Hi, I suspect most users didn't complain because they do not have high IO workloads (yet). I think most people run test setups (as do I). However, in my own (artificial) IO workload test on engine 3.2.3. there was no extreme cpu penalty for higher IO, the read/write(cache/no cache) was an expected linear transformation, with no high cpu at all. I didn't test it with 3.3. though, and as I said it was an artificial workload, no real applications. Am 13.01.2014 21:20, schrieb Blaster:
I didn’t push the IO very hard on it.
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen