------=_Part_10347032_1285155864.1418653581057 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Very needed functionality IMHO, even currently partially supported for cloning guest-vms using KVM and NetApp: http://captainkvm.com/2011/11/offload-cloning-from-kvm-to-the-back-end-stora... Thanks in advance. Best regards, Nikolai ____________________ Nikolai Sednev Senior Quality Engineer at Compute team Red Hat Israel 34 Jerusalem Road, Ra'anana, Israel 43501 Tel: +972 9 7692043 Mobile: +972 52 7342734 Email: nsednev@redhat.com IRC: nsednev ----- Original Message ----- From: users-request@ovirt.org To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 3:13:32 PM Subject: Users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 81 Send Users mailing list submissions to users@ovirt.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to users-request@ovirt.org You can reach the person managing the list at users-owner@ovirt.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: storage offload capability (Paul Jansen) 2. Re: [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z (Gianluca Cecchi) 3. Re: How to update zanata's source text ? (Alexander Wels) 4. Re: [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z (Sandro Bonazzola) 5. Re: [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z (Gianluca Cecchi) 6. Re: [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z (Sandro Bonazzola) 7. Re: [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z (Gianluca Cecchi) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:37:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Paul Jansen <vlaero@yahoo.com.au> To: Itamar Heim <iheim@redhat.com>, users <users@ovirt.org> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] storage offload capability Message-ID: <1885607432.201949.1418643444273.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10632.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Thanks Itamar.I heard the other day that NFS v4.2 is supposed to contain server side copy, so it's possible that we might see this kind of support in one of more storage domain available to ovirt at some stage perhaps next year (in Fedora at least).Is this something that Gluster will also likely provide in a subsequent release once we have proper gfapi support? I'd be interested to hear if others on the list are clamouring for server side offload support in some form. From: Itamar Heim To: Paul Jansen ; users Sent: Saturday, 13 December 2014, 2:16 Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] storage offload capability On 11/13/2014 06:09 AM, Paul Jansen wrote:
I have an ovirt 3.5 cluster set up with three el7 hosts.? Storage is provided by two Fedora 20 machines and the connection is via multipath iscsi. The performance is quite good.? The Fedora 20 iscsi targets are using the 'target' (ie: lio) framework, which support the various t.10 scsi offloads.? Vmware supports a subset of these called VAAI and Microsoft has a subset called ODX. Cloning is one if the t.10 extensions that the lio target framework supports. I just tried cloning a vm and noticed that during the process there is a lof of traffic over the iscsi interfaces on the Storage Pool Manager host and the iscsi target machine. With proper support for t.10 cloning I shoudn't see any traffic on the isci links (or very minimal traffic) Is there some way to enable the storage offload functionality in Ovirt? If not, is this on the VDSM roadmap?? If support were worked in this should be able to be applied to FCP connections as well.? The lio target supports these offloads when acting as a Fiber Channel target also.
I've asked this sometime back but there hasn't been much in the way of discussion on this users list or the devel list about this feature.
yes, on the roadmap, tbd yet on when. netapp did a plugin enabling this for their storage array (VSC plugin) I hope the ceph integration will provide this, though that doesn't solve it for other type of storage domains yet. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141215/7280fe9d/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:30:05 +0100 From: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> To: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> Cc: "Users@ovirt.org" <Users@ovirt.org>, "devel@ovirt.org" <devel@ovirt.org> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z Message-ID: <CAG2kNCxxvvjZ530jmboBGC4uvUj9+qVa0M_4baNPRiiE0cAnsQ@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, We have proposed Fedora 21 support as oVirt 3.6.0 new feature. oVirt 3.5.z is now in maintenance phase so no new features should be added. Supporting Fedora 21 is not just re-building everything on Fedora 21, it requires changes in several packages. My question is, is there community interest in having Fedora 21 support for oVirt 3.5.z while still having Fedora 20 as actively supported distribution?
