12:54 p.m.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------27CA2B1123847DBF1F81EC89
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear oVirt Users,
we installed a third ovirt node using the ovirt node ng image (4.2.2),
and added that node using the web interface of the hosted engine:
Compute->Hosts->New - including the Hosted engine option "Choose hosted
engine deployment action" set to "Deploy"
After that we found out, that on the new node the host_id entry was
causing problems. In
/etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf
we found the entry
...
host_id=3D2
...
But that host id already exists and was alive during deployment process.
So my questions are:
* How is the host id chosen (when adding a new host via GUI)?
* Is there an option to preselect the host id in the GUI for a new node=
?
* How can we prevent further duplicate host ids?
Thanks and best regards,
Thomas
--=20
________________________________________________________________________
Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer / CEO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120
Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schr=C3=B6er
________________________________________________________________________
--------------27CA2B1123847DBF1F81EC89
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html <head
<meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html;
charset=3Dutf=
-8" </head <body text=3D"#000000"
bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF" <p>Dear oVirt
Users,</p <p>we installed a third
ovirt node using the ovirt node ng image
(4.2.2), and added that node using the web interface of the hosted
engine:<br <br Compute->Hosts->New - including the Hosted
engine option
"Choose hosted engine deployment action" set to
"Deploy"<br </p <p>After that we found out, that on the new node the
host_id entry
was causing problems. In <br
</p
<p>/etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf<br
</p <p>we found the entry<br </p
<p>...<br host_id=3D2<br ...<br
<br But that host id already exists and was alive during
deployment
process.<br So my questions are:</p <ul
<li>How is the host id chosen (when adding a new host via GUI)?</li=
<li>Is there an option to preselect the host id in
the GUI for a
new node?</li <li>How can we prevent
further duplicate host ids?<br </li </ul
<p>Thanks and best regards,<br
Thomas<br </p <br
<pre class=3D"moz-signature" cols=3D"72" --=20
________________________________________________________________________
Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute <a class=3D"moz-txt=
-link-abbreviated"
href=3D"mailto:klute@ingenit.com">klute@ingenit.com</a=
Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer / CEO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-1=
20
Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
D-44227 Dortmund <a class=3D"moz-t=
xt-link-abbreviated"
href=3D"http://www.ingenit.com">www.ingenit.com</a
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schr=C3=B6er
________________________________________________________________________
</pre </body </html
--------------27CA2B1123847DBF1F81EC89--
1:04 p.m.
Hello,
the ID should be coming from the SPM ID of the host as assigned by the
engine and duplicates should not be happening indeed.
Can you please tell us what version of engine you have and how was
first hosted engine node deployed? We recently changed the default
deployment method (4.2.2 in fact) and we would like to know whether
this might be related to that change or not.
Simone, do you know how to debug this? Are there logs we could use to
check the behavior? The host-deploy logs maybe?
Best regards
--
Martin Sivak
SLA / oVirt
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Thomas Klute <klute(a)ingenit.com> wrote:
Dear oVirt Users,
we installed a third ovirt node using the ovirt node ng image (4.2.2), and
added that node using the web interface of the hosted engine:
Compute->Hosts->New - including the Hosted engine option "Choose hosted
engine deployment action" set to "Deploy"
After that we found out, that on the new node the host_id entry was causing
problems. In
/etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf
we found the entry
...
host_id=2
...
But that host id already exists and was alive during deployment process.
So my questions are:
How is the host id chosen (when adding a new host via GUI)?
Is there an option to preselect the host id in the GUI for a new node?
How can we prevent further duplicate host ids?
Thanks and best regards,
Thomas
--
________________________________________________________________________
Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
Geschäftsführer / CEO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120
Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer
________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
2:08 p.m.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Martin Sivak <msivak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hello,
the ID should be coming from the SPM ID of the host as assigned by the
engine and duplicates should not be happening indeed.
Can you please tell us what version of engine you have and how was
first hosted engine node deployed? We recently changed the default
deployment method (4.2.2 in fact) and we would like to know whether
this might be related to that change or not.
Simone, do you know how to debug this? Are there logs we could use to
check the behavior? The host-deploy logs maybe?
Thomas,
can you please share the output of
sudo -u postgres scl enable rh-postgresql95 -- psql -d engine -c "select
vds_id, vds_name, vds_spm_id from vds"
executed on the engine VM
and the content of /var/log/ovirt-engine/host-deploy (still from the engine
VM)?
Best regards
--
Martin Sivak
SLA / oVirt
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Thomas Klute <klute(a)ingenit.com> wrote:
> Dear oVirt Users,
>
> we installed a third ovirt node using the ovirt node ng image (4.2.2),
and
> added that node using the web interface of the hosted engine:
>
> Compute->Hosts->New - including the Hosted engine option "Choose hosted
> engine deployment action" set to "Deploy"
>
> After that we found out, that on the new node the host_id entry was
causing
> problems. In
>
> /etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf
>
> we found the entry
>
> ...
