
Interesting, my storage network is a L2 only and doesn't run on the ovirtmgmt (which is the only thing HostedEngine sees) but I've only seen this issue when running ctdb in front of my NFS server. I previously was using localhost as all my hosts had the nfs server on it (gluster). On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Artyom Lukianov <alukiano@redhat.com> wrote:
I just blocked connection to storage for testing, but on result I had this error: "Failed to acquire lock error -243", so I added it in reproduce steps. If you know another steps to reproduce this error, without blocking connection to storage it also can be wonderful if you can provide them. Thanks
----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Lau" <andrew@andrewklau.com> To: "combuster" <combuster@archlinux.us> Cc: "users" <users@ovirt.org> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 3:47:00 AM Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] VM HostedEngie is down. Exist message: internal error Failed to acquire lock error -243
I just ran a few extra tests, I had a 2 host, hosted-engine running for a day. They both had a score of 2400. Migrated the VM through the UI multiple times, all worked fine. I then added the third host, and that's when it all fell to pieces. Other two hosts have a score of 0 now.
I'm also curious, in the BZ there's a note about:
where engine-vm block connection to storage domain(via iptables -I INPUT -s sd_ip -j DROP)
What's the purpose for that?
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Andrew Lau <andrew@andrewklau.com> wrote:
Ignore that, the issue came back after 10 minutes.
I've even tried a gluster mount + nfs server on top of that, and the same issue has come back.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Andrew Lau <andrew@andrewklau.com> wrote:
Interesting, I put it all into global maintenance. Shut it all down for 10~ minutes, and it's regained it's sanlock control and doesn't seem to have that issue coming up in the log.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:21 PM, combuster <combuster@archlinux.us> wrote:
It was pure NFS on a NAS device. They all had different ids (had no redeployements of nodes before problem occured).
Thanks Jirka.
On 06/06/2014 08:19 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
I've seen that problem in other threads, the common denominator was "nfs on top of gluster". So if you have this setup, then it's a known problem. Or you should double check if you hosts have different ids otherwise they would be trying to acquire the same lock.
--Jirka
On 06/06/2014 08:03 AM, Andrew Lau wrote:
Hi Ivan,
Thanks for the in depth reply.
I've only seen this happen twice, and only after I added a third host to the HA cluster. I wonder if that's the root problem.
Have you seen this happen on all your installs or only just after your manual migration? It's a little frustrating this is happening as I was hoping to get this into a production environment. It was all working except that log message :(
Thanks, Andrew
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:20 PM, combuster <combuster@archlinux.us> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > this is something that I saw in my logs too, first on one node and then > on > the other three. When that happend on all four of them, engine was > corrupted > beyond repair. > > First of all, I think that message is saying that sanlock can't get a > lock > on the shared storage that you defined for the hostedengine during > installation. I got this error when I've tried to manually migrate the > hosted engine. There is an unresolved bug there and I think it's related > to > this one: > > [Bug 1093366 - Migration of hosted-engine vm put target host score to > zero] > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093366 > > This is a blocker bug (or should be) for the selfhostedengine and, from > my > own experience with it, shouldn't be used in the production enviroment > (not > untill it's fixed). > > Nothing that I've done couldn't fix the fact that the score for the > target > node was Zero, tried to reinstall the node, reboot the node, restarted > several services, tailed a tons of logs etc but to no avail. When only > one > node was left (that was actually running the hosted engine), I brought > the > engine's vm down gracefully (hosted-engine --vm-shutdown I belive) and > after > that, when I've tried to start the vm - it wouldn't load. Running VNC > showed > that the filesystem inside the vm was corrupted and when I ran fsck and > finally started up - it was too badly damaged. I succeded to start the > engine itself (after repairing postgresql service that wouldn't want to > start) but the database was damaged enough and acted pretty weird > (showed > that storage domains were down but the vm's were running fine etc). > Lucky > me, I had already exported all of the VM's on the first sign of trouble > and > then installed ovirt-engine on the dedicated server and attached the > export > domain. > > So while really a usefull feature, and it's working (for the most part > ie, > automatic migration works), manually migrating VM with the hosted-engine > will lead to troubles. > > I hope that my experience with it, will be of use to you. It happened to > me > two weeks ago, ovirt-engine was current (3.4.1) and there was no fix > available. > > Regards, > > Ivan > > On 06/06/2014 05:12 AM, Andrew Lau wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm seeing this weird message in my engine log > > 2014-06-06 03:06:09,380 INFO > [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsUpdateRunTimeInfo] > (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-79) RefreshVmList vm id > 85d4cfb9-f063-4c7c-a9f8-2b74f5f7afa5 status = WaitForLaunch on vds > ov-hv2-2a-08-23 ignoring it in the refresh until migration is done > 2014-06-06 03:06:12,494 INFO > [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.DestroyVDSCommand] > (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-89) START, DestroyVDSCommand(HostName = > ov-hv2-2a-08-23, HostId = c04c62be-5d34-4e73-bd26-26f805b2dc60, > vmId=85d4cfb9-f063-4c7c-a9f8-2b74f5f7afa5, force=false, > secondsToWait=0, gracefully=false), log id: 62a9d4c1 > 2014-06-06 03:06:12,561 INFO > [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.DestroyVDSCommand] > (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-89) FINISH, DestroyVDSCommand, log id: > 62a9d4c1 > 2014-06-06 03:06:12,652 INFO > [org.ovirt.engine.core.dal.dbbroker.auditloghandling.AuditLogDirector] > (DefaultQuartzScheduler_ > Worker-89) Correlation ID: null, Call Stack: > null, Custom Event ID: -1, Message: VM HostedEngine is down. Exit > message: internal error Failed to acquire lock: error -243. > > It also appears to occur on the other hosts in the cluster, except the > host which is running the hosted-engine. So right now 3 servers, it > shows up twice in the engine UI. > > The engine VM continues to run peacefully, without any issues on the > host which doesn't have that error. > > Any ideas? > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users