On 05/08/2014 12:59 PM, Sven Kieske wrote:
May I ask if there is any reason why this is so inconsistent? (id vs name)
I guess it is for historical reasons. We should probably accept both id and name in both cases, giving precedence to id if both are given. Care to open a RFE requesting so?
Am 08.05.2014 11:34, schrieb Juan Hernandez:
When adding a disk to a VM both a single domain storage and a list of storage domains are accepted. The JSON representation is the following:
"storage_domain": { "id": "6fbee79d-5b71-48c1-b86c-ee9755a46013" }
Note that "name" isn't accepted here, you have to use the "id".
The JSON representation for multiple domains is the following (note that only the first one is used):
"storage_domains": { "storage_domain": [ { "name": "am_data" } ] }
Note that "id" isn't accepted here, you have to use "name".
-- Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta 3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 - Red Hat S.L.