8:58 a.m.
Chandrahasa:
(Apologies for the delayed reply, I was on vacation.)
This is an ongoing debate in the oVirt community. On the one hand, a forum would lend
itself well to the benefits you describe, but on the other hand, the community has grown
comfortable with the mailing list format. We have considered both, but separate
"channels" could divert attention away from either channel.
Currently, we are exploring an upcoming Mailman 3 tool, known as hyperkitty, which should
enable using the mailing list content much more like a forum. This *should* give us the
kind of access you are describing.
Peace,
BKP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chandrahasa S" <chandrahasa.s(a)tcs.com>
To: users-bounces(a)ovirt.org, users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 12:09:42 AM
Subject: [ovirt-users] Why Ovirt do not have - User community Forum
Dear All,
Why we do not have Ovirt Forum like CentOS. Where I can see all reported /
solved issues.
CentOS forum is : https://www.centos.org/forums/
Regards,
Chandrahasa S
Tata Consultancy Services
Data Center- ( Non STPI)
2nd Pokharan Road,
Subash Nagar ,
Mumbai - 400601,Maharashtra
India
Ph:- +91 22 677-81825
Buzz:- 4221825
Mailto: chandrahasa.s(a)tcs.com
Website: http://www.tcs.com
____________________________________________
Experience certainty. IT Services
Business Solutions
Consulting
____________________________________________
From: Federico Simoncelli <fsimonce(a)redhat.com>
To: Daniel Helgenberger <daniel.helgenberger(a)m-box.de>
Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
Date: 08/05/2014 06:51 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] SPM in oVirt 3.6
Sent by: users-bounces(a)ovirt.org
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Daniel Helgenberger" <daniel.helgenberger(a)m-box.de>
> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org, "Federico Simoncelli" <fsimonce(a)redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 6:43:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] SPM in oVirt 3.6
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Daniel Helgenberger" <daniel.helgenberger(a)m-box.de>
> > To: users(a)ovirt.org
> > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 7:51:33 PM
> > Subject: [ovirt-users] SPM in oVirt 3.6
> >
> > just out of pure curiosity: In a BZ [1] Allon mentions SPM will go away
> > in ovirt 3.6.
> >
> > This seems like a major change for me. I assume this will replace
> > sanlock as well? What will SPM be replaced with?
>
> No, sanlock is not going anywhere.
>
> The change is that we will not have an SPM node, but any node that need to
> make meta data changes, will take a lock using sanlock while it make the
> changes.
>
> Federico: can you describe in more details how it is going to work?
Most of the information can be found on the feature page:
http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Decommission_Master_Domain_and_SPM
--
Federico
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
review, distribution, printing or copying of the
information contained in this e-mail message
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error,
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
immediately and permanently delete the message
and any attachments. Thank you
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users