Back in May (see http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-May/024004.html and following answers) we talked about Fedora Server and that Fedora 21 Server would have been a preview of that... Now that it is out officially, it would be nice to see if oVirt Hypervisor/Engine could become sort of Server Roles, as stated at https://getfedora.org/en/server/ " Server Roles and Rolekit There's no need to set up your server from scratch when you use server roles. Server roles plug into your Fedora Server system, providing a well-integrated service on top of the Fedora Server platform. Deploy and manage these prepared roles simply using the Rolekit tool. " Gianluca -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141215/78f95c51/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 07:45:41 -0500 From: Alexander Wels <awels@redhat.com> To: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] How to update zanata's source text ? Message-ID: <3574173.gs5KEaG2Rv@awels> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Sunday, December 14, 2014 03:03:56 PM plysan wrote:
Hi,
When I'm trying to compile ovirt-engine-3.5 branch with pulled zanata source files, I get webadmin compilation errors. And the error message lead me to the outdated zanata translation file: org.ovirt.engine.ui.webadmin.ApplicationMessages The file has a source text called "{0} (VLAN {1})", but recent commit b068ec755198c27e65f936809104ba5068cd8fd2 has changed the text to "(VLAN {0})"
So is there a way to update the zanata's source text (text on the left) ? It seems that I don't get any options to update it, I can only update the target text (text on the right).
thanks.
The zanata source text is generated from default values from the ovirt source code. Einav should know more about exactly how that is done. You should always match the translation to the source and not the other way around. So I am not sure why you are trying to change the source. ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:48:16 +0100 From: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> To: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> Cc: "Users@ovirt.org" <Users@ovirt.org>, "devel@ovirt.org" <devel@ovirt.org> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z Message-ID: <548ED890.9040307@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Il 15/12/2014 13:30, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com <mailto:sbonazzo@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi, We have proposed Fedora 21 support as oVirt 3.6.0 new feature. oVirt 3.5.z is now in maintenance phase so no new features should be added. Supporting Fedora 21 is not just re-building everything on Fedora 21, it requires changes in several packages. My question is, is there community interest in having Fedora 21 support for oVirt 3.5.z while still having Fedora 20 as actively supported distribution?
Back in May (see http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2014-May/024004.html and following answers) we talked about Fedora Server and that Fedora 21 Server would have been a preview of that...
Now that it is out officially, it would be nice to see if oVirt Hypervisor/Engine could become sort of Server Roles, as stated at https://getfedora.org/en/server/
" Server Roles and Rolekit There's no need to set up your server from scratch when you use server roles. Server roles plug into your Fedora Server system, providing a well-integrated service on top of the Fedora Server platform. Deploy and manage these prepared roles simply using the Rolekit tool. "
I suggest to open a RFE in bugzilla for it, but it won't be in 3.5.z. I'm not even sure if we can make it for 3.6. BTW I think it's an interesting RFE.
Gianluca
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:10:18 +0100 From: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> To: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> Cc: "Users@ovirt.org" <Users@ovirt.org>, "devel@ovirt.org" <devel@ovirt.org> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z Message-ID: <CAG2kNCzvaAQTm7zR3Kn8CsQYi20w5A3jKiCMFje_-s-P=E7eCw@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
I suggest to open a RFE in bugzilla for it, but it won't be in 3.5.z. I'm not even sure if we can make it for 3.6. BTW I think it's an interesting RFE.
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
Bugzilla created against ovirt-engine-installer and version 4.0: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174236 Do you think it is better to create another one specifically for oVirt Hypervisor? And in that case against what component? Gianluca -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141215/973e004e/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:12:02 +0100 From: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> To: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> Cc: Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@redhat.com>, "Users@ovirt.org" <Users@ovirt.org>, "devel@ovirt.org" <devel@ovirt.org> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z Message-ID: <548EDE22.5040603@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Il 15/12/2014 14:10, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com <mailto:sbonazzo@redhat.com>> wrote:
I suggest to open a RFE in bugzilla for it, but it won't be in 3.5.z. I'm not even sure if we can make it for 3.6. BTW I think it's an interesting RFE.
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com <http://redhat.com>
Bugzilla created against ovirt-engine-installer and version 4.0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174236
Do you think it is better to create another one specifically for oVirt Hypervisor? And in that case against what component?
Fabian?
Gianluca
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:13:29 +0100 From: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> To: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> Cc: Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@redhat.com>, "Users@ovirt.org" <Users@ovirt.org>, "devel@ovirt.org" <devel@ovirt.org> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z Message-ID: <CAG2kNCxgC68TcYFJhdRs7_oWJnM4JF7XRekDWU4bz5dnWhmG8g@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Il 15/12/2014 14:10, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com <mailto:sbonazzo@redhat.com>> wrote:
I suggest to open a RFE in bugzilla for it, but it won't be in 3.5.z. I'm not even sure if we can make it for 3.6. BTW I think it's an interesting RFE.