> host_id=2
> ...
>
> But that host id already exists and was alive during deployment process.
> So my questions are:
>
> How is the host id chosen (when adding a new host via GUI)?
> Is there an option to preselect the host id in the GUI for a new node?
> How can we prevent further duplicate host ids?
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Thomas
>
>
> --
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
> Geschäftsführer / CEO
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120
> Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
> D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
> Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
2:26 p.m.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------E286642B64280AE88EDC5994
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Simone,
thanks for the help, I already have noticed, that there is a mismatch
between SPM IDs and the hosts.
>=C2=A0 Dipl.-Inform. Thomas
Klute=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0
>
_______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org >
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
<http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Sollten noch Fragen offen sein, stehen wir Ihnen nat=C3=BCrlich jederzeit
gerne zur Verf=C3=BCgung.
Mit Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fen aus Dortmund,
Thomas Klute
--=20
________________________________________________________________________
Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer / CEO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120
Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schr=C3=B6er
________________________________________________________________________
--------------E286642B64280AE88EDC5994
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html <head <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type"
content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf=
-8" </head <body text=3D"#000000"
bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF" <div
class=3D"moz-cite-prefix">Dear Simone,<br
<br thanks for the help, I already have noticed, that there
is a
mismatch between SPM IDs and the hosts.<br
From my knowledge this may be our fault.<br
<br =C2=A0vds_name | vds_spm_id<br =C2=A0oVirt4=C2=A0=C2=A0
|=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0 3<br =C2=A0oVirt2=C2=A0=C2=A0
|=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0 4<br =C2=A0oVirt6=C2=A0=C2=A0
|=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0 6<br =C2=A0oVirt5=C2=A0=C2=A0
|=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0 5<br =C2=A0oVirt1=C2=A0=C2=A0
|=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0 1<br =C2=A0oVirt3=C2=A0=C2=A0
|=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0=C2=A0 2<br <br oVirt3 was re-installed using the node ng image - and was
assigned
id 2 that was available at that time (taken into account this
database query).<br It was not available in fact
because of the host ovirt2 having the
host_id=3D2 entry in the configuration on the host and the sanlock
having locked the appropriate space.<br
<br I can't remember where this mismatch came from but I
assume that
some time ago someone maybe manually changed the entry on oVirt2
host in order to match with the hostname (oVirtX -> Host id X).<=
br Thus I think it is not a bug at the moment.<br <br But
that leads me to the next question:<br
<br Is there a manual way to align numbers in the hostnames
with the
SPM IDs? (oVirt4 should be spm id 4)<br
<br Does this work? Update the database, change the entry in
hosted-engine.conf and then reboot the node?<br
<br Thanks & best regards,<br Thomas<br
<br <br
</div <blockquote
type=3D"cite"
cite=3D"mid:CAN8-ONoCNj8gth+sxHdgXnYOEizwtcUXLocaBddo+Z+jJdHUKA@mail.gmai=
l.com" <div
dir=3D"ltr"><br <div
class=3D"gmail_extra"><br
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 1:04 PM,
Martin Sivak <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a
href=3D"mailto:msivak@redhat.com" target=3D"_blank"
moz-do-not-send=3D"true">msivak(a)redhat.com</a>&gt;</span wrote:<br
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hello,<br <br
the ID should be coming from the SPM ID of the host as
assigned by the<br
engine and duplicates should not be happening indeed.<br <br
Can you please tell us what version of engine you have and
how was<br first hosted engine
node deployed? We recently changed the
default<br deployment method
(4.2.2 in fact) and we would like to
know whether<br this might be related
to that change or not.<br <br Simone, do you know how to debug this? Are there
logs we
could use to<br check the behavior?
