and what about the changelog of 4.1.3 ?<o:p></o:p></span></p><div><p class= =3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>BZ 1022961 Gl= uster: running a VM from a gluster domain should use gluster URI instead of= a fuse mount"<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p><span style=3D'font-famil= y:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div id=3DSignature><p = class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p>&nb= sp;</o:p></span></p><div><p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-bottom:12.0pt= '><span style=3D'font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>-- <br><br>Respectfully<= b><br>Mahdi A. Mahdi</b><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div class= =3DMsoNormal align=3Dcenter style=3D'text-align:center'><hr size=3D4 width= =3D"98%" align=3Dcenter></div><div id=3DdivRplyFwdMsg><p class=3DMsoNormal>= <b><span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:<= /span></b><span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'= <a href=3D"mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org">users-bounces@ovirt.org</a> &l= t;<a href=3D"mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org">users-bounces@ovirt.org</a>>= ; on behalf of Ralf Schenk <<a href=3D"mailto:rs@databay.de">rs@databay.= de</a>><br><b>Sent:</b> Monday, June 19, 2017 7:32:45 PM<br><b>To:</b> <= a href=3D"mailto:users@ovirt.org">users@ovirt.org</a><br><b>Subject:</b> Re= : [ovirt-users] Very poor GlusterFS performance</span> <o:p></o:p></p><div>= <p class=3DMsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div><p><span style= =3D'font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'>Hello,</span><o:p></o:p></p><p><spa= n style=3D'font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'>Gluster-Performance is bad. = Thats why I asked for native qemu-libgfapi access for Ovirt-VM's to gluster= volumes which I thought to be possible since 3.6.x. Documentation is misle= ading and still in 4.1.2 Ovirt is using fuse to mount gluster-based VM-Disk= s.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p>Bye<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbs=
Good luck,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal><br><br><o:p></o:=
-cache: off<br>performance.stat-prefetch: off<br>performance.low-prio-thre= ads: 32<br>network.remote-dio: off<br>cluster.eager-lock: enable<br>cluster= .quorum-type: auto<br>cluster.server-quorum-type: server<br>cluster.data-se= lf-heal-algorithm: full<br>cluster.locking-scheme: granular<br>cluster.shd-= max-threads: 8<br>cluster.shd-wait-qlength: 10000<br>features.shard: on<br>= user.cifs: off<br>storage.owner-uid: 36<br>storage.owner-gid: 36<br>feature= s.shard-block-size: 128MB<br>performance.strict-o-direct: on<br>network.pin= g-timeout: 30<br>cluster.granular-entry-heal: enable<br><br>I would really = appreciate some guidance on this to try to improve things<br>because at thi= s rate I will need to reconsider using GlusterFS altogether.<br><br>Cheers,= <br>Chris<br><br>-- <br>Chris Boot<br><a href=3D"mailto:bootc@bootc.net">bo= otc@bootc.net</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>Use= rs mailing list<br><a href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org">Users@ovirt.org</a><b= r><a href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users">http://lists.ov= irt.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><o:p></o:p></p></div></div></blockquote><= /div><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><p class=3DMsoNormal><= br><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><pre>____________________________________________= ___<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>Users mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre><pre><a href=3D= "mailto:Users@ovirt.org">Users@ovirt.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre><pre><a href= =3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users">http://lists.ovirt.org/m= ailman/listinfo/users</a><o:p></o:p></pre></blockquote><p class=3DMsoNormal= <o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=3DMsoNormal>-- <o:p></o:p></p><table cl= ass=3DMsoNormalTable border=3D0 cellspacing=3D0 cellpadding=3D0><tr><td col= span=3D3 style=3D'padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=3DMsoNormal><img border= =3D0 width=3D151 height=3D30 id=3D"_x0000_i1026" src=3D"cid:image001.gif@01= D2F8B7.C9A43050"><o:p></o:p></p></td></tr><tr><td valign=3Dtop style=3D'pad= ding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;= font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'><br><b>Ralf Schenk</b><br>fon +49 (0) 24 = 05 / 40 83 70<br>fax +49 (0) 24 05 / 40 83 759<br>mail <a href=3D"mailto:rs= @databay.de"><b><span style=3D'color:red'>rs@databay.de</span></b></a></spa= n><o:p></o:p></p></td><td width=3D33 style=3D'width:22.