------=_Part_229011_1301094445.1362667608422
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
hi, Dan Kenigsberg
yes, i am working on this feature, the goal is that HOST can supply bridge and NAT network
meanwhile ,users can choise.
because birdge network occupy too many IPs, at least, one user will have 2 IPs(VM and thin
client).
At 2013-03-07 19:28:29,"Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 06:49:20PM +0800, bigclouds wrote:
> why ovirt does not support NAT network?
Would you elaborate on that?
Do you refer to putthing VMs behind a NAT, instead of a bridge?
------=_Part_229011_1301094445.1362667608422
Content-Type: text/html; charset=GBK
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<div
style="line-height:1.7;color:#000000;font-size:14px;font-family:arial">hi, <span
style="white-space: pre-wrap; line-height:
1.7;">Dan Kenigsberg</span><div><span
style="white-space: pre-wrap;">yes, i am working on this feature, the goal is
that HOST can supply bridge and NAT network meanwhile ,users can
choise.</span></div><div><span style="white-space:
pre-wrap;">because birdge network occupy too many IPs, at least, one user
will have 2 IPs(VM and thin
client).</span></div><div><br><br><br><br><div></div><div
id="divNeteaseMailCard"></div><br><pre><br>At 2013-03-07 19:28:29,"Dan Kenigsberg" <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 06:49:20PM +0800, bigclouds wrote:
>> why ovirt does not support NAT network?
>
>Would you elaborate on that?
>
>Do you refer to putthing VMs behind a NAT, instead of a bridge?
</pre></div></div><br><br><span
title="neteasefooter"><span
id="netease_mail_footer"></span></span>
------=_Part_229011_1301094445.1362667608422--