----- Original Message -----
> On 01/23/2014 08:34 PM, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote:
>> Hi Itamar,
>>
>> I don't know if I get your post right, but to me, it seems that if so
>> many users hit the same rock, it should mean that this should be
>> documented somewhere visible and in my opinion, push on getting bug
>> 1049476 <
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049476> solved asap.
>> Regards,
>
> 1. yes, too many issues on this one, hinting we should provide better
> text explaining this in the UI.
>
> 2. the bug you referenced[1]
> Bug 1049476 - [RFE] Mix untagged and tagged Logical Networks on the same NIC
>
> is actually supported, as long as the untagged logical network is not a
> VM network (so VMs associated with it would not be able to see/create
> other logical networks traffic).
>
> 3. considering how prevalent this is, maybe we should allow doing this,
> even for VM networks, with a big red warning, rather than block it,
> which seems to be failing everyone.
Besides that it's technically not possible in the way we currently use the Linux
Bridge [1],
I'm not sure what's to gain from representing a single "flat" network
with multiple representations.
Seems to me like there may be a couple different points here:
* ovirtmgmt is VM network by default - should be configurable on setup and/or DC
creation.
If it's such a prevalent issue, we should consider a default of non VM network
(users can create a flat network and use it quite easily anyway, if they want).
From a UX point of view I don't think this would be desireable. I
think
it's convenient for a new user to be able to use just the one default
network for everything (including connection to VMs).
* if people want to represent different L3 networks on the same L2
network, it is worthwhile to design a proper solution
Either way, I wouldn't push for allowing multiple bridged networks on the same
physical interface (or bond).
[1] and also not allowed in OpenStack Neutron IIUC.
>
> cc-ing some more folks for their thoughts.
>
>
> [1] in the future, please use number-name formatso not everyone would
> have to open it to understand
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users