The host-deploy logs maybe?<br </blockquote <div><br
</div
<div>Thomas,</div <div>can you
please share the output of=C2=A0</div
<div>=C2=A0 sudo -u postgres scl enable rh-postgresql95 -- ps=
ql
-d engine -c "select vds_id, vds_name, vds_spm_id from
vds"<br </div <div>executed on the engine VM</div <div><br
</div <div>and the
content of=C2=A0/var/log/ovirt-engine/host-deplo=
y
(still from the engine VM)?</div
<div>=C2=A0</div <blockquote
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"
<br Best regards<br <br
--<br Martin Sivak<br SLA / oVirt<br
<div <div
class=3D"gmail-h5"><br
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Thomas Klute <<a
href=3D"mailto:klute@ingenit.com"
moz-do-not-send=3D"true">klute(a)ingenit.com</a>&gt;
wrote:<br > Dear
oVirt Users,<br ><br > we installed a third ovirt node
using the ovirt
node ng image (4.2.2), and<br
> added that node using the web interface of the
hosted engine:<br
><br >
Compute->Hosts->New - including the Hosted
engine option "Choose hosted<br
> engine deployment action" set to "Deploy"<br ><br
> After that we found out, that on the new node the
host_id entry was causing<br
> problems. In<br
><br >
/etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/<wbr>hosted-engine.conf<b=
r ><br
> we found the entry<br
><br >
...<br >
host_id=3D2<br >
...<br ><br > But that host id already exists and
was alive
during deployment process.<br
> So my questions are:<br
><br > How is
the host id chosen (when adding a new host
via GUI)?<br > Is there
an option to preselect the host id in
the GUI for a new node?<br
> How can we prevent further duplicate host ids?<br ><br
> Thanks and best regards,<br
> Thomas<br ><br ><br
> --<br >
______________________________<wbr>_______________=
_______________<wbr>____________<br
><br >=C2=A0
Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"mailto:klute@ingenit.com=
"
moz-do-not-send=3D"true">klute(a)ingenit.com</a><br >=C2=A0 Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer /
CEO<br >=C2=A0
------------------------------<wbr>---------=
---------------------<wbr>----------<br
>=C2=A0 ingenit GmbH & Co. KG=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0
=C2=A0Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120<br
>=C2=A0 Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Fax.
+49 (0)231 58 698-121<br
>=C2=A0 D-44227 Dortmund=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"http://www.ingeni=
t.com"
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank"
moz-do-not-send=3D"true">www.ingenit.com</a><br ><br
>=C2=A0 Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 1=
3
914<br >=C2=A0
Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christia=
n
Schr=C3=B6er<br
> ______________________________<wbr>_______________=
_______________<wbr>____________<br
><br ><br </div
</div >
______________________________<wbr>_________________<b=
r > Users mailing list<br > <a
href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org"
moz-do-not-send=3D"true">Users(a)ovirt.org</a><br > <a
href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users"
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank"
moz-do-not-send=3D"t=
rue">http://lists.ovirt.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/users<... ><br
</blockquote </div <br
</div </div </blockquote
<p><br </p <pre class=3D"moz-signature"
cols=3D"72">Sollten noch Fragen offen se=
in, stehen wir Ihnen nat=C3=BCrlich jederzeit
gerne zur Verf=C3=BCgung.
Mit Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fen aus Dortmund,
Thomas Klute
--=20
________________________________________________________________________
Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute <a class=3D"moz-txt=
-link-abbreviated"
href=3D"mailto:klute@ingenit.com">klute@ingenit.com</a=
Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer / CEO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-1=
20
Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
D-44227 Dortmund <a class=3D"moz-t=
xt-link-abbreviated"
href=3D"http://www.ingenit.com">www.ingenit.com</a
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schr=C3=B6er
________________________________________________________________________
</pre </body </html
--------------E286642B64280AE88EDC5994--
From my knowledge this may be our fault.
=C2=A0vds_name | vds_spm_id
=C2=A0oVirt4=C2=A0=C2=A0 |=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0 3
=C2=A0oVirt2=C2=A0=C2=A0 |=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0 4
=C2=A0oVirt6=C2=A0=C2=A0 |=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0 6
=C2=A0oVirt5=C2=A0=C2=A0 |=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0 5
=C2=A0oVirt1=C2=A0=C2=A0 |=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0 1
=C2=A0oVirt3=C2=A0=C2=A0 |=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=
=C2=A0 2
oVirt3 was re-installed using the node ng image - and was assigned id 2
that was available at that time (taken into account this database query).
It was not available in fact because of the host ovirt2 having the
host_id=3D2 entry in the configuration on the host and the sanlock having
locked the appropriate space.
I can't remember where this mismatch came from but I assume that some
time ago someone maybe manually changed the entry on oVirt2 host in
order to match with the hostname (oVirtX -> Host id X).
Thus I think it is not a bug at the moment.
But that leads me to the next question:
Is there a manual way to align numbers in the hostnames with the SPM
IDs? (oVirt4 should be spm id 4)
Does this work? Update the database, change the entry in
hosted-engine.conf and then reboot the node?
Thanks & best regards,
Thomas
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Martin Sivak <msivak(a)redhat.com
<mailto:msivak@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hello,
the ID should be coming from the SPM ID of the host as assigned by =
the
engine and duplicates should not be happening indeed.
Can you please tell us what version of engine you have and how was
first hosted engine node deployed? We recently changed the default
deployment method (4.2.2 in fact) and we would like to know whether
this might be related to that change or not.
Simone, do you know how to debug this? Are there logs we could use =
to
check the behavior? The host-deploy logs maybe?
