On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Dan Yasny wrote:
Seriously, not a good idea. The Engine is supposed to be looking at the setup, and not be in the setup, where it may be affected by the problems that might occur to the setup. I'm pretty sure there's lots of though being devoted to removing this limitation, but when we say it's a bad idea, it really is, it's not like we simply want you to run an extra machine
Hmm, find it hard to believe that people are not going to want to run management on the cluster.
That's easier than block storage, but still, what happens if the host where the engine was running failed - who would update VM statuses and restart the HA VMs?
Don't I also run into similar problems if my dedicated host where the engine was running fails?
<> Nathan Stratton CTO, BlinkMind, Inc. nathan at robotics.net nathan at blinkmind.com http://www.robotics.net http://www.blinkmind.com