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community
collaboration. > See how it works at redhat.com <http://redhat.com> > > > Bugzilla created against ovirt-engine-installer and version 4.0: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174236 > > Do you think it is better to create another one specifically for oVirt Hypervisor? And in that case against what component?
Fabian?
Gianluca
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com
------------------------------<br><div><br></div>Message: 2<br>Date: Mon, = 15 Dec 2014 13:30:05 +0100<br>From: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gma= il.com><br>To: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com><br>Cc: "User= s@ovirt.org" <Users@ovirt.org>, "devel@ovirt.org"<br> &nbs=
well-integrated service on top of the Fedora Server platform. Deploy and<b= r>manage these prepared roles simply using the Rolekit tool.<br>"<br><div><= br></div>Gianluca<br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML att= achment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/= attachments/20141215/78f95c51/attachment-0001.html><br><div><br></div>--= ----------------------------<br><div><br></div>Message: 3<br>Date: Mon, 15 = Dec 2014 07:45:41 -0500<br>From: Alexander Wels <awels@redhat.com><br= To: users@ovirt.org<br>Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] How to update zanata's s= ource text ?<br>Message-ID: <3574173.gs5KEaG2Rv@awels><br>Content-Typ= e: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii"<br><div><br></div>On Sunday, December 1= 4, 2014 03:03:56 PM plysan wrote:<br>> Hi,<br>> <br>> When I'm try= ing to compile ovirt-engine-3.5 branch with pulled zanata<br>> source fi= les, I get webadmin compilation errors. And the error message lead<br>> = me to the outdated zanata translation<br>> file: org.ovirt.engine.ui.web= admin.ApplicationMessages<br>> The file has a source text called "{0} (V= LAN {1})", but recent commit<br>> b068ec755198c27e65f936809104ba5068cd8f= d2<br>> has changed the text to "(VLAN {0})"<br>> <br>> So is ther= e a way to update the zanata's source text (text on the left) ?<br>> It = seems that I don't get any options to update it, I can only update the<br>&= gt; target text (text on the right).<br>> <br>> thanks.<br><div><br><= /div>The zanata source text is generated from default values from the ovirt=
<div><br></div><br>------------------------------<br><div><br></div>Messag= e: 4<br>Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:48:16 +0100<br>From: Sandro Bonazzola <= ;sbonazzo@redhat.com><br>To: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.c= om><br>Cc: "Users@ovirt.org" <Users@ovirt.org>, "devel@ovirt.org"<= br> <devel@ovirt.org><= br>Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z<br>Mes= sage-ID: <548ED890.9040307@redhat.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; c= harset=3Dutf-8<br><div><br></div>Il 15/12/2014 13:30, Gianluca Cecchi ha sc= ritto:<br>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbona= zzo@redhat.com <mailto:sbonazzo@redhat.com>> wrote:<br>> <br>&g= t; Hi,<br>> We have proposed Fedora 21 suppo= rt as oVirt 3.6.0 new feature.<br>> oVirt 3.5.z is now in =
BTW: I put [RFE] at beginning of subject. I hope it is sufficient to mark it as an enhancement bugzilla entry... Gianluca -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141215/870c20b7/attachment.html> ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users End of Users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 81 ************************************* ------=_Part_10347032_1285155864.1418653581057 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><body><div style=3D"font-family: georgia,serif; font-size: 12pt; colo= r: #000000"><div>Very needed functionality IMHO, even currently partially s= upported for cloning guest-vms using KVM and NetApp:</div><div><a href=3D"h= ttp://captainkvm.com/2011/11/offload-cloning-from-kvm-to-the-back-end-stora= ge/" data-mce-href=3D"http://captainkvm.com/2011/11/offload-cloning-from-kv= m-to-the-back-end-storage/">http://captainkvm.com/2011/11/offload-cloning-f= rom-kvm-to-the-back-end-storage/</a></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><di= v><span name=3D"x"></span><br>Thanks in advance.