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm = 0cm 0cm'><p class=3DMsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></td><td valign=3Dtop st= yle=3D'padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-si= ze:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'><br><b>Databay AG</b><br>Jens-O= tto-Krag-Stra=DFe 11<br>D-52146 W=FCrselen<br><a href=3D"http://www.databay= .de"><b><span style=3D'color:red'>www.databay.de</span></b></a> </span><o:p= </o:p></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan=3D3 valign=3Dtop style=3D'padding:0cm = 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'font-size:7.5pt;font-famil= y:"Verdana",sans-serif'><br>Sitz/Amtsgericht Aachen • HRB:8437 •= ; USt-IdNr.: DE 210844202<br>Vorstand: Ralf Schenk, Dipl.-Ing. Jens Conze, = Aresch Yavari, Dipl.-Kfm. Philipp Hermanns<br>Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Wi= lhelm Dohmen </span><o:p></o:p></p></td></tr></table><div class=3DMsoNormal= align=3Dcenter style=3D'text-align:center'><hr size=3D1 width=3D"100%" nos= hade style=3D'color:black' align=3Dcenter></div></div></div></div></body></=
--_004_BFAB40933B3367488CE6299BAF8592D1014E52E492F3SOCRATESasl_ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BFAB40933B3367488CE6299BAF8592D1014E52E492F3SOCRATESasl_" --_000_BFAB40933B3367488CE6299BAF8592D1014E52E492F3SOCRATESasl_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, it's the same for me. I've update all my hosts to the latest release and th= ought it would now use libgfapi since BZ 1022961<https://bugzilla.redhat.co= m/1022961> is listed in the release notes under enhancements. Are there an= y steps that need to be taken after upgrading for this to work ? Thank you, Sven Von: users-bounces@ovirt.org [mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org] Im Auftrag vo= n Mahdi Adnan Gesendet: Samstag, 8. Juli 2017 09:35 An: Ralf Schenk <rs@databay.de>; users@ovirt.org; ykaul@redhat.com Betreff: Re: [ovirt-users] Very poor GlusterFS performance So ovirt access gluster vai FUSE ? i thought its using libgfapi. When can we expect it to work with libgfapi ? and what about the changelog of 4.1.3 ? BZ 1022961 Gluster: running a VM from a gluster domain should use gluster U= RI instead of a fuse mount" -- Respectfully Mahdi A. Mahdi ________________________________ From: users-bounces@ovirt.org<mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org> <users-bounce= s@ovirt.org<mailto:users-bounces@ovirt.org>> on behalf of Ralf Schenk <rs@d= atabay.de<mailto:rs@databay.de>> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 7:32:45 PM To: users@ovirt.org<mailto:users@ovirt.org> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Very poor GlusterFS performance Hello, Gluster-Performance is bad. Thats why I asked for native qemu-libgfapi acce= ss for Ovirt-VM's to gluster volumes which I thought to be possible since 3= .6.x. Documentation is misleading and still in 4.1.2 Ovirt is using fuse to= mount gluster-based VM-Disks. Bye Am 19.06.2017 um 17:23 schrieb Darrell Budic: Chris- You probably need to head over to gluster-users@gluster.org<mailto:gluster-= users@gluster.org> for help with performance issues. That said, what kind of performance are you getting, via some form or testi= ng like bonnie++ or even dd runs? Raw bricks vs gluster performance is usef= ul to determine what kind of performance you're actually getting. Beyond that, I'd recommend dropping the arbiter bricks and re-adding them a= s full replicas, they can't serve distributed data in this configuration an= d may be slowing things down on you. If you've got a storage network setup,= make sure it's using the largest MTU it can, and consider adding/testing t= hese settings that I use on my main storage volume: performance.io<http://performance.io>-thread-count: 32 client.event-threads: 8 server.event-threads: 3 performance.stat-prefetch: on Good luck, -Darrell On Jun 19, 2017, at 9:46 AM, Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net<mailto:bootc@bootc= .net>> wrote: Hi folks, I have 3x servers in a "hyper-converged" oVirt 4.1.2 + GlusterFS 3.10 configuration. My VMs run off a replica 3 arbiter 1 volume comprised of 6 bricks, which themselves live on two SSDs in each of the servers (one