3:07 a.m.
You should be able to do that with the POSIX compliant domain ...
If nit, it's better to open a bug so this behaviour is investigated further.
Best Regards,
Strahil NikolovOn Nov 2, 2019 00:38, TomK <tomkcpr(a)mdevsys.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/11/2019 12:10 AM, Strahil wrote:
> > I'm not sure, but you can try with replica 1 gluster volume.
> > Later that gluster volume can be changed to replica 2 arbiter 1 or even better
replica 3 volume.
> >
>
> Now that I see this I'm not sure we're on the same page.
>
> Thinking this might clarify a bit better. Let's take this scenario,
> assume gluster is working perfectly:
>
> HOST01
> 4TB Local LUN /dev/sdb
> 4TB Gluster FS (brick w/ host02,03) /dev/sdc
>
>
> HOST02
> 4TB Local LUN /dev/sdb
> 4TB Gluster FS (brick w/ host01,03) /dev/sdc
>
>
> HOST03
> 4TB Local LUN /dev/sdb
> 4TB Gluster FS (brick w/ host02,01) /dev/sdc
>
>
> For each host I need the local LUN to be available for VM's with the
> GlusterFS storage that's distributed across all three nodes.
>
> However, when I tried to add a local LUN, the host was removed from the
> storage domain rendering it unavailable. Now when I took out the local
> LUN, I was able to readd that host to the GlusterFS storage domain.
>
> So it appears I can't add a local LUN when a host is already
> participating in a GlusterFS storage domain.
>
>
> Cheers,
> TK
>
>
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Strahil NikolovOn Oct 10, 2019 13:04, Tom <tk(a)mdevsys.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I take it then theres no way to do so without NFS?
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >>> On Oct 10, 2019, at 2:53 AM, Strahil <hunter86_bg(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
> >>>
> >>> You can create an NFS on that host and export to itself that local
storage...
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>> Strahil NikolovOn Oct 9, 2019 07:43, TomK <tomkcpr(a)mdevsys.com>
wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Manged to reverse it through the options. Had to deactivate the
custom
> >>>> local cluster.
> >>>>
> >>>> Now I have my GlusterFS back and want to try and add some local
storage
> >>>> to each host under the same DC, Cluster and Storage Domain. So
> >>>> effectively I will have two storage locations. One on my GlusterFS
and
> >>>> the other on the local storage I've just defined.
> >>>>
> >>>> Appears I can't make them coexist with oVirt. Either the host
is placed
> >>>> in a separate cluster with local storage, or I move it back to the
> >>>> GlusterFS.
> >>>>
> >>>> Appears I can't have two usable storage types under one host.
Is this
> >>>> correct?
> >>>>
> >>>> What I'm looking for is in the image and shared earlier.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> TK
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 10/8/2019 11:03 PM, TomK wrote:
> >>>>> I'm working to reverse this scenario.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My storage domain still exists. However I can't activate
it. The
> >>>>> Manage button is greyed out without clear indication as to why.
> >>>>> Difficult to tell what my next move should be.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Anyway to find out?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> TK
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 10/7/2019 8:25 AM, TomK wrote:
> >>>>>> Allright.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So I followed this and configured local storage. It had
some default
> >>>>>> names that I changed. It would have been either the default
name, or
> >>>>>> one I choose. In either case it would be a different name
then the
> >>>>>> Gluster storage domain the host was a part of anyway.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Once the process completed for both hosts, I noticed the
Gluster
> >>>>>> volume storage domain was offline and the gluster volume was
gone. I
> >>>>>> can't seem to add that back in anymore. I get:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "Error while executing action
DisconnectStorageServerConnection: Error
> >>>>>> storage server disconnection"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Guessing I can't have local storage in addition to
Gluster on the same
> >>>>>> hosts and available for VM's?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Reason why I need that is that Gluster is slow but provides
redundancy
> >>>>>> and live migration. But I also wanted direct storage for
VM's
> >>>>>> requiring faster IO. So here's my sc