Thomas,
can you please share the output of=C2=A0
=C2=A0 sudo -u postgres scl enable rh-postgresql95 -- psql -d engine -c
"select vds_id, vds_name, vds_spm_id from vds"
executed on the engine VM
and the content of=C2=A0/var/log/ovirt-engine/host-deploy (still from t=
he
engine VM)?
=C2=A0
Best regards
--
Martin Sivak
SLA / oVirt
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Thomas Klute <klute(a)ingenit.com
<mailto:klute@ingenit.com>> wrote:
> Dear oVirt Users,
> we installed a third ovirt node using the ovirt node
ng image
(4.2.2), and
> added that node using the web interface of the hosted engine:
> Compute->Hosts->New - including the Hosted
engine option "Choose
hosted
> engine deployment action" set to "Deploy"
> After that we found out, that on the new node the
host_id entry
was causing
> problems. In
> /etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf
> we found the entry
> ...
> host_id=3D2
> ...
> But that host id already exists and was alive during
deployment
process.
> So my questions are:
> How is the host id chosen (when adding a new host via
GUI)?
> Is there an option to preselect the host id in the GUI for a new
node?
> How can we prevent further duplicate host ids?
> Thanks and best regards,
> Thomas
> --
___________________________________________________________________=
_____
=C2=A0klute(a)ingenit.com <mailto:klute@ingenit.com >=C2=A0 Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer / CEO
>=C2=A0
-------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
>=C2=A0 ingenit GmbH & Co. KG=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Tel. +49 (0)231 58
698-120
>=C2=A0 Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Fax. +49 (0)231 58
698-121
>=C2=A0 D-44227 Dortmund=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0
=C2=A0www.ingenit.com <http://www.ingenit.com >=C2=A0 Registergericht:
Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
>=C2=A0 Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schr=C3=B6er
___________________________________________________________________=
_____
2:38 p.m.
Hi Thomas,
is there a real need to have them aligned? Both SPM ID and Hosted
engine ids are quite hidden and accompanied by hostname where visible.
I understand the urge to have everything neatly organized, but playing
with hosted engine IDs and SPM IDs will bring you nothing but trouble.
Theoretically you could put all hosts to maintenance, hosted engine to
global maintenance, stop the engine service and update the DB and
hosted engine config files. Changing anything when active is a big
NO-NO. And I can't promise stability even if you stop everything
first.
The short version: Please change hosted engine ID to match SPM ID
(/etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf) and ignore the hostname
vs ID mismatch. All other options might cost you..
Best regards
--
Martin Sivak
SLA / oVirt
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Klute <klute(a)ingenit.com> wrote:
Dear Simone,
thanks for the help, I already have noticed, that there is a mismatch
between SPM IDs and the hosts.
From my knowledge this may be our fault.
vds_name | vds_spm_id
oVirt4 | 3
oVirt2 | 4
oVirt6 | 6
oVirt5 | 5
oVirt1 | 1
oVirt3 | 2
oVirt3 was re-installed using the node ng image - and was assigned id 2 that
was available at that time (taken into account this database query).
It was not available in fact because of the host ovirt2 having the host_id=2
entry in the configuration on the host and the sanlock having locked the
appropriate space.
I can't remember where this mismatch came from but I assume that some time
ago someone maybe manually changed the entry on oVirt2 host in order to
match with the hostname (oVirtX -> Host id X).
Thus I think it is not a bug at the moment.
But that leads me to the next question:
Is there a manual way to align numbers in the hostnames with the SPM IDs?
(oVirt4 should be spm id 4)
Does this work? Update the database, change the entry in hosted-engine.conf
and then reboot the node?
Thanks & best regards,
Thomas
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Martin Sivak <msivak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> the ID should be coming from the SPM ID of the host as assigned by the
> engine and duplicates should not be happening indeed.
>
> Can you please tell us what version of engine you have and how was
> first hosted engine node deployed? We recently changed the default
> deployment method (4.2.2 in fact) and we would like to know whether
> this might be related to that change or not.
>
> Simone, do you know how to debug this? Are there logs we could use to
> check the behavior? The host-deploy logs maybe?
Thomas,
can you please share the output of
sudo -u postgres scl enable rh-postgresql95 -- psql -d engine -c "select
vds_id, vds_name, vds_spm_id from vds"
executed on the engine VM
and the content of /var/log/ovirt-engine/host-deploy (still from the engine
VM)?
>
>
> Best regards
>
> --
> Martin Sivak
> SLA / oVirt
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Thomas Klute <klute(a)ingenit.com> wrote:
> > Dear oVirt Users,
> >
> > we installed a third ovirt node using the ovirt node ng image (4.2.2),
> > and
> > added that node using the web interface of the hosted engine:
> >
> > Compute->Hosts->New - including the Hosted engine option "Choose
hosted
> > engine deployment action" set to "Deploy"
> >
> > After that we found out, that on the new node the host_id entry was
> > causing
> > problems. In
> >
> > /etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf
> >
> > we found the entry
> >
> > ...