brick per SSD). The bricks are XFS on LVM thin volumes straight onto the SSDs. Connectivity is 10G Ethernet. Performance within the VMs is pretty terrible. I experience very low throughput and random IO is really bad: it feels like a latency issue. On my oVirt nodes the SSDs are not generally very busy. The 10G network seems to run without errors (iperf3 gives bandwidth measurements of >=3D 9.20 Gbits/sec between the three servers). To put this into perspective: I was getting better behaviour from NFS4 on a gigabit connection than I am with GlusterFS on 10G: that doesn't feel right at all. My volume configuration looks like this: Volume Name: vmssd Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: d5a5ddd1-a140-4e0d-b514-701cfe464853 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 2 x (2 + 1) =3D 6 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: ovirt3:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick Brick2: ovirt1:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick Brick3: ovirt2:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick (arbiter) Brick4: ovirt3:/gluster/ssd1_vmssd/brick Brick5: ovirt1:/gluster/ssd1_vmssd/brick Brick6: ovirt2:/gluster/ssd1_vmssd/brick (arbiter) Options Reconfigured: nfs.disable: on transport.address-family: inet6 performance.quick-read: off performance.read-ahead: off performance.io<http://performance.io>-cache: off performance.stat-prefetch: off performance.low-prio-threads: 32 network.remote-dio: off cluster.eager-lock: enable cluster.quorum-type: auto cluster.server-quorum-type: server cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm: full cluster.locking-scheme: granular cluster.shd-max-threads: 8 cluster.shd-wait-qlength: 10000 features.shard: on user.cifs: off storage.owner-uid: 36 storage.owner-gid: 36 features.shard-block-size: 128MB performance.strict-o-direct: on network.ping-timeout: 30 cluster.granular-entry-heal: enable I would really appreciate some guidance on this to try to improve things because at this rate I will need to reconsider using GlusterFS altogether. Cheers, Chris -- Chris Boot bootc@bootc.net<mailto:bootc@bootc.net> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org<mailto:Users@ovirt.org> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org<mailto:Users@ovirt.org> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- [cid:image001.gif@01D2F8B7.C9A43050] Ralf Schenk fon +49 (0) 24 05 / 40 83 70 fax +49 (0) 24 05 / 40 83 759 mail rs@databay.de<mailto:rs@databay.de> Databay AG Jens-Otto-Krag-Stra=DFe 11 D-52146 W=FCrselen www.databay.de<http://www.databay.de> Sitz/Amtsgericht Aachen * HRB:8437 * USt-IdNr.: DE 210844202 Vorstand: Ralf Schenk, Dipl.-Ing. Jens Conze, Aresch Yavari, Dipl.-Kfm. Phi= lipp Hermanns Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Wilhelm Dohmen ________________________________ --_000_BFAB40933B3367488CE6299BAF8592D1014E52E492F3SOCRATESasl_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr= osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:= //www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content= =3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Micr= osoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#d= efault#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style><![endif]--><style><!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Helvetica; panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Consolas; panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Verdana; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; color:black;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} p {mso-style-priority:99; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; color:black;} pre {mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"HTML Vorformatiert Zchn"; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Courier New"; color:black;} span.HTMLVorformatiertZchn {mso-style-name:"HTML Vorformatiert Zchn"; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"HTML Vorformatiert"; font-family:"Consolas",serif; color:black;} span.E-MailFormatvorlage20 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; color:#1F497D;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; font-size:10.0pt;} @page WordSection1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 2.0cm 70.85pt;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" /> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit"> <o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" /> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body bgcolor=3Dwhite