<br></div><div>- Two Dell R710 with 128 gigs of ram.</div><div><span style= =3D"font-size: 12pt;">- A third dell server for ovirt-engine.</span></div><=
------=_Part_27854792_967363234.1405525563715 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, We have a production environment with KVM+centos6 and we want to switch to ovirt. At this moment we have 12 VM on three independent server. This VMs uses the local disks of servers, we don't have a central storage. currently we have for ovirt - Two Dell R710 with 128 gigs of ram. - A third dell server for ovirt-engine. - four 1 gb/sec NICs/ server. - Smart GB switch we would like make an ovirt environment with - clusterized, redundant filesystem, data loss protection - If a host goes to down the VMs could made a restart on the remain host - LACP/bonding (mode 6) for fast I/O beetwen gluster hosts, we don't have 10Gbe nics - 8 TB of disk capacity for VMs we don't want: - using hw raid on servers, because we need free disk tray for more capacity My questions. - Which glusterfs method is the best for us for performance? - Can I make a real "performance" disk i/o by 4-4 NICs ? Or I need 10 Gbe nic for this? - How much disk need for good redundancy/performance? 4/server or 2/server ? - What will the weak point our project? Thanks in advance. Tibor ------=_Part_27854792_967363234.1405525563715 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><body><div style=3D"font-family: times new roman, new york, times, se= rif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>We = have a production environment with KVM+centos6 and we want to switch to ovi= rt.</div><div>At this moment we have 12 VM on three independent server.&nbs= p;</div><div>This VMs uses the local disks of servers, we don't have a cent= ral storage.</div><div><br></div><div>currently we have for ovirt</div><div= div><span style=3D"font-size: 12pt;">- four 1 gb/sec NICs/ server.</span></= div><div><span style=3D"font-size: 12pt;">- Smart GB switch</span></div><di= v><br></div><div>we would like make an ovirt environment with</div><div><br=
</div><div>- clusterized, redundant filesystem, data loss protection</div>= <div>- If a host goes to down the VMs could made a restart on the remain ho= st</div><div>- LACP/bonding (mode 6) for fast I/O beetwen gluster hosts, we= don't have 10Gbe nics</div><div>- 8 TB of disk capacity for VMs</div><div>= <br></div><div>we don't want:</div><div><br></div><div>- using hw raid on s= ervers, because we need free disk tray for more capacity</div><div><br></di= v><div>My questions.</div><div><br></div><div>- Which glusterfs method is t= he best for us for performance?</div><div>- Can I make a real "performance"= disk i/o by 4-4 NICs ? Or I need 10 Gbe nic for this?</div><di= v>- How much disk need for good redundancy/performance? 4/server or 2/serve= r ? </div><div>- What will the weak point our project?</div><div><br><= /div><div>Thanks in advance.</div><div><br></div><div>Tibor</div><div><br><= /div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></bo= dy></html> ------=_Part_27854792_967363234.1405525563715--