6:04 p.m.
Well, in fact have got something to work now! Left ovirtmgmt and em1 alone but ran:
$ ovs-vsctl add-br ovsbr0
$ ip link add name veth0 type veth peer name veth1
$ brctl addif ovirtmgmt veth0
$ ovs-vsctl add-port ovsbr veth1
$ ip add add XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX/29 dev veth1
$ ip link set veth0 up && ip link set veth1 up
and now veth1 is responding as-well as veth0.
ovs-vsctl show
08554d11-3ba7-4303-b9d5-6a09f23c9057
Bridge "ovsbr0"
Port "veth1"
Interface "veth1"
Port "ovsbr0"
Interface "ovsbr0"
type: internal
so what I think should do now is create a custom parameter on the Engine Manager that
allows one to define an OVS bridge name and VLAN so when a virtual guest is created it can
be assigned to the new bridge; with the use of a custom hook.
Thanks, Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Daws" <uxbod(a)splatnix.net>
To: "Antoni Segura Puimedon" <asegurap(a)redhat.com>
Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, 27 October, 2014 2:10:34 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 & NAT
Darn, looks like this will not work :( the problem is that oVirt creates the bridge
ovirtmgmt and binds that to your interface eg. em1. So at that point you have network
running. If you then try to add that to the OVS stack your networking stop :( I tried to
add it as a port using ovs-vsctl add-port ovsbr0 ovirtmgmt which is accepted but then
networking stops. As soon as I remove again networking comes back to life. There does not
seem to be a way to have two co-existing bridges :( Thanks, Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Antoni Segura Puimedon" <asegurap(a)redhat.com>
To: "Phil Daws" <uxbod(a)splatnix.net>
Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com>, users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, 27 October, 2014 12:13:30 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 & NAT
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Daws" <uxbod(a)splatnix.net>
To: "Antoni Segura Puimedon" <asegurap(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com>, users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 11:41:56 AM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 & NAT
Hi Antoni:
Yes, prior to the reboot it did work okay. This is how it should look I
believe:
Bridge "ovirtmgmt"
Port "mgmt0"
Interface "mgmt0"
type: internal
Port "ovsbr0"
Interface "ovsbr0"
type: internal
So the bridge would be defined by oVirt then I guess with a custom hook that
would then be added to the OVS stack ?
exactly! You could just make a hook script that runs an after_network_setup
hook that does the ovs-vsctl for you ;-)
Here you can see the presentation I gave last February at devconf about extending
with configurators and hooks.
http://blog.antoni.me/devconf14/#/8/1
I linked directly to a before_network_setup hook sample, because it works just like
the after_network_setup hook. Instead of logging to systemd, just add that if
'remove' is not in data and network == 'ovirtmgmt', it adds the network
bridge to
the vswitch with python's subprocess.call or subprocess.check_output.
You can send it if you want me to take a look ;-)
PS: It is possible to write the hooks in bash, c, perl, etc. But we only have the
convenience read_json methods and such for python. If you wanted to, you could have
a simple bash hook that just checked if there was an ovirtmgmt bridge and it would
add it doing ovs-vsctl in the before_vdsm_start hooking point. That would have the
drawback that changing the ovirtmgmt bridge with oVirt UI would leave it disconnected
again.
Thanks, Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Antoni Segura Puimedon" <asegurap(a)redhat.com>
To: "Phil Daws" <uxbod(a)splatnix.net>
Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com>, users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, 27 October, 2014 9:56:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 & NAT
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Phil Daws" <uxbod(a)splatnix.net>
> To: "Antoni Segura Puimedon" <asegurap(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com>, users(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 10:37:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 & NAT
>
> That is what I tried but oVirt appears to overwrite the bridge information
> on
> boot :( Thanks, Phil
But before rebooting, does it work as you intended? If so, you could just
make
a vdsm hook that adds ovirtmgmt to the ovs bridge after it is set up. (I
could
give more directions into how to do it).
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Antoni Segura Puimedon" <asegurap(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Phil Daws" <uxbod(a)splatnix.net>
> Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com>, users(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, 27 October, 2014 8:00:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 & NAT
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Phil Daws" <uxbod(a)splatnix.net>
> > To: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com>
> > Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
> > Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 5:02:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 & NAT
> >
> > Hmmm, this is becoming difficult ..
> >
> > I have added into the engine the custom hook and understand how that will
> > work. The issue is how can a single NIC use two different bridges ?
> > Example with OVS would be that one requires:
> >
> > em1 -+ ovirtmgmt (bridge) -> management IP (public)
> > + ovs (bridge) -> firewall IP (public)
> > |
> > + vlan 1
> > + vlan 2
> >
> > this works fine when using OVS and KVM, without oVirt, so there must be a
> > way
> > to hook the two together without a Neutron appliance.
> >
> > Any thoughts ? Thanks, Phil.
>
> I haven't tried this, and it may not work, but what happens if you add the
> ovirtmgmt
> bridge as a port of the ovs bridge?
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com>
> > To: "Phil Daws" <uxbod(a)splatnix.net>
> > Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, 22 October, 2014 3:54:46 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] oVirt 3.5 & NAT
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 03:12:09PM +0100, Phil Daws wrote:
> > > Thanks Dan & Antoni:
> > >
> > > I wonder then if I could replace the standard libvirt defined network
> > > with
> > > an OpenVSwitch one like I have on my dev system? That is just straight
> > > KVM with OVS integrated. Maybe a bit more overhead in administration
> > > but
> > > possibly less than having to spin up a Neutron Appliance.
> >
> > Once you start to use the vdsm-hook-extnet, all that you need to do is
> > to replace the libvirt-side definition of the "external network".
This
> > may well be an OpenVSwitch-based network e.g.
> > http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#elementVlanTag
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users(a)ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
3679
days inactive
3679
days old
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Phil Daws