lang=3DDE li= nk=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple><div class=3DWordSection1><p class=3DMsoNormal><sp= an style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D= ;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Hi All, <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNo= rmal><span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color= :#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class= =3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Cali= bri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>it’s the sa= me for me. I’ve update all my hosts to the latest release and thought= it would now use libgfapi since <a href=3D"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/102= 2961"><span style=3D'color:#1F497D;text-decoration:none'>BZ 1022961</span><= /a> is listed in the release notes under enhancements. =A0Are there any ste= ps that need to be taken after upgrading for this to work ? <o:p></o:p></sp= an></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;fo= nt-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o= :p> </o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US style=3D'= font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast= -language:EN-US'>Thank you, <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><spa= n lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;c= olor:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Sven <o:p></o:p></span></p><p clas= s=3DMsoNormal><a name=3D"_MailEndCompose"><span lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-= size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-lang= uage:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p><div><div style=3D'border:none;= border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=3DMsoNor= mal><b><span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;col= or:windowtext'>Von:</span></b><span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"= Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext'> users-bounces@ovirt.org [mailto:user= s-bounces@ovirt.org] <b>Im Auftrag von </b>Mahdi Adnan<br><b>Gesendet:</b> = Samstag, 8. Juli 2017 09:35<br><b>An:</b> Ralf Schenk <rs@databay.de>= ; users@ovirt.org; ykaul@redhat.com<br><b>Betreff:</b> Re: [ovirt-users] Ve= ry poor GlusterFS performance<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=3DM= soNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div id=3Ddivtagdefaultwrapper><p><span style= =3D'font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>So ovirt access gluster vai FUSE ? i = thought its using libgfapi.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style=3D'font-fam= ily:"Calibri",sans-serif'>When can we expect it to work with libgfapi ?&nbs= p;<o:p></o:p></span></p><p><span style=3D'font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'= p;</o:p></p><div><p class=3DMsoNormal>Am 19.06.2017 um 17:23 schrieb Darrel= l Budic:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-b= ottom:5.0pt'><p class=3DMsoNormal>Chris- <o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=3DMso= Normal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal>You probably ne= ed to head over to <a href=3D"mailto:gluster-users@gluster.org">gluster-use= rs@gluster.org</a> for help with performance issues.<o:p></o:p></p></d= iv><div><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=3DMso= Normal>That said, what kind of performance are you getting, via some form o= r testing like bonnie++ or even dd runs? Raw bricks vs gluster performance = is useful to determine what kind of performance you’re actually getti= ng.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></di= v><div><p class=3DMsoNormal>Beyond that, I’d recommend dropping the a= rbiter bricks and re-adding them as full replicas, they can’t serve d= istributed data in this configuration and may be slowing things down on you= . If you’ve got a storage network setup, make sure it’s using t= he largest MTU it can, and consider adding/testing these settings that I us= e on my main storage volume:<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal>= <o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal><a href=3D"http:/= /performance.io">performance.io</a>-thread-count: 32<o:p></o:p></p></div><d= iv><p class=3DMsoNormal>client.event-threads: 8<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p= class=3DMsoNormal>server.event-threads: 3<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p clas= s=3DMsoNormal>performance.stat-prefetch: