On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Michal Skrivanek <mskrivan@redhat.com> wrote:
Not sure why it is proposed just now and not before. The -lxc package is not used by oVirt, so it will just sit there. The libvirt-daemon-config-network package should be harmless, it just
contains
the configuration fir libvirt's default bridge ‘virbr0'
well, harmless….though for a good reason we stopped pulling in “libvirt” as the metapackage brings problematic deps in certain cases (iirc it was due to ppc64le) That’s why we depend on exactly just libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter libvirt-daemon-kvm libvirt-lock-sanlock libvirt-client libvirt-python
As Francesco says it’s mostly harmless, it’s just that on a truly clean environment “libvirt” wouldn’t be installed
Thanks, michal
Ok, and indeed in my system is not installed... so the question is why inside the web admin gui there is a complaint about libvirt missing if not needed: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mveWNDNWpZdjIwV0U/view?usp=sharin...