Am Sonntag, den 06.04.2014, 19:15 -0700 schrieb Paul Jansen:
My mail client might mangle the bottom-posting here, so we'll see
how
it goes.
I saw a post from Fabian that he had re-enabled jenkins builds of the
node image based on Fedora 19/20 (but not yet including the VDSM
plugin). Presumably the main goal of this is to ensure that things in
node land are OK for an upcoming spin based on EL7?
EL7 is one point, but there were users also asking for Fedora based
Nodes and we use Fedora for development, to have stable Nodes (at some
point later) based on CentOS.
If ovirt does go back to having Fedora and EL based node images in
the
short term it would mean that live migration will work on the Fedora
images.
The Fedora based images are at least for now available from Jenkins.
If it was also decided to allow the EL based node image to include
the
recompiled qemu-kvm-rhev package the Ovirt release notes could then
say that when using an ovirt node image live migration is supported,
as is when a fedora install has the ovirt hypervisor packages
installed.
What is this ovirt hypervisor package you mention?
- fabian
It would only be that an EL based system - built up to then also
include the ovirt hypervisor packages - that live migration would not
be supported - at this stage.
This can change when the details are further worked out with the
Centos people about how the updated qemu-kvm packages will be hosted
and made available.
In the meantime, people that want to set things up so that live
migration is there can do so.
Once live migration is in place I think it would be interesting to try
and find out from people interested (or already testing ovirt) that
have VMware backgrounds/experience what they think is the the largest
outstanding issue feature wise when comparing ovirt to Vcenter. What
would stop them from migrating from vcenter to ovirt?