> > host_id=2
> > ...
> >
> > But that host id already exists and was alive during deployment process.
> > So my questions are:
> >
> > How is the host id chosen (when adding a new host via GUI)?
> > Is there an option to preselect the host id in the GUI for a new node?
> > How can we prevent further duplicate host ids?
> >
> > Thanks and best regards,
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> > --
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
> > Geschäftsführer / CEO
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120
> > Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
> > D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
> >
> > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
> > Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users(a)ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
Sollten noch Fragen offen sein, stehen wir Ihnen natürlich jederzeit
gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit Grüßen aus Dortmund,
Thomas Klute
--
________________________________________________________________________
Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
Geschäftsführer / CEO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120
Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer
________________________________________________________________________
2:47 p.m.
Hi Martin,
I fully understand.
The only reason is that it's not only me administering this oVirt setup,
it's a setup for a client that has 2 local administrators.
We are trying to eliminate any configuration that might cause confusion.
When doing a
hosted-engine --vm-status
a list like this is shown:
--== Host 1 status ==--
...
Hostname : ovirt1.munk.de
Host ID : 1
...
--== Host 2 status ==--
...
Hostname : ovirt3.munk.de
Host ID : 2
...
and so on.
This "Host 2" -> ovirt3 will sooner or later cause confusion and will
lead to administrative actions applied to the wrong hosts.
I'll give it a try and try to align the hosts and ids. I'll backup the
old values in order to be able to roll back the changes if it does not work.
Thanks for your help!!
Best regards,
Thomas
Hi Thomas,
is there a real need to have them aligned? Both SPM ID and Hosted
engine ids are quite hidden and accompanied by hostname where visible.
I understand the urge to have everything neatly organized, but playing
with hosted engine IDs and SPM IDs will bring you nothing but trouble.
Theoretically you could put all hosts to maintenance, hosted engine to
global maintenance, stop the engine service and update the DB and
hosted engine config files. Changing anything when active is a big
NO-NO. And I can't promise stability even if you stop everything
first.
The short version: Please change hosted engine ID to match SPM ID
(/etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf) and ignore the hostname
vs ID mismatch. All other options might cost you..
Best regards
--
Martin Sivak
SLA / oVirt
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Klute <klute(a)ingenit.com> wrote:
> Dear Simone,
>
> thanks for the help, I already have noticed, that there is a mismatch
> between SPM IDs and the hosts.
> From my knowledge this may be our fault.
>
> vds_name | vds_spm_id
> oVirt4 | 3
> oVirt2 | 4
> oVirt6 | 6
> oVirt5 | 5
> oVirt1 | 1
> oVirt3 | 2
>
> oVirt3 was re-installed using the node ng image - and was assigned id 2 that
> was available at that time (taken into account this database query).
> It was not available in fact because of the host ovirt2 having the host_id=2
> entry in the configuration on the host and the sanlock having locked the
> appropriate space.
>
> I can't remember where this mismatch came from but I assume that some time
> ago someone maybe manually changed the entry on oVirt2 host in order to
> match with the hostname (oVirtX -> Host id X).
> Thus I think it is not a bug at the moment.
>
> But that leads me to the next question:
>
> Is there a manual way to align numbers in the hostnames with the SPM IDs?
> (oVirt4 should be spm id 4)
>
> Does this work? Update the database, change the entry in hosted-engine.conf
> and then reboot the node?
>
> Thanks & best regards,
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Martin Sivak <msivak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> the ID should be coming from the SPM ID of the host as assigned by the
>> engine and duplicates should not be happening indeed.
>>
>> Can you please tell us what version of engine you have and how was
>> first hosted engine node deployed? We recently changed the default
>> deployment method (4.2.2 in fact) and we would like to know whether
>> this might be related to that change or not.
>>
>> Simone, do you know how to debug this? Are there logs we could use to
>> check the behavior? The host-deploy logs maybe?
>
> Thomas,
> can you please share the output of
> sudo -u postgres scl enable rh-postgresql95 -- psql -d engine -c "select
> vds_id, vds_name, vds_spm_id from vds"
> executed on the engine VM
>
> and the content of /var/log/ovirt-engine/host-deploy (still from the engine
> VM)?
>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> --
>> Martin Sivak
>> SLA / oVirt
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Thomas Klute <klute(a)ingenit.com> wrote:
>>> Dear oVirt Users,
>>>
>>> we installed a third ovirt node using the ovirt node ng image (4.2.2),
>>> and
>>> added that node using the web interface of the hosted engine:
>>>
>>> Compute->Hosts->New - including the Hosted engine option "Choose
hosted
>>> engine deployment action" set to "Deploy"
>>>
>>> After that we found out, that on the new node the host_id entry was
>>> causing
>>> problems. In
>>>
>>> /etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf
>>>
>>> we found the entry
>>>
>>> ...