<br><div><br></div>Best reg= ards,<br>Nikolai<br>____________________<br>Nikolai Sednev<br>Senior Qualit= y Engineer at Compute team<br>Red Hat Israel<br>34 Jerusalem Road,<br>Ra'an= ana, Israel 43501<br><div><br></div>Tel: +972 9= 7692043<br>Mobile: +972 52 7342734<br>Email: nsednev@redhat.com<br>IRC: ns= ednev<span name=3D"x"></span><br></div><div><br></div><hr id=3D"zwchr"><div= style=3D"color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:n= one;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: </b>us= ers-request@ovirt.org<br><b>To: </b>users@ovirt.org<br><b>Sent: </b>Monday,= December 15, 2014 3:13:32 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Users Digest, Vol 39, Issu= e 81<br><div><br></div>Send Users mailing list submissions to<br> &nbs= p; users@ovirt.org<br><div><br></div>To = subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br> = ; http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/user= s<br>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br> = users-request@ovirt.org<br><div><= br></div>You can reach the person managing the list at<br> = ; users-owner@ovirt.org<br><div><br></div>When= replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>than "Re= : Contents of Users digest..."<br><div><br></div><br>Today's Topics:<br><di= v><br></div> 1. Re: storage offload capability (Paul Jans= en)<br> 2. Re: [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z (Gi= anluca Cecchi)<br> 3. Re: How to update zanata's source t= ext ? (Alexander Wels)<br> 4. Re: [RFI] Fedora 21 support= on oVirt 3.5.z (Sandro Bonazzola)<br> 5. Re: [RFI] Fedor= a 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z (Gianluca Cecchi)<br> 6. Re: = [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z (Sandro Bonazzola)<br> 7= . Re: [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z (Gianluca Cecchi)<br><di= v><br></div><br>-----------------------------------------------------------= -----------<br><div><br></div>Message: 1<br>Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:37:24= +0000 (UTC)<br>From: Paul Jansen <vlaero@yahoo.com.au><br>To: Itamar= Heim <iheim@redhat.com>, users <users@ovirt.org><br>Subject: R= e: [ovirt-users] storage offload capability<br>Message-ID:<br> &= nbsp; <1885607432.201949.1418643444273.Java= Mail.yahoo@jws10632.mail.bf1.yahoo.com><br> = ; <br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"utf-8"<br><div>= <br></div>Thanks Itamar.I heard the other day that NFS v4.2 is supposed to = contain server side copy, so it's possible that we might see this kind of s= upport in one of more storage domain available to ovirt at some stage perha= ps next year (in Fedora at least).Is this something that Gluster will also = likely provide in a subsequent release once we have proper gfapi support?<b= r>I'd be interested to hear if others on the list are clamouring for server= side offload support in some form.<br><div><br></div> &= nbsp;From: Itamar Heim<br> To: Paul Jansen ; users <br> Sent: Sat= urday, 13 December 2014, 2:16<br> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] storage o= ffload capability<br> <br>On 11/13/2014 06:09 AM, Paul Jansen w= rote:<br><div><br></div><br>> I have an ovirt 3.5 cluster set up with th= ree el7 hosts.? Storage is<br>> provided by two Fedora 20 machines and t= he connection is via multipath<br>> iscsi.<br>> The performance is qu= ite good.? The Fedora 20 iscsi targets are using<br>> the 'target' (ie: = lio) framework, which support the various t.10 scsi<br>> offloads.? Vmwa= re supports a subset of these called VAAI and Microsoft<br>> has a subse= t called ODX.<br>> Cloning is one if the t.10 extensions that the lio ta= rget framework<br>> supports.<br>> I just tried cloning a vm and noti= ced that during the process there is a<br>> lof of traffic over the iscs= i interfaces on the Storage Pool Manager<br>> host and the iscsi target = machine.<br>> With proper support for t.10 cloning I shoudn't see any tr= affic on the<br>> isci links (or very minimal traffic)<br>> Is there = some way to enable the storage offload functionality in Ovirt?<br>> If n= ot, is this on the VDSM roadmap?? If support were worked in this<br>> sh= ould be able to be applied to FCP connections as well.? The lio target<br>&= gt; supports these offloads when acting as a Fiber Channel target also.<br>= ><br>> I've asked this sometime back but there hasn't been much in th= e way of<br>> discussion on this users list or the devel list about this= feature.<br>><br><div><br></div>yes, on the roadmap, tbd yet on when. n= etapp did a plugin enabling this <br>for their storage array (VSC plugin)<b= r>I hope the ceph integration will provide this, though that doesn't solve = <br>it for other type of storage domains yet.<br><div><br></div><br><div><b= r></div> <br>-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML = attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/use= rs/attachments/20141215/7280fe9d/attachment-0001.html><br><div><br></div= p; <devel@ovirt.org><br>Subject: Re: [ov= irt-users] [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z<br>Message-ID:<br> &= nbsp; <CAG2kNCxxvvjZ530jmboBGC4uvUj9+= qVa0M_4baNPRiiE0cAnsQ@mail.gmail.