluster storage domain the host was a part of anyway.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Once the process completed for both hosts, I noticed the
Gluster
>>>>>>> volume storage domain was offline and the gluster volume was
gone. I
>>>>>>> can't seem to add that back in anymore. I get:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Error while executing action
DisconnectStorageServerConnection: Error
>>>>>>> storage server disconnection"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Guessing I can't have local storage in addition to
Gluster on the same
>>>>>>> hosts and available for VM's?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reason why I need that is that Gluster is slow but provides
redundancy
>>>>>>> and live migration. But I also wanted direct storage for
VM's
>>>>>>> requiring faster IO. So here's my sc
--
Thx,
TK.