Re: [Users] Update from 3.2 to 3.3 (CentOS 6.4)

On 09/23/2013 03:51 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Il 17/09/2013 00:48, Mike Burns ha scritto: >> On 09/16/2013 06:41 PM, H. Haven Liu wrote: >>> Thanks for the discussion. But for those of us that are not using >>> gluster, but just good ol' NFS, is updating simply "yum update >>> ovirt-*"? >>> >> >> No, yum update won't upgrade ovirt packages. >> >> If you're running on Fedora, you need to update Fedora first, then run engine-upgrade. If you're on EL6, a simple engine-upgrade should work. >> >> Ofer, any other gotchas? Can you have someone create a 3.2 to 3.3 upgrade page on the wiki? > > Here you can find the test results of upgrading from Fedora 18 / oVirt 3.2 to Fedora 19 oVirt 3.3: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005950 > > I'm a bit short on time, but I can try to find some for creating that page. Any preference on the URL / page name? Previous ones exist like this: http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.0_to_3.1_upgrade http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.1_to_3.2_upgrade so this would make sense: http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.2_to_3.2_upgrade

> > > >> >> Thanks >> >> Mike >> >>> On Sep 16, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Mike Burns <mburns(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> On 09/16/2013 05:26 PM, Joop wrote: >>>>> Mike Burns wrote: >>>>>> On 09/16/2013 04:30 PM, Joop wrote: >>>>>>> H. Haven Liu wrote: >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there any recommended procedure for updating from 3.2 to >>>>>>>> 3.3 (namely on a CentOS 6.4 system), or anything one should >>>>>>>> be careful when doing such update? >>>>>>> Be careful when you use glusterfs, not nfs over glusterfs, >>>>>>> but read the release-notes. It should have something to say >>>>>>> about glusterfs domain not (yet) working on el6. Saw a small >>>>>>> discussion on irc just yet and my two cents are that you >>>>>>> can't add el6 support to ovirt in release 3.2 and then >>>>>>> withdraw it with 3.3 and say well just wait for >>>>>>> Centos/Rhel-6.5. >>>>>> >>>>>> We haven't removed any functionality in 3.3. In 3.2, we added >>>>>> support for gluster domains through a POSIXFS interface. In >>>>>> 3.3, we're adding a feature where we support gluster natively. >>>>>> This works in Fedora, but is not available on EL6. The POSIXFS >>>>>> option still exists >>>>> You're right but what about users who want to use the (much) >>>>> improved speed of the gluster domain over the POSIXFS interface? >>>>> They are left out or they should move to Fed19 which I would do >>>>> but I need to convince a couple of other people as well and they >>>>> aren't going to agree. >>>> >>>> I understand the complaint, honestly. And we're working on a >>>> solution so that it will work for people on EL6. >>>> >>>> From the perspective of whether we should release with this >>>> limitation or not, I'd point out that by not releasing, we'd be >>>> preventing everyone from using any of the new features until we get >>>> a solution for this. I'd rather release and make it available for >>>> everyone now and say that the Gluster domain for EL6 will come as >>>> soon as we can work out the dependency issues. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> The kernel can come from elrepo so that is not a burden for >>>>>>> the ovirt team, qemu/libvirt should be build by the ovirt >>>>>>> team and be available from the ovirt repo. At the moment I >>>>>>> also see/saw Jboss-7.1.1 qemu/libvirt wouldn't be the first >>>>>>> packages to be in the ovirt-repo which are also in the main >>>>>>> distributions repos. >>>>>> >>>>>> We're trying to work out a way to do this in a consistent >>>>>> manner going forward. We should have a solution soon, but in >>>>>> the meantime, the other functionality and features should work >>>>>> on both Fedora and EL6. >>>>> Thanks for the clarification and I'm waiting eagerly for >>>>> what/when the solution comes out. >>>> >>>> There have been a few considerations for solving this including >>>> rebuilding pure upstream or fedora packages for EL6. That is a >>>> risky solution in my mind since there are rather large deltas >>>> between Fedora and EL6. We're looking at whether we can have a >>>> "virt-preview" type of repo for EL6 similar to what exists today >>>> for Fedora[1]. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Mike >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Preview_Repository >>>>> >>>>> Joop >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ Users mailing >>>>> list Users(a)ovirt.org >>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list >>>> Users(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list >>> Users(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users(a)ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >