Re: [Users] [ANN] oVirt 3.4.0 Second Release Candidate is now available
----- Original Message -----
From: "Giorgio Bersano" <giorgio.bersano(a)gmail.com>
To: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "users(a)ovirt.org" <Users(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 4:14:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] [ANN] oVirt 3.4.0 Second Release Candidate is now available
2014-03-12 14:53 GMT+01:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>:
> Il 12/03/2014 14:45, Giorgio Bersano ha scritto:
>> 2014-03-11 23:43 GMT+01:00 Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>:
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
>>>> To: announce(a)ovirt.org, Users(a)ovirt.org, "engine-devel"
>>>> <engine-devel(a)ovirt.org>, "arch" <arch(a)ovirt.org>,
"VDSM
>>>> Project Development" <vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 6:17:03 PM
>>>> Subject: [Users] [ANN] oVirt 3.4.0 Second Release Candidate is now
>>>> available
>>>>
>>>> The oVirt team is pleased to announce that the 3.4.0 Second Release
>>>> Candidate
>>>> is now available for testing.
>>> ...
>>>> [1] http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.4.0_release_notes
>>>
>>> I noticed that not all vdsm fixes are listed in the release notes
>>>
>>> 74b4a27 xmlrpc: [Fix] Use correct base class for parsing request
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1074063
>>>
>>> d456d75 xmlrpc: Support HTTP 1.1
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1070476
>>>
>>> Nir
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> just want to let you know that upgrading the engine from 3.4.0 RC ->
>> 3.4.0 RC2 pulls in three i686 rpms:
>> glibc-2.12-1.132.el6.i686.rpm
>> iptables-1.4.7-11.el6.i686.rpm
>> nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-9.el6.i686.rpm
>> ( this is a fully patched CentOS 6.5 x86_64 install).
>
>
> Sounds really weird. Anybody else hit this? Can you determine which package
> pulled in that dep?
>
It surely is iptables that got the two other rpm in.
I think it was requested in some way because during the
# engine-setup
phase I answered Yes to the firewall question
Do you want Setup to configure the firewall? (Yes, No) [Yes]:
I admit it sounds reasonable, but I do not think it's related.
In the very same situation in the past I had no 32 bit packages installed.
I think there are no useful messages in the setup log (extract follows):
Can you please post somewhere full logs?
Thanks.
--
Didi