Re: [Users] libvirt dependency vs. a way to have Solaris hosts in ovirt-engine
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:51:56AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:02:05AM +0100, Jiri Belka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as you know Solaris (Open Indiana) has qemu-kvm although they don't use
> libvirt (in fact libvirt tighted to much to Linux specifics).
I'm kind of surprised to hear you say that. One of libvirt's goals is
portability, so if it doesn't work on Solaris now, you should mention
it on libvir-list, and I wouldn't expect getting it to work would be
that troublesome. Personally I don't use Solaris, but if it's
something you want, you should ask and see what other people's
experience is.
Dave
> If vdsm whould interact with qemu-kvm without libvirt it would
open a
> way to have Solaris hosts in ovirt-engine.
>
> libvirt is another abstraction after vdsm layer, or if vdsm could use
> "plugins" to interact with qemu-kvm (libvirt, "native",
solaris-style),
> it could use current mode, bypass libvirt and use solaris tools to talk
> to their qemu-kvm.
In the old days, vdsm used to work with qemu processes directly.
We moved to be using libvirt's abstraction in order to gain then-new qmp
code "for free", and to make it easier for 3rd party applications poll
oVirt VMs over the libvirt api. We also use the libvirt dom xml as an
API for vdsm extension hooks.
Beyond that, there are a few Linuxisms in Vdsm itself. I would first
want to see it ported to non-Fedora-flavor Linuxes (did someone say
Ubuntu?), and only later to Solaris.
Dan.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users