Re: [ovirt-users] What is the libcacard-ev.x86_64 ??

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Arman Khalatyan <arm2arm(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Hello, I reconnect to this thread, as I have similar problem/doubt relatd to libcacard / libcacard-ev packages. I had a cluster composed by two nodes, plain CentOS 7.3 nodes. They were installed in 4.0.6 (on 21/01) and this involved installation of libcacard-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64 package. Then I updated to 4.1 (on 08/02) using "yum update" strategy and nothing changed about this package. Yesteray I added a third node, but I notice that on it I don't have libcacard-ev but libcacard-2.5.2-2.el7.x86_64 Source for the -ev package is qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.src.rpm and build host el7-vm28.phx.ovirt.org and this makes me think it is the right package. But it is not pulled in into the new host where I think I have the standard CentOS one with source RPM libcacard-2.5.2-2.el7.src.rpm and Packager CentOS BuildSystem The strange thing is that in their changelog I have: - for standard libcacard: * Fri Mar 18 2016 Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin(a)redhat.com&gt; - 2.5.2-2.el7 - Obsolete libcacard-rhev (bz#1315953) * Fri Jan 29 2016 Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin(a)redhat.com&gt; - 2.5.2-1.el7 - Initial build - for libcacard-ev * Fri Jul 08 2016 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com&gt; - ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Thu Jun 16 2016 Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin(a)redhat.com&gt; - rhev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16 - kvm-vga-add-sr_vbe-register-set.patch [bz#1347185] - Resolves: bz#1347185 (Regression from CVE-2016-3712: windows installer fails to start) ... What to choose and to do? Thanks, Gianluca