[ovirt-users] Re: Xcp-ng, first impressions as an oVirt HCI alternative

The impression I've got from this mailing list is they are intentional design decisions to enforce "correctness" of the cluster.

My understanding of cluster (ever since the VAX) is that it's a fault-tolerance mechanism and that was originally one of the major selling points of these hypervisor orchestration suites like vSphere, RHV etc. Since that doesn't quite work with local storage, I understand why they left it out for live migration. AFAIK it works just fine for VMs that are down or disks that are not attached.