Re: [Users] Instructions to add a remote controlled power strip not in the native list?

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:37:13AM -0700, David Smith wrote: > I created fence_raritan. > > Unfortunately it looks like fencing.py is where the legacy --option was > translated to --action. I believe ovirt calls fencing.py as a proxy to > execute fence_raritan? > > The version of fence-agents I pulled from git has the backwards > compatibility removed; > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/cluster-commits/2013-February/00... > > > So if I added support for it in fence_raritan I'm not sure it would work (I > can try) but also the fence-agents guys probably wouldn't take the > submission to have it added to future code. Indeed - I do not expect upstream fence-agents to accept the legacy option. However, you could backport your own code to el6, and create a "fence-agents-raritan" rpm from it. > > I edited API.py as in http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/26075/ and re-compiled > API.py to pyc and pyo files and copied to all my hosts, yet I'm still > getting an error, so I'm wondering if that change is incomplete or I missed > some other step to make this actually work. It's really a bummer > especially since the default behavior with no action is reboot ;) I suppose that you have missed something. My don't you place API.py under /usr/share/vdsm ? And make sure you restart vdsmd, to make the new code take effect? > > > *Thread-199071::DEBUG::2014-03-25 10:28:10,587::API::1110::vds::(fenceNode) > fenceNode(addr=10.105.128.25,port=,agent=raritan,user=admin,passwd=XXXX,action=status,secure=,options=port=/system1/outlet6)* > > > *Thread-199071::DEBUG::2014-03-25 10:28:13,104::API::1136::vds::(fenceNode) > rc 0 in agent=fence_raritan* > *ipaddr=10.105.128.25* > *login=admin* > *option=status* > *passwd=XXXX* > *port=/system1/outlet6 out Success: Rebooted* > * err Parse error: Ignoring unknown option 'option=status'* > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 05:46:58AM -0400, Eli Mesika wrote: > > > AFAIK this is related to http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/24343/ which > > changed --option to --action > > > danken ? > > > > I smells very much related. > > Where is fence_raritan comming from? Could you have the el6 version of > > it support the legacy --option name? > > > > If not, we could consider taking http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/26075/. > > > > Dan. > >