On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 09:02:10AM +0000, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
I am not suggesting that 1GB qemu overhead is not interesting, but I do
not think this list is the best place to find the answer. I suggest that
you specify the libvirt and qemu versions, and take the question - and
the bug - to qemu-devel(a)nongnu.org.
Ta!
Alex
On 15 January 2013 08:54, Alex Leonhardt <alex.tuxx(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure no prob - will do ..
>
>
> On 15 January 2013 07:17, Doron Fediuck <dfediuck(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>> Interesting, we'll need to look into it.
>> Do you mind opening a BZ? I'll see that it's routed to the relevant
>> people.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Doron
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Alex Leonhardt" <alex.tuxx(a)gmail.com>
>> *To: *"Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck(a)redhat.com>
>> *Cc: *"oVirt Mailing List" <users(a)ovirt.org>
>> *Sent: *Monday, January 14, 2013 7:41:40 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [Users] oVirt Node (HyperVisor) - Memory Usage
>>
>>
>> qemu 24233 11.0 1.0 *3030420* 1008484 ? Sl 2012 2189:02
>> /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -S -M rhel6.3.0 -cpu Conroe -enable-kvm *-m
>> 2048*-smp 4,sockets=1,cores=4,threads=1 -name
>>
>> above example shows ~3 Gig VSZ but only 2048m are actually configured ...
>>
>> if i'm not too blind and dumb :) ... 3030420 kb = 2959.39 mb ... and
>> that's not what is configured as the VMs max allowed ram ...
>>
>> Alex