On 05/08/2014 12:59 PM, Sven Kieske wrote:
May I ask if there is any reason why this is so inconsistent?
(id vs name)
I guess it is for historical reasons. We should probably accept both id
and name in both cases, giving precedence to id if both are given. Care
to open a RFE requesting so?
Am 08.05.2014 11:34, schrieb Juan Hernandez:
> When adding a disk to a VM both a single domain storage and a list of
> storage domains are accepted. The JSON representation is the following:
>
> "storage_domain": {
> "id": "6fbee79d-5b71-48c1-b86c-ee9755a46013"
> }
>
> Note that "name" isn't accepted here, you have to use the
"id".
>
> The JSON representation for multiple domains is the following (note that
> only the first one is used):
>
> "storage_domains": {
> "storage_domain": [ {
> "name": "am_data"
> } ]
> }
>
> Note that "id" isn't accepted here, you have to use "name".
--
Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta
3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain
Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 - Red Hat S.L.