ons 2014-01-08 klockan 01:35 -0500 skrev Doron Fediuck:
Hi guys, As far as I know, tuned is not available in centos. So we first need to verify tuned exists.
Are "ksmtuned" and "tuned" different? # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.5 (Final) # service --status-all | grep tuned ksmtuned (pid 10438) is running... # chkconfig | grep tuned ksmtuned 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off /K
Once available, we'll be able to handle the relevant profiles for hypervisors.
Can anyone confirm tuned availability on centos?
<-------- הודעה מקורית -------- <מאת: Amedeo Salvati <תאריך:08/01/2014 00:32 (GMT+02:00) <אל: users@ovirt.org,tmiller@hcjb.org <נושא: [Users] R: tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla <orRegression
Hi Ted,
I'm interested to on this tuned rhs-virtualization profile... where I can find it? And what macro differences has against virtual-host profile?
Best regards a
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:09:44 +0000 From: Ted Miller <tmiller@hcjb.org> To: oVirt Mailing List <users@ovirt.org> Subject: [Users] tuned profile for Centos hosts -- new Bugzilla or Regression Message-ID: <a584ee1c0d4e40a2ae295cf23111628b@DM2PR05MB320.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos hosts.
One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use. At the time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error. It is now just a warning, so it does not prevent installing a host. But, as a warning, a lot of people are probably missing it.
When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a "rhs-virtualization" profile. That profile is not included in Centos. I substituted the "virtual-host" profile.
I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla 987293<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987293>;, where "rhs-virtualization" was substituted for "virtual-host" for RHEV + RHS. I am guessing that whatever is used as a switch to determine RHEV + RHS is also shoving Centos into that same path, which is not appropriate.
My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses "rhs-virtualization" when present, and if it is not present, then it falls back to "virtual-host". (I don't know what (if any) differences there are between the two profiles.)
Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other path?
Ted Miller
Inviato da Tablet Samsung
-- Med Vänliga Hälsningar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Karli Sjöberg Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8) S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden Phone: +46-(0)18-67 15 66 karli.sjoberg@slu.se