Re: [ovirt-users] Failed to start self hosted engine after upgrading oVirt to 4.0

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:08:33AM +0200, Stefano Danzi wrote: > Hi! Thanks for the detailed logging! > > The broker error is: > > ==> /var/log/ovirt-hosted-engine-ha/agent.log <== > MainThread::INFO::2016-06-27 09:27:03,311::brokerlink::140::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.lib.brokerlink.BrokerLink::(start_monitor) > Success, id 140293563619152 > > ==> /var/log/ovirt-hosted-engine-ha/broker.log <== > Thread-25::ERROR::2016-06-27 09:27:03,314::listener::182::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.broker.listener.ConnectionHandler::(handle) > Error while serving connection > Traceback (most recent call last): > File > "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_hosted_engine_ha/broker/listener.py", > line 166, in handle > data) > File > "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_hosted_engine_ha/broker/listener.py", > line 299, in _dispatch > .set_storage_domain(client, sd_type, **options) > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_hosted_engine_ha/broker/storage_broker.py", > line 66, in set_storage_domain > self._backends[client].connect() > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_hosted_engine_ha/lib/storage_backends.py", > line 400, in connect > volUUID=volume.volume_uuid > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_hosted_engine_ha/lib/storage_backends.py", > line 245, in _get_volume_path > volUUID We have two issues here. First is that https://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-hosted-engine-ha.git;a=blob;f=ovi... is still using vdscli to contact vdsm, instead of the preferred jsonrpccli.

The second is that vdscli.connect's heuristic ends up reading the local server address from vdsm config, where it finds the default ipv6-local address of "::". Please try setting [addresses] management_ip='0.0.0.0' in your /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf instead of the crontab hacks. Would you please open a bug about the two issues (ovirt-hosted-engine-ha and vdsm networking)? Would you report the output of `netstats -nltp` on your host, as I do not completely understand why no interface (not even the loopback one) was listening on ipv6? Regards, Dan.