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; chars= et=3D"utf-8"<br><div><br></div>On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Sandro Bon= azzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com><br>wrote:<br>><br>> Hi,<br>> We= have proposed Fedora 21 support as oVirt 3.6.0 new feature.<br>> oVirt = 3.5.z is now in maintenance phase so no new features should be added.<br>&g= t; Supporting Fedora 21 is not just re-building everything on Fedora 21, it= <br>> requires changes in several packages.<br>> My question is, is t= here community interest in having Fedora 21 support<br>> for oVirt 3.5.z= while still having Fedora 20 as actively supported<br>> distribution?<b= r>><br>><br>Back in May (see http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2= 014-May/024004.html<br>and following answers) we talked about Fedora Server= and that Fedora 21<br>Server would have been a preview of that...<br><div>= <br></div>Now that it is out officially, it would be nice to see if oVirt<b= r>Hypervisor/Engine could become sort of Server Roles, as stated at<br>http= s://getfedora.org/en/server/<br><div><br></div>"<br>Server Roles and Roleki= t<br>There's no need to set up your server from scratch when you use server= <br>roles. Server roles plug into your Fedora Server system, providing a<br= source <br>code. Einav should know more about exactly how that is done. Yo= u should always <br>match the translation to the source and not the other w= ay around. So I am not <br>sure why you are trying to change the source.<br= maintenance phase so no new features should be added.<br>> = Supporting Fedora 21 is not just re-building everything on Fedora 21, it r= equires changes in several packages.<br>> My question is, = is there community interest in having Fedora 21 support for oVirt 3.5.z whi= le still having Fedora 20 as actively supported<br>> distr= ibution?<br>> <br>> <br>> Back in May (see http://lists.ovirt.org/= pipermail/users/2014-May/024004.html and following answers) we talked about= Fedora Server and that Fedora 21<br>> Server would have been a preview = of that...<br>> <br>> Now that it is out officially, it would be nice= to see if oVirt Hypervisor/Engine could become sort of Server Roles, as st= ated at <br>> https://getfedora.org/en/server/<br>>; <br>> "<br>>= ; Server Roles and Rolekit<br>> There's no need to set up your server fr= om scratch when you use server roles. Server roles plug into your Fedora Se= rver system, providing a<br>> well-integrated service on top of the Fedo= ra Server platform. Deploy and manage these prepared roles simply using the= Rolekit tool.<br>> "<br>> <br><div><br></div>I suggest to open a RFE= in bugzilla for it, but it won't be in 3.5.z. I'm not even sure if we can = make it for 3.6.<br>BTW I think it's an interesting RFE.<br><div><br></div>= > Gianluca<br>> <br><div><br></div><br>-- <br>Sandro Bonazzola<br>Bet= ter technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.<br>S= ee how it works at redhat.com<br><div><br></div><br>-----------------------= -------<br><div><br></div>Message: 5<br>Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:10:18 +01= 00<br>From: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com><br>To: Sandro= Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com><br>Cc: "Users@ovirt.org" <Users@o= virt.org>, "devel@ovirt.org"<br> &nbs= p; <devel@ovirt.org><br>Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] Fedora = 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z<br>Message-ID:<br> &= nbsp; <CAG2kNCzvaAQTm7zR3Kn8CsQYi20w5A3jKiCMFje_-s-P=3DE7eCw@= mail.gmail.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"utf-8"<br><div><= br></div>On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@red= hat.com><br>wrote:<br>><br>><br>> I suggest to open a RFE in bu= gzilla for it, but it won't be in 3.5.z. I'm<br>> not even sure if we ca= n make it for 3.6.<br>> BTW I think it's an interesting RFE.<br>><br>= > --<br>> Sandro Bonazzola<br>> Better technology. Faster innovati= on. Powered by community collaboration.<br>> See how it works at redhat.= com<br>><br><div><br></div>Bugzilla created against ovirt-engine-install= er and version 4.0:<br><div><br></div>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.= cgi?id=3D1174236<br><div><br></div>Do you think it is better to create anot= her one specifically for oVirt<br>Hypervisor? And in that case against what= component?