>>> host_id=2
>>> ...
>>>
>>> But that host id already exists and was alive during deployment process.
>>> So my questions are:
>>>
>>> How is the host id chosen (when adding a new host via GUI)?
>>> Is there an option to preselect the host id in the GUI for a new node?
>>> How can we prevent further duplicate host ids?
>>>
>>> Thanks and best regards,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
>>> Geschäftsführer / CEO
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120
>>> Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
>>> D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
>>>
>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
>>> Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer
>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>
>
> Sollten noch Fragen offen sein, stehen wir Ihnen natürlich jederzeit
> gerne zur Verfügung.
>
> Mit Grüßen aus Dortmund,
> Thomas Klute
>
> --
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
> Geschäftsführer / CEO
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120
> Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
> D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
> Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer
> ________________________________________________________________________
Sollten noch Fragen offen sein, stehen wir Ihnen natürlich jederzeit
gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit Grüßen aus Dortmund,
Thomas Klute
--
________________________________________________________________________
Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
Geschäftsführer / CEO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120
Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer
________________________________________________________________________
10:01 a.m.
Hi Thomas,
I posted https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/90549/ in an attempt to see how
to improve the clarity. The result is in the attachment.
The ID is still different, but the section header shows the hostname
as well. Do you think it would be enough for you? We can't expect
people to touch the DB every time they add a host out of order and the
SPM ID is not selectable by user, because it needs to fit some storage
constraints (we use it for protecting storage metadata) and must match
the hosted engine ID now.
Best regards
Martin Sivak
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Thomas Klute <klute(a)ingenit.com> wrote:
Hi Martin,
I fully understand.
The only reason is that it's not only me administering this oVirt setup,
it's a setup for a client that has 2 local administrators.
We are trying to eliminate any configuration that might cause confusion.
When doing a
hosted-engine --vm-status
a list like this is shown:
--== Host 1 status ==--
...
Hostname : ovirt1.munk.de
Host ID : 1
...
--== Host 2 status ==--
...
Hostname : ovirt3.munk.de
Host ID : 2
...
and so on.
This "Host 2" -> ovirt3 will sooner or later cause confusion and will
lead to administrative actions applied to the wrong hosts.
I'll give it a try and try to align the hosts and ids. I'll backup the
old values in order to be able to roll back the changes if it does not work.
Thanks for your help!!
Best regards,
Thomas
> Hi Thomas,
>
> is there a real need to have them aligned? Both SPM ID and Hosted
> engine ids are quite hidden and accompanied by hostname where visible.
>
> I understand the urge to have everything neatly organized, but playing
> with hosted engine IDs and SPM IDs will bring you nothing but trouble.
>
> Theoretically you could put all hosts to maintenance, hosted engine to
> global maintenance, stop the engine service and update the DB and
> hosted engine config files. Changing anything when active is a big
> NO-NO. And I can't promise stability even if you stop everything
> first.
>
> The short version: Please change hosted engine ID to match SPM ID
> (/etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf) and ignore the hostname
> vs ID mismatch. All other options might cost you..
>
> Best regards
>
> --
> Martin Sivak
> SLA / oVirt
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Klute <klute(a)ingenit.com> wrote:
>> Dear Simone,
>>
>> thanks for the help, I already have noticed, that there is a mismatch
>> between SPM IDs and the hosts.
>> From my knowledge this may be our fault.
>>
>> vds_name | vds_spm_id
>> oVirt4 | 3
>> oVirt2 | 4
>> oVirt6 | 6
>> oVirt5 | 5
>> oVirt1 | 1
>> oVirt3 | 2
>>
>> oVirt3 was re-installed using the node ng image - and was assigned id 2 that
>> was available at that time (taken into account this database query).
>> It was not available in fact because of the host ovirt2 having the host_id=2
>> entry in the configuration on the host and the sanlock having locked the
>> appropriate space.
>>
>> I can't remember where this mismatch came from but I assume that some time
>> ago someone maybe manually changed the entry on oVirt2 host in order to
>> match with the hostname (oVirtX -> Host id X).
>> Thus I think it is not a bug at the moment.
>>
>> But that leads me to the next question:
>>
>> Is there a manual way to align numbers in the hostnames with the SPM IDs?
>> (oVirt4 should be spm id 4)
>>
>> Does this work? Update the database, change the entry in hosted-engine.conf
>> and then reboot the node?
>>
>> Thanks & best regards,
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Martin Sivak <msivak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> the ID should be coming from the SPM ID of the host as assigned by the
>>> engine and duplicates should not be happening indeed.
>>>
>>> Can you please tell us what version of engine you have and how was
>>> first hosted engine node deployed? We recently changed the default
>>> deployment method (4.2.2 in fact) and we would like to know whether
>>> this might be related to that change or not.
