Re: [Users] Sanlock issue when trying to start vm

On 06/22/2012 02:02 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 06/21/2012 12:04 AM, Robert Middleswarth wrote: >> On 06/20/2012 08:33 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >>> On 06/20/2012 08:17 AM, Rami Vaknin wrote: >>>> On 06/19/2012 09:36 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> after getting the 3.1 beta engine and a host set up I now get an error >>>>> when >>>>> trying to start a vm. >>>>> >>>>> Engine reports this: >>>>> VM myvm is down. Exit message: internal error Failed to open socket to >>>>> sanlock daemon: No such file or directory. >>>> Please take a look at the following bugs: >>>> >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832935 >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832056 >>> Thanks, after modprobe softdog and restarting wdmd and sanlock I was able >>> to start the VM. Unfortunately my experiment with using nested VMs to fake >>> nodes didn't pan out (the "guest-in-guest" booted for a bit and then froze). >>> >>> Is there a way to use pure qemu guests for testing (like in devstack)? >>> While I do have two systems that support hardware virtualization i cannot >>> reinstall either of them to use them as a host. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dennis >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> Users(a)ovirt.org >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> The CentOS builds include a plugin called vdsm-hook-simpleqemu I think I >> saw the hook sitting in Git as well so that plug-in might do what you are >> looking for? > > Hm, looks like it but that doesn't seem to be available for the regular > builds. The is a vdsm-hook-faqemu package though which when comparing the > code seems to do a similar thing (it also uses the "fake_kvm_support" > setting from vdsm.conf like simpleqemu). > Is the latter maybe a replacement of the former? > Hm, i tried this but I still get the message "Domain requires KVM, but it is not available."