<br><div><br></div>Gianluca<br>-------------- next part --------= ------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>URL: <http://lists.ovirt= .org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141215/973e004e/attachment-0001.html>= <br><div><br></div>------------------------------<br><div><br></div>Message= : 6<br>Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:12:02 +0100<br>From: Sandro Bonazzola <= sbonazzo@redhat.com><br>To: Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.co= m><br>Cc: Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@redhat.com>, "Users@ovirt.org"<= br> <Users@ovirt.org>,= "devel@ovirt.org" <devel= @ovirt.org><br>Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] Fedora 21 support on oVi= rt 3.5.z<br>Message-ID: <548EDE22.5040603@redhat.com><br>Content-Type= : text/plain; charset=3Dutf-8<br><div><br></div>Il 15/12/2014 14:10, Gianlu= ca Cecchi ha scritto:<br>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Sandro Bonaz= zola <sbonazzo@redhat.com <mailto:sbonazzo@redhat.com>> wrote:<= br>> <br>> <br>> I suggest to open a RFE in bugzilla= for it, but it won't be in 3.5.z. I'm not even sure if we can make it for = 3.6.<br>> BTW I think it's an interesting RFE.<br>> <br=
> --<br>> Sandro Bonazzola<br>> = ; Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collabo= ration.<br>> See how it works at redhat.com <http://red= hat.com><br>> <br>> <br>> Bugzilla created against ovirt-engine= -installer and version 4.0:<br>> <br>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh= ow_bug.cgi?id=3D1174236 <br>> <br>> Do you think it is better to crea= te another one specifically for oVirt Hypervisor? And in that case against = what component?<br><div><br></div>Fabian?<br><div><br></div>> <br>> G= ianluca<br><div><br></div><br>-- <br>Sandro Bonazzola<br>Better technology.= Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.<br>See how it works= at redhat.com<br><div><br></div><br>------------------------------<br><div= <br></div>Message: 7<br>Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:13:29 +0100<br>From: Gia= nluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com><br>To: Sandro Bonazzola <= sbonazzo@redhat.com><br>Cc: Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@redhat.com>, = "Users@ovirt.org"<br> <Us= ers@ovirt.org>, "devel@ov= irt.org" <devel@ovirt.org><br>Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] Fedora= 21 support on oVirt 3.5.z<br>Message-ID:<br> = <CAG2kNCxgC68TcYFJhdRs7_oWJnM4JF7XRekDWU4bz5dnWhmG8g@m= ail.gmail.com><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"utf-8"<br><div><b= r></div>On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redh= at.com><br>wrote:<br>><br>> Il 15/12/2014 14:10, Gianluca Cecchi h= a scritto:<br>> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Sandro Bonazzola &= lt;sbonazzo@redhat.com<br>> <mailto:sbonazzo@redhat.com>> wrote= :<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > I suggest to open a = RFE in bugzilla for it, but it won't be in<br>> 3.5.z. I'm not even sure= if we can make it for 3.6.<br>> > BTW I think it's an = interesting RFE.<br>> ><br>> > --<br>> > &n= bsp; Sandro Bonazzola<br>> > Better technology. = Faster innovation. Powered by community<br>> collaboration.<br>> >= See how it works at redhat.com <http://redhat.com><br>= > ><br>> ><br>> > Bugzilla created against ovirt-engine-i= nstaller and version 4.0:<br>> ><br>> > https://bugzilla.redhat= .com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1174236<br>> ><br>> > Do you think it is= better to create another one specifically for oVirt<br>> Hypervisor? An= d in that case against what component?<br>><br>> Fabian?<br>><br>&= gt; ><br>> > Gianluca<br>><br>><br>> --<br>> Sandro Bo= nazzola<br>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community =
collaboration.<br>> See how it works at redhat.com<br>><br><div><br><= /div>BTW: I put [RFE] at beginning of subject. I hope it is sufficient to m= ark<br>it as an enhancement bugzilla entry...<br><div><br></div>Gianluca<br= >-------------- next part --------------<br>An HTML attachment was scrubbed= ...<br>URL: <http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141215= /870c20b7/attachment.html><br><div><br></div>---------------------------= ---<br><div><br></div>_______________________________________________<br>Us= ers mailing list<br>Users@ovirt.org<br>http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listi= nfo/users<br><div><br></div><br>End of Users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 81<br>**= ***********************************<br></div><div><br></div></div></body></= html> ------=_Part_10347032_1285155864.1418653581057--