>>>
>>> Simone, do you know how to debug this? Are there logs we could use to
>>> check the behavior? The host-deploy logs maybe?
>>
>> Thomas,
>> can you please share the output of
>> sudo -u postgres scl enable rh-postgresql95 -- psql -d engine -c "select
>> vds_id, vds_name, vds_spm_id from vds"
>> executed on the engine VM
>>
>> and the content of /var/log/ovirt-engine/host-deploy (still from the engine
>> VM)?
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> --
>>> Martin Sivak
>>> SLA / oVirt
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Thomas Klute <klute(a)ingenit.com>
wrote:
>>>> Dear oVirt Users,
>>>>
>>>> we installed a third ovirt node using the ovirt node ng image (4.2.2),
>>>> and
>>>> added that node using the web interface of the hosted engine:
>>>>
>>>> Compute->Hosts->New - including the Hosted engine option
"Choose hosted
>>>> engine deployment action" set to "Deploy"
>>>>
>>>> After that we found out, that on the new node the host_id entry was
>>>> causing
>>>> problems. In
>>>>
>>>> /etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf
>>>>
>>>> we found the entry
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>> host_id=2
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> But that host id already exists and was alive during deployment process.
>>>> So my questions are:
>>>>
>>>> How is the host id chosen (when adding a new host via GUI)?
>>>> Is there an option to preselect the host id in the GUI for a new node?
>>>> How can we prevent further duplicate host ids?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and best regards,
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
>>>> Geschäftsführer / CEO
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58
698-120
>>>> Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
>>>> D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
>>>>
>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
>>>> Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer
>>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>
>>
>> Sollten noch Fragen offen sein, stehen wir Ihnen natürlich jederzeit
>> gerne zur Verfügung.
>>
>> Mit Grüßen aus Dortmund,
>> Thomas Klute
>>
>> --
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>
>> Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
>> Geschäftsführer / CEO
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120
>> Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
>> D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
>>
>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
>> Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>
Sollten noch Fragen offen sein, stehen wir Ihnen natürlich jederzeit
gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit Grüßen aus Dortmund,
Thomas Klute
--
________________________________________________________________________
Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
Geschäftsführer / CEO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120
Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer
________________________________________________________________________
11:12 a.m.
Dear Martin,
yes, that's a good improvement!
Just to let you know: The alignment of database and host ids did work
and thus we now have everything aligned and will have an improved output
because of your changes, thanks!
Best regards,
Thomas
Hi Thomas,
I posted https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/90549/ in an attempt to see how
to improve the clarity. The result is in the attachment.
The ID is still different, but the section header shows the hostname
as well. Do you think it would be enough for you? We can't expect
people to touch the DB every time they add a host out of order and the
SPM ID is not selectable by user, because it needs to fit some storage
constraints (we use it for protecting storage metadata) and must match
the hosted engine ID now.
Best regards
Martin Sivak
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Thomas Klute <klute(a)ingenit.com> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I fully understand.
> The only reason is that it's not only me administering this oVirt setup,
> it's a setup for a client that has 2 local administrators.
> We are trying to eliminate any configuration that might cause confusion.
> When doing a
>
> hosted-engine --vm-status
>
> a list like this is shown:
>
> --== Host 1 status ==--
> ...
> Hostname : ovirt1.munk.de
> Host ID : 1
> ...
>
> --== Host 2 status ==--
> ...
> Hostname : ovirt3.munk.de
> Host ID : 2
> ...
>
> and so on.
> This "Host 2" -> ovirt3 will sooner or later cause confusion and will
> lead to administrative actions applied to the wrong hosts.
>
> I'll give it a try and try to align the hosts and ids. I'll backup the
> old values in order to be able to roll back the changes if it does not work.
>
> Thanks for your help!!
> Best regards,
> Thomas
>
>
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> is there a real need to have them aligned? Both SPM ID and Hosted
>> engine ids are quite hidden and accompanied by hostname where visible.
>>
>> I understand the urge to have everything neatly organized, but playing
>> with hosted engine IDs and SPM IDs will bring you nothing but trouble.
>>
>> Theoretically you could put all hosts to maintenance, hosted engine to
>> global maintenance, stop the engine service and update the DB and
>> hosted engine config files. Changing anything when active is a big
>> NO-NO. And I can't promise stability even if you stop everything
>> first.
>>
>> The short version: Please change hosted engine ID to match SPM ID
>> (/etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf) and ignore the hostname
>> vs ID mismatch. All other options might cost you..
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> --
>> Martin Sivak
>> SLA / oVirt
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Thomas Klute <klute(a)ingenit.com> wrote:
>>> Dear Simone,
>>>
>>> thanks for the help, I already have noticed, that there is a mismatch
>>> between SPM IDs and the hosts.
