On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:03 PM Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:22 PM Dominik Holler <dholler(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:18 PM Gianluca Cecchi <
> gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:14 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:37 PM Gianluca Cecchi <
>>> gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> does oVirt 4.4. support management network distributed between routed
>>>> networks and not bound to a single one?
>>>> In some environments I see situations where there are 2 different
>>>> server farms with networks not necessarily mapped to the same ranges and
so
>>>> it could be useful to let oVirt hosts of the same cluster to be able to
>>>> communicate but not on the same physical network.
>>>> Eg vSphere can do it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Looks like more details are needed, like how such a network looks like.
>>>
>>> Dominic should know better about this.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Like server farm1 has its historically pre-defined/configured/ecc mgmnt
>> network on 10.4.167.x, while server farm2 on 10.4.169.x for example.
>> So hosts in server farm1 would have ip on the first one, while servers
>> in the server farm2 on the second one.
>> The two networks are routed.
>>
>>
> Thanks for sharing the scenario.
> Why might this scenario not work out of the box?
>
>
>> Gianluca
>>
>>
Based on this thread in late 2017
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/T7RGXRNY24O...
where I received an answer that for same cluster is not possible and no
other answers regarding instead its feasibility....
Even it is technically possible to have the same management network in two
IP subnetworks,
this would create a knot in my head because a logical network represents
usually a layer 2 network in oVirt.
What is the drawback of having a cluster with its own management network
per server farm?
Gianluca