Re: [Users] Bridge for logical network

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Juan Pablo Lorier" <jplorier(a)gmail.com&gt; > To: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: "users" <users(a)ovirt.org&gt; > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 2:50:08 AM > Subject: Re: [Users] Bridge for logical network > > Hi Dan > > By hiding the eths, will I be able to use the bridge to assign it to a vm? > Regards, > As long as the bridge is defined on engine side and reported by VDSM you should be able to assign vms to it. Please report if hiding the additional nics (only one nic shouldn't be hidden) works for you. > El 09/09/13 19:48, Dan Kenigsberg escribió: >> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:19:48PM -0300, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Another question: I need to connect 2 eths to a Fortigate cluster so I >>> need them to be in a bridge with single ip so it can connect to the DMZ. >>> As far as I can see, ovirt 3.2 is allowing me to create bonds and assign >>> logical network to them, but not to create a bridge. Can I create it >>> manually and get ovirt to handle it? >> Indeed, ovirt does not support setting up a bridge with multiple >> physical legs. >> >> I do not recall having tried that, but I have a suspition that Engine >> may be confused if such a bridge is to be reported by Vdsm. The engine do complains about a bridge created on more than a single interface. >> If that happens, I suggest that you list these two eths in vdsm.conf's >> hidden_nics. Then, they would not show up on ovirt's network editing >> tools and would not tempt admins to use them for other purposes. >> >> Dan. >> Please test it out and r > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >