Re: [Users] Will migration succeed between two different CPU?

On Tue 02 Jul 2013 03:29:47 PM IDT, lofyer wrote: > On 2013/7/2 20:15, Roy Golan wrote: >> On Tue 02 Jul 2013 03:09:08 PM IDT, lofyer wrote: >>> On 2013/7/2 19:58, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:17 PM, lofyer wrote: >>>>> On 2013/7/2 19:06, Roy Golan wrote: >>>>>> On Tue 02 Jul 2013 12:48:44 PM IDT, lofyer wrote: >>>>>>> On 2013/7/2 17:07, Roy Golan wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue 02 Jul 2013 12:00:12 PM IDT, lofyer wrote: >>>>>>>>> Will migration succeed between two different CPU? >>>>>>>>> Suppose node A is Core-i5, node B is Xeon e5405. >>>>> Unfortunately no, I'll paste log file later. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I think you have to choose the "lowest" level of cpu type of your >>>> hosts for your cluster cpu type... >>>> What is now thsi cpu type? >>>> Gianluca >>> "Lowest" cpu level? Is there a list of cpu priority? >>> For now the cluster cpu type is Nehalem, there is an Core-i5 node and >>> Xeon node in it. >> >> This is already enforced by the cluster so if there was a problem >> cpu-wise you would see it. >> Nehalem is lower then the SandyBridge (this is sorted out in the >> drop-down) >> >> bottom line we need the log. >> > OK, I see. I would paste the log file in a few hours(the Core-i5 nodes > has been shutdown by my friend..) > So, the priority is AMD G5 > G4 > ... > Intel Haswell > .. Conroe > family ? > Unless G5 node migrate VM initiatively, it would be impossible to > migrate VM from G5 node to others? The cluster name (the family) sets all VM's CPUs to be virtualized as Nehalem. The Corei5 extra instruction-set are not being used and that's how we ensure a migration between hosts.