--_db293c12-8a38-4a40-a418-2777b79f5e1e_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I just noticed something different about=20 http://www.ovirt.org/releases/3.0/rpm/Fedora/16/ vs=20 http://www.ovirt.org/releases/3.1/rpm/Fedora/17/ and certain packages. Previously in 3.0=2C packages like ovirt-engine* only ran on 64-bit=20 systems (x86_64)=2C while other packages were noarch. Now it seems most of the packages are noarch. Was this intentional? It's a nice surprise=20 anyway if it is. - Nick = --_db293c12-8a38-4a40-a418-2777b79f5e1e_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html> <head> <style><!-- .hmmessage P { margin:0px=3B padding:0px } body.hmmessage { font-size: 10pt=3B font-family:Tahoma } --></style></head> <body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'> I just noticed something different about=20 http://www.ovirt.org/releases/3.0/rpm/Fedora/16/ vs=20 http://www.ovirt.org/releases/3.1/rpm/Fedora/17/ and certain packages.<br> <br> Previously in 3.0=2C packages like ovirt-engine* only ran on 64-bit=20 systems (x86_64)=2C while other packages were noarch. Now it seems most of the packages are noarch. Was this intentional? It's a nice surprise=20 anyway if it is.<br> <br> - Nick </div></body> </html>= --_db293c12-8a38-4a40-a418-2777b79f5e1e_--