On 04/16/2013 12:21 AM, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
Thanks Martin,
I tested on a "almost" empty host I had to play with, and it seemed all went well, so will hopefully be able to regain ~11 GB of memory after restarting libvirtd :) ..
I'll sign up to the other mailing list to find out why / how it could have grown this big :\
There might be some memleaks, especially in older version. For this kind of stuff, I'd maybe use the libvir-list [1] Martin [1] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Thanks Alex
On 04/15/2013 04:12 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 04/15/2013 03:39 PM, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
Hi,
I believe it's save, but just wanted to re-check, is it save to restart libvirtd on a HV running ~40 VMs ?
Hi,
for libvirt questions, I'd rather use libvirt-users@redhat.com, but for this particular one, I can confirm that libvirt is written in a way that enables it to be restarted without any impact on the machines which are being ran.
Of course I can't say "nothing will happen" due to the fact that every single time something can happen, but nothing _should_ happen to any of your machines.
Have a nice day, Martin