Re: [Users] oVirt 3.4 test day - Template Versions

From: "Omer Frenkel" <ofrenkel(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Federico Simoncelli" <fsimonce(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: "oVirt Users List" <users(a)ovirt.org&gt;, "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com&gt; Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 4:31:56 PM Subject: Re: oVirt 3.4 test day - Template Versions Thanks for the feedback! much appreciated. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Federico Simoncelli" <fsimonce(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "oVirt Users List" <users(a)ovirt.org&gt; > Cc: "Omer Frenkel" <ofrenkel(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com&gt; > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 5:12:38 PM > Subject: oVirt 3.4 test day - Template Versions > > Feature tested: > > http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Template_Versions > > - create a new vm vm1 and make a template template1 from it > - create a new vm vm2 based on template1 and make some changes > - upgrade to 3.4 > - create a new template template1.1 from vm2 > - create a new vm vm3 from template1 (clone) - content ok > - create a new vm vm4 from template1.1 (thin) - content ok > - create a new vm vm5 from template1 last (thin) - content ok (same as 1.1) > - try to remove template1 (failed as template1.1 is still present) > - try to remove template1.1 (failed as vm5 is still present) > - create a new vm vm6 and make a template blank1.1 as new version of the > blank template (succeeded) > - create a vm pool vmpool1 with the "latest" template from template1 > - create a vm pool vmpool2 with the "template1.1" (last) template from > template1 > - start vmpool1 and vmpool2 and verify that the content is the same > - create a new template template1.2 > - start vmpool1 and verify that the content is the same as latest > (template1.2) > - start vmpool2 and verify that the content is the same as template1.1 > > Suggestions: > > - the template blank is special, I am not sure if allowing versioning may > be confusing (for example is not even editable) right, i also thought about this, and my thought was not to block the user from doing this, but if it was confusing we better block it. > - as far as I can see the "Sub Version Name" is not editable anymore (after > picking it) thanks, i see its missing in the UI, do you care to open a bug on that?