------=_Part_229011_1301094445.1362667608422 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit hi, Dan Kenigsberg yes, i am working on this feature, the goal is that HOST can supply bridge and NAT network meanwhile ,users can choise. because birdge network occupy too many IPs, at least, one user will have 2 IPs(VM and thin client). At 2013-03-07 19:28:29,"Dan Kenigsberg" <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 06:49:20PM +0800, bigclouds wrote:
why ovirt does not support NAT network?
Would you elaborate on that?
Do you refer to putthing VMs behind a NAT, instead of a bridge?
------=_Part_229011_1301094445.1362667608422 Content-Type: text/html; charset=GBK Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <div style="line-height:1.7;color:#000000;font-size:14px;font-family:arial">hi, <span style="white-space: pre-wrap; line-height: 1.7;">Dan Kenigsberg</span><div><span style="white-space: pre-wrap;">yes, i am working on this feature, the goal is that HOST can supply bridge and NAT network meanwhile ,users can choise.</span></div><div><span style="white-space: pre-wrap;">because birdge network occupy too many IPs, at least, one user will have 2 IPs(VM and thin client).</span></div><div><br><br><br><br><div></div><div id="divNeteaseMailCard"></div><br><pre><br>At 2013-03-07 19:28:29,"Dan Kenigsberg" <danken@redhat.com> wrote: >On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 06:49:20PM +0800, bigclouds wrote: >> why ovirt does not support NAT network? > >Would you elaborate on that? > >Do you refer to putthing VMs behind a NAT, instead of a bridge? </pre></div></div><br><br><span title="neteasefooter"><span id="netease_mail_footer"></span></span> ------=_Part_229011_1301094445.1362667608422--