on<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div>= <p class=3DMsoNormal><br><br><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal= p></p></div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal> -Darrell<o:p></o:p></p></div><= div><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=3DMsoNorm= al><o:p> </o:p></p><div><blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-b= ottom:5.0pt'><div><p class=3DMsoNormal>On Jun 19, 2017, at 9:46 AM, Chris B= oot <<a href=3D"mailto:bootc@bootc.net">bootc@bootc.net</a>> wrote:<o= :p></o:p></p></div><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p c= lass=3DMsoNormal>Hi folks,<br><br>I have 3x servers in a "hyper-conver= ged" oVirt 4.1.2 + GlusterFS 3.10<br>configuration. My VMs run off a r= eplica 3 arbiter 1 volume comprised of<br>6 bricks, which themselves live o= n two SSDs in each of the servers (one<br>brick per SSD). The bricks are XF= S on LVM thin volumes straight onto the<br>SSDs. Connectivity is 10G Ethern= et.<br><br>Performance within the VMs is pretty terrible. I experience very= low<br>throughput and random IO is really bad: it feels like a latency iss= ue.<br>On my oVirt nodes the SSDs are not generally very busy. The 10G netw= ork<br>seems to run without errors (iperf3 gives bandwidth measurements of = >=3D<br>9.20 Gbits/sec between the three servers).<br><br>To put this in= to perspective: I was getting better behaviour from NFS4<br>on a gigabit co= nnection than I am with GlusterFS on 10G: that doesn't<br>feel right at all= .<br><br>My volume configuration looks like this:<br><br>Volume Name: vmssd= <br>Type: Distributed-Replicate<br>Volume ID: d5a5ddd1-a140-4e0d-b514-701cf= e464853<br>Status: Started<br>Snapshot Count: 0<br>Number of Bricks: 2 x (2= + 1) =3D 6<br>Transport-type: tcp<br>Bricks:<br>Brick1: ovirt3:/gluster/ss= d0_vmssd/brick<br>Brick2: ovirt1:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick<br>Brick3: ovirt= 2:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick (arbiter)<br>Brick4: ovirt3:/gluster/ssd1_vmssd= /brick<br>Brick5: ovirt1:/gluster/ssd1_vmssd/brick<br>Brick6: ovirt2:/glust= er/ssd1_vmssd/brick (arbiter)<br>Options Reconfigured:<br>nfs.disable: on<b= r>transport.address-family: inet6<br>performance.quick-read: off<br>perform= ance.read-ahead: off<br><a href=3D"http://performance.io">performance.io</a= html>= --_000_BFAB40933B3367488CE6299BAF8592D1014E52E492F3SOCRATESasl_-- --_004_BFAB40933B3367488CE6299BAF8592D1014E52E492F3SOCRATESasl_ Content-Type: image/gif; name="image001.gif" Content-Description: image001.gif Content-Disposition: inline; filename="image001.gif"; size=1250; creation-date="Sun, 09 Jul 2017 06:34:25 GMT"; modification-date="Sun, 09 Jul 2017 06:34:25 GMT" Content-ID: <image001.gif@01D2F8B7.C9A43050> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 R0lGODlhlwAeAMQAAObm5v9QVf/R0oKBgfDw8NfX105MTLi3t/r6+sfHx/+rrf98gC0sLP8LEhIQ EKalpf/g4ZmYmHd2dmppaf8uNP/y8v8cIv+Ym//AwkE/P46NjRwbG11cXP8ABwUDA////yH5BAAA AAAALAAAAACXAB4AAAX/4CeOYnUJZKqubOu+cCzPNA0tVnfVfO//wGAKk+t0Ap+KQMFUYCDCqHRK JVUWDaPRUsFktZ1G4AKtms9o1gKsFVS+7I5ll67bpd647hPQawNld4KDMQJFbA07F35aFBiEkJEp fXEBjx8KjI0Vkp2DEIdaCySgFBShbEgrCQOtrq+uEQcALQewrQUjEbe8rgkkD7y5KhMZB3drqSoV FQhdlHGXKQYe1dbX2BvHKwzY1RMiAN7j1xEjBeTmKeIeD3cYCxRfFigvChRxFJwkBBvk5A7cpZhA jgGCDwn+kfslgto4CSoSehh2BwEEBQvowDAUR0EKdArHZTg44oDCXBFC/3qj9SEluZEpHnjYQFIG gpo1KgSasYjNKBImrzF4NaFbNgIjCGRQeIyVKwneOLzScLCAg38OWI4Y4GECgQcSOEwYcADnh6/F NjAwoGFYAQ0atI4AAFeEFwsLFLiJUQEfGH0kNGADx8+oNQdIRQg+7NCaOhIgD8sVgYADNsPVGI5Y WjRqzQTdHDDIYHRDLokaUhCglkFEJi0NKJhl0RP2TsvXUg88KiLBVWsZrF6DmMKlNYMqglqTik1g uN8OBgAgkGCpB+L9ugK4iSCBvwEfECw1kILrBpa1jVCQIQBRvbP+rlEcQVAoSevWyv6uhpwE12uE kQAAZucpVw1xIsjkgf8B863mQVYteQATCZYJZJ5WBfij2wfpHcEeHGG8Z+BMszVWDXkfKLhceJhB SAJ+1ThH32AfRFZNayNAtUFiwFSTSwEHJIYAAQU84IADwyjIEALU9MchG+vFgIF7W2GDI2T7HfjB gNcgKQKMHmwjgnCSpeCbULRkdxhF1CDY40RjgmUAA/v1J5FAKW2gGSZscBFDMraNgJs1AYpAAGYP 5jJoNQ4Y4Gh8jpFgHH9mgbmWo1l6oA4C3Ygp6UwEIFBfNRtkMIBlKMLnAXgAXLWhXXH85EIFqMhG GZgDEKArABGAed0HI4bk5qgnprCYSt88B6dqS0FEEAMPJDCdCJYViur/B1BlwGMJqDTwnhqxJgUp o0ceOQ4D0yEakpMm/jqCRMgWm2I1j824Y6vLvuuPjHnqOJkIgP6xzwp5sCFNsCFp88Gxh11lrjfD cNrcCEx64/CD3iAHlQcMUEQXvcA+qBkBB4Q2X1CusjBlJdKMYAKI6g28MbKN5hJsBAXknHOwutn4 oFYqkpqAzjnPbE0u1PxmwAQGXLWBbvhuIIEGEnRjlAHO4SvhbCNAkwoGzEBwgV9U0lfu2WiXOkDE GaCdKgl0nk2YkWdPOCDabvaGdkAftL1LlgwCM+7Tq11V71IO7LkM2XE0YAHMYMhqqK6UV165CpaH ukLmiXFO8XSVzzakX+UH6TrmAajPNxfqByTQec41AeBPvSwIALkmAnuiexCsca3CBajgfsROuxcP A8kHQJX4DAIwjnsAvhsvfXHWKEwDAljg7sj03L9wwAQTxOWD2AE0YP75eCkwcPfs+xACADs= --_004_BFAB40933B3367488CE6299BAF8592D1014E52E492F3SOCRATESasl_--