On 16 May 2017 at 09:51, Yedidyah Bar David <didi@redhat.com> wrote:
Re (1.), you should also note that currently, the engine is not even packaged properly for Fedora/CentOS. I know this sounds weird, as everyone uses the packages we provide, but it's true - these packages are not compliant with Fedora's packaging guidelines. Why? Because we use maven for building the engine, and package also many dependencies simply as a result of maven getting them from maven central. See also:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1168605&hide_resolved=0
I guess we could walk the middle ground here for DEBs just like we do for RMPs no? Which means - have java dependency bundle packages and release from resources.ovirt.org... I would love to see a discussion on what it would take to get DEBs through the CI system. I guess we would need some sort of 'build-artifacts.sh.deb' (Or deb8? dep9? not sure what is the convention for Debian version shorthands), some Debian build slaves and Debian equivalents of mock_runner.sh and repoan. -- Barak Korren RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi Red Hat EMEA redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted