It "kind of" worked.
I did an insert into the database to add an "xvm" fence mode.
After that I had to first change the mode to ipmilan to get
rid of a couple of mandatory fields. The setup also breaks
when I try to edit a host.
The fence mechanism makes a couple of assumptions that
don't work with fence-virtd:
- fence-virtd uses a keyfile, no username and password.
- fence-virtd uses port=vmname to identify a VM
The gui has mandatory username and password fields and
the standard port/sshport field only takes numeric values.
Some of the problems I ran into are probably related to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020344
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Eli Mesika <emesika(a)redhat.com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Sander Grendelman" <sander(a)grendelman.com>
> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org, "Eli Mesika" <emesika(a)redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 3:04:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [Users] Fence-virt support
>
> On 11/13/2013 04:27 PM, Sander Grendelman wrote:
> > I'm running an ovirt environment (two virt hosts and one engine host)
> > on libvirt/kvm on fedora 19. (nested KVM).
> >
> > I want to fence the virtualized virtualization hosts from the engine host
> > (or their partner host) through libvirt. Fence-virt can do this.
> >
> > I know this is a bit of a niche case, but it's very useful for testing/demo
> > purposes.
>
> you can just edit the configs to add it (may be overridden during upgrade):
> VdsFenceType, VdsFenceOptionMapping and VdsFenceOptionTypes
Did that worked for you or do you need any further help?
Thanks
Eli
>
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Itamar Heim <iheim(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >> On 11/13/2013 07:47 AM, Sander Grendelman wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm currently building a ovirt test-environment using nested
> >>> virtualization on libvirt/kvm.
> >>>
> >>> For the most part this works great. However, I can't configure
> >>> fencing/power management
> >>> because only hardware BMC's/fencing devices are supported.
> >>>
> >>> Is this something that could/should be included in a future oVirt
> >>> version?
> >>> Or is there another option/workaround to test power management?
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Users mailing list
> >>> Users(a)ovirt.org
> >>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>>
> >>
> >> please elaborate a bit more on what's missing.
> >> what are you trying to fence and from where?
>
>