>>> From my knowledge this may be our fault.
>>>
>>> vds_name | vds_spm_id
>>> oVirt4 | 3
>>> oVirt2 | 4
>>> oVirt6 | 6
>>> oVirt5 | 5
>>> oVirt1 | 1
>>> oVirt3 | 2
>>>
>>> oVirt3 was re-installed using the node ng image - and was assigned id 2 that
>>> was available at that time (taken into account this database query).
>>> It was not available in fact because of the host ovirt2 having the host_id=2
>>> entry in the configuration on the host and the sanlock having locked the
>>> appropriate space.
>>>
>>> I can't remember where this mismatch came from but I assume that some
time
>>> ago someone maybe manually changed the entry on oVirt2 host in order to
>>> match with the hostname (oVirtX -> Host id X).
>>> Thus I think it is not a bug at the moment.
>>>
>>> But that leads me to the next question:
>>>
>>> Is there a manual way to align numbers in the hostnames with the SPM IDs?
>>> (oVirt4 should be spm id 4)
>>>
>>> Does this work? Update the database, change the entry in hosted-engine.conf
>>> and then reboot the node?
>>>
>>> Thanks & best regards,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Martin Sivak <msivak(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> the ID should be coming from the SPM ID of the host as assigned by the
>>>> engine and duplicates should not be happening indeed.
>>>>
>>>> Can you please tell us what version of engine you have and how was
>>>> first hosted engine node deployed? We recently changed the default
>>>> deployment method (4.2.2 in fact) and we would like to know whether
>>>> this might be related to that change or not.
>>>>
>>>> Simone, do you know how to debug this? Are there logs we could use to
>>>> check the behavior? The host-deploy logs maybe?
>>> Thomas,
>>> can you please share the output of
>>> sudo -u postgres scl enable rh-postgresql95 -- psql -d engine -c
"select
>>> vds_id, vds_name, vds_spm_id from vds"
>>> executed on the engine VM
>>>
>>> and the content of /var/log/ovirt-engine/host-deploy (still from the engine
>>> VM)?
>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Martin Sivak
>>>> SLA / oVirt
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Thomas Klute <klute(a)ingenit.com>
wrote:
>>>>> Dear oVirt Users,
>>>>>
>>>>> we installed a third ovirt node using the ovirt node ng image
(4.2.2),
>>>>> and
>>>>> added that node using the web interface of the hosted engine:
>>>>>
>>>>> Compute->Hosts->New - including the Hosted engine option
"Choose hosted
>>>>> engine deployment action" set to "Deploy"
>>>>>
>>>>> After that we found out, that on the new node the host_id entry was
>>>>> causing
>>>>> problems. In
>>>>>
>>>>> /etc/ovirt-hosted-engine/hosted-engine.conf
>>>>>
>>>>> we found the entry
>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>> host_id=2
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> But that host id already exists and was alive during deployment
process.
>>>>> So my questions are:
>>>>>
>>>>> How is the host id chosen (when adding a new host via GUI)?
>>>>> Is there an option to preselect the host id in the GUI for a new
node?
>>>>> How can we prevent further duplicate host ids?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks and best regards,
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
________________________________________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>> Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute
klute(a)ingenit.com
>>>>> Geschäftsführer / CEO
>>>>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58
698-120
>>>>> Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58
698-121
>>>>> D-44227 Dortmund
www.ingenit.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
>>>>> Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer
>>>>>
________________________________________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Sollten noch Fragen offen sein, stehen wir Ihnen natürlich jederzeit
>>> gerne zur Verfügung.
>>>
>>> Mit Grüßen aus Dortmund,
>>> Thomas Klute
>>>
>>> --
>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
>>> Geschäftsführer / CEO
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120
>>> Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
>>> D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
>>>
>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
>>> Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer
>>> ________________________________________________________________________
> Sollten noch Fragen offen sein, stehen wir Ihnen natürlich jederzeit
> gerne zur Verfügung.
>
> Mit Grüßen aus Dortmund,
> Thomas Klute
>
> --
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
> Geschäftsführer / CEO
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120
> Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
> D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
> Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
Sollten noch Fragen offen sein, stehen wir Ihnen natürlich jederzeit
gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit Grüßen aus Dortmund,
Thomas Klute
--
________________________________________________________________________
Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Klute klute(a)ingenit.com
Geschäftsführer / CEO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ingenit GmbH & Co. KG Tel. +49 (0)231 58 698-120
Emil-Figge-Strasse 76-80 Fax. +49 (0)231 58 698-121
D-44227 Dortmund www.ingenit.com
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRA 13 914
Gesellschafter : Thomas Klute, Marc-Christian Schröer
________________________________________________________________________
2215
days inactive
2216
days old
7 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Martin Sivak -
Simone Tiraboschi -
Thomas Klute