On 01/31/2013 10:25 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:43:44AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 01/30/2013 08:40 PM, Dead Horse wrote:
The nodes are EL6.3 based.
Currently installed libvirt packages:
libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.9.10-21.el6_3.8.x86_64 libvirt-cim-0.6.1-3.el6.x86_64 libvirt-0.9.10-21.el6_3.8.x86_64 libvirt-python-0.9.10-21.el6_3.8.x86_64 libvirt-client-0.9.10-21.el6_3.8.x86_64
and qemu packages: qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.295.el6_3.10.x86_64 qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.295.el6_3.10.x86_64 qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.295.el6_3.10.x86_64
Thus my presumption here given the above is that virDomainMigrateToURI2 has not yet been patched and/or back-ported into the EL6.x libvirt/qemu?
virDomainMigrateToURI2 is supported since 0.9.2, but is there a possibility the code is requesting direct migration? That might explain the message, which is then incorrect; this was fixed in [1].
Martin
[1] http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commitdiff;h=3189dfb1636da22d426d2fc...
What is "direct migration" exactly, in the context of qemu-kvm?
We are using p2p migration http://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=vdsm.git;a=blob;f=vdsm/libvirtvm.py;h=fe140...
OK, so that's not the issue, sorry for the confusion. I was thinking it would "somehow" get there. Direct migration doesn't exist in QEMU at all, so it seemed weird, but I can't seem to find any other reason for this failure; will keep searching, though. Martin