Dear ones,
I beg your pardon for coming back on the same issue: let me rephrase more
succinctly.
A view from the REST API about our data domain is:
$ curl -k -s -u 'admin@internal:supersecret' -H 'Accept:
application/json' '
https://engine.example.com/ovirt-engine/api/storagedomains' | jq '[
.["storage_domain"?]|.[0:2]|.[]| {name:.name,storage: .storage |
{type:.type, lun: [ .volume_group.logical_units.logical_unit[] | {portal:
.portal, target: .target } ]} } ]'
[
{
"name": "hosted_storage",
"storage": {
"type": "iscsi",
"lun": [
{
"portal": "10.201.204.10:3260,0",
"target": "iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a43"
}
]
}
},
{
"name": "ovirt-data",
"storage": {
"type": "iscsi",
"lun": [
{
"portal": "10.201.205.20:3260,0",
"target": "iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d3100423524b"
},
{
"portal": "10.201.205.20:3260,0",
"target": "iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d3100423524a"
},
{
"portal": "10.201.205.10:3260,0",
"target": "iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a4b"
},
{
"portal": "10.201.205.10:3260,0",
"target": "iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a4a"
},
{
"portal": "10.201.204.20:3260,0",
"target": "iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235246"
},
{
"portal": "10.201.204.20:3260,0",
"target": "iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235245"
},
{
"portal": "10.201.204.10:3260,0",
"target": "iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a46"
},
{
"portal": "10.201.204.10:3260,0",
"target": "iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a45"
}
]
}
}
]
Is there a way to add to the "hosted_storage" all the available path on
different iSCSI portals and different iSCSI targets, as I did for the
"ovirt-data" storage domain?
Thank you very much for your suggestions.
Best regards,
Francesco Castellano
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:53 PM Francesco Castellano <
francesco.castellano(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Dear sirs,
we're trying to install an SHE oVirt 4.3.6 using an iSCSI SAN that
provides us multiple targets (8) over 4 different portals. Following 5.1 of
"RHV installation using Cockpit" we set up iscsi and multipath ahead with a
90GB LUN to be used for the engine VM. Unfortunately, even if the node OS
sees correctly the LUN, e.g.:
# multipath -ll
> 36000d31004235a000000000000000018 dm-34 COMPELNT,Compellent Vol
> size=90G features='1 queue_if_no_path' hwhandler='0' wp=rw
> `-+- policy='service-time 0' prio=1 status=active
> |- 16:0:0:3 sdu 65:64 active ready running
> |- 24:0:0:3 sdt 65:48 active ready running
> |- 17:0:0:3 sds 65:32 active ready running
> |- 25:0:0:3 sdv 65:80 active ready running
> |- 15:0:0:3 sdx 65:112 active ready running
> |- 29:0:0:3 sdw 65:96 active ready running
> |- 28:0:0:3 sdy 65:128 active ready running
> |- 20:0:0:3 sdz 65:144 active ready running
> `- 21:0:0:3 sdaa 65:160 active ready running
# lsscsi -ist | grep 36000d31004235a000000000000000018
> [15:0:0:3] disk iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a43,t,0x0
> /dev/sdx 36000d31004235a000000000000000018 96.6GB
> [16:0:0:3] disk iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a43,t,0x0
> /dev/sdu 36000d31004235a000000000000000018 96.6GB
> [17:0:0:3] disk iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a44,t,0x0
> /dev/sds 36000d31004235a000000000000000018 96.6GB
> [20:0:0:3] disk iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235243,t,0x0
> /dev/sdz 36000d31004235a000000000000000018 96.6GB
> [21:0:0:3] disk iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235244,t,0x0
> /dev/sdaa 36000d31004235a000000000000000018 96.6GB
> [24:0:0:3] disk iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a48,t,0x0
> /dev/sdt 36000d31004235a000000000000000018 96.6GB
> [25:0:0:3] disk iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a49,t,0x0
> /dev/sdv 36000d31004235a000000000000000018 96.6GB
> [28:0:0:3] disk iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235248,t,0x0
> /dev/sdy 36000d31004235a000000000000000018 96.6GB
> [29:0:0:3] disk iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235249,t,0x0
> /dev/sdw 36000d31004235a000000000000000018 96.6GB
>
# iscsiadm -m session | grep -E '[a2]4[3489]' | sort -k 3.8
> tcp: [1] 10.201.204.10:3260,0
> iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a43 (non-flash)
> tcp: [2] 10.201.204.10:3260,0
> iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a43 (non-flash)
> tcp: [3] 10.201.204.10:3260,0
> iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a44 (non-flash)
> tcp: [6] 10.201.204.20:3260,0
> iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235243 (non-flash)
> tcp: [7] 10.201.204.20:3260,0
> iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235244 (non-flash)
> tcp: [10] 10.201.205.10:3260,0
> iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a48 (non-flash)
> tcp: [11] 10.201.205.10:3260,0
> iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235a49 (non-flash)
> tcp: [14] 10.201.205.20:3260,0
> iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235248 (non-flash)
> tcp: [15] 10.201.205.20:3260,0
> iqn.2002-03.com.compellent:5000d31004235249 (non-flash)
>
during the engine deploy neither via cockpit nor with "hosted-engine
--deploy" it was able to see any LUN.
Having a lot of portals (4) and each having 4 targets (two of which being
independents path to the LUN), we chose a portal to discover, it proposed
us 4 targets, and we had to choose a target to log in, but in the end, no
LUN was proposed.
After a few attempts, we found that, if we logged out from any targets
(and clean up the open-iscsi database), after the login in an appropriate
target, the installer proposed us the LUN, and we successfully deployed the
SHE.
But unfortunately, such an installation doesn't track effectively all the
8 paths over 8 different targets, but just the one chosen during the
installation (this is different, for example, with respect to other LUNs
for data domains that we attached afterwards). Thus we miss the HA we aimed
to for the engine data domain.
I said this, because when I ask for /ovirt-engine/api/storagedomains,
whilst a second LUN has 8 children with different targets
below storage_domain/${another data
domain}/storage/volume_group/logical_units/logical_unit/, for the
hosted_storage I just have one.
My questions are:
a) is there a way to add the other targets/paths consistently (even
through the REST interface)?
b) is there another installation, or recovery, procedure to get the engine
data domain in high availability on our iSCSI topology?
Thank you so much for your suggestions, they are really appreciated,
Best regards,
Francesco Castellano