oVirt Survey 2019 results
Thanks to the 143 participants to oVirt Survey 2019! The survey is now closed and results are publicly available at https://bit.ly/2JYlI7U We'll analyze collected data in order to improve oVirt thanks to your feedback. As a first step after reading the results I'd like to invite the 30 persons who replied they're willing to contribute code to send an email to devel@ovirt.org introducing themselves: we'll be more than happy to welcome them and helping them getting started. I would also like to invite the 17 people who replied they'd like to help organizing oVirt events in their area to either get in touch with me or introduce themselves to users@ovirt.org so we can discuss about events organization. Last but not least I'd like to invite the 38 people willing to contribute documentation and the one willing to contribute localization to introduce themselves to devel@ovirt.org. Thanks! -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 9:36 AM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Thanks to the 143 participants to oVirt Survey 2019! The survey is now closed and results are publicly available at https://bit.ly/2JYlI7U We'll analyze collected data in order to improve oVirt thanks to your feedback.
As a first step after reading the results I'd like to invite the 30 persons who replied they're willing to contribute code to send an email to devel@ovirt.org introducing themselves: we'll be more than happy to welcome them and helping them getting started.
I would also like to invite the 17 people who replied they'd like to help organizing oVirt events in their area to either get in touch with me or introduce themselves to users@ovirt.org so we can discuss about events organization.
Last but not least I'd like to invite the 38 people willing to contribute documentation and the one willing to contribute localization to introduce themselves to devel@ovirt.org.
Thanks!
and thank you, Sandro, for shepherding this survey. It has, as usual, very interesting results. I am happily surprised to see how many are using OvS, OVN and IPv6. I am less happy (but unsurprised) to see that nobody responded that they were using Fedora-based oVirt. I know the survey is anonymous, but I would love to reach out and obtain more information about the painful use case of whomever answered What is the most challenging flow in oVirt? with "Working with networks." I would love to hear more about your (and others'!) challenges, and see how we developers can ease them.
Regarding the IPv6 question: "If you are using IPv6 for hosts, which kind of addressing you are using"? "Dynamic or Static?" I would add 'AutoConf' as well Thx Roni On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 10:30 AM Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 9:36 AM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Thanks to the 143 participants to oVirt Survey 2019! The survey is now closed and results are publicly available at
We'll analyze collected data in order to improve oVirt thanks to your feedback.
As a first step after reading the results I'd like to invite the 30
https://bit.ly/2JYlI7U persons who replied they're willing to contribute code to send an email to devel@ovirt.org introducing themselves: we'll be more than happy to welcome them and helping them getting started.
I would also like to invite the 17 people who replied they'd like to
help organizing oVirt events in their area to either get in touch with me or introduce themselves to users@ovirt.org so we can discuss about events organization.
Last but not least I'd like to invite the 38 people willing to
contribute documentation and the one willing to contribute localization to introduce themselves to devel@ovirt.org.
Thanks!
and thank you, Sandro, for shepherding this survey.
It has, as usual, very interesting results. I am happily surprised to see how many are using OvS, OVN and IPv6. I am less happy (but unsurprised) to see that nobody responded that they were using Fedora-based oVirt.
I know the survey is anonymous, but I would love to reach out and obtain more information about the painful use case of whomever answered What is the most challenging flow in oVirt? with "Working with networks." I would love to hear more about your (and others'!) challenges, and see how we developers can ease them. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/LLP7KDV7WFYFQR...
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 12:07 PM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Thanks to the 143 participants to oVirt Survey 2019! The survey is now closed and results are publicly available at https://bit.ly/2JYlI7U We'll analyze collected data in order to improve oVirt thanks to your feedback.
As a first step after reading the results I'd like to invite the 30 persons who replied they're willing to contribute code to send an email to devel@ovirt.org introducing themselves: we'll be more than happy to welcome them and helping them getting started.
I would also like to invite the 17 people who replied they'd like to help organizing oVirt events in their area to either get in touch with me or introduce themselves to users@ovirt.org so we can discuss about events organization.
Last but not least I'd like to invite the 38 people willing to contribute documentation and the one willing to contribute localization to introduce themselves to devel@ovirt.org.
Thank you all for the feedback. I was looking at the feedback specific to Gluster. While it's disheartening to see "Gluster weakest link in oVirt", I can understand where the feedback and frustration is coming from. Over the past month and in this survey, the common themes that have come up - Ensure smoother upgrades for the hyperconverged deployments with GlusterFS. The oVirt 4.3 release with upgrade to gluster 5.3 caused disruption for many users and we want to ensure this does not happen again. To this end, we are working on adding upgrade tests to OST based CI . Contributions are welcome. - improve performance on gluster storage domain. While we have seen promising results with gluster 6 release this is an ongoing effort. Please help this effort with inputs on the specific workloads and usecases that you run, gathering data and running tests. - deployment issues. We have worked to improve the deployment flow in 4.3 by adding pre-checks and changing to gluster-ansible role based deployment. We would love to hear specific issues that you're facing around this - please raise bugs if you haven't already ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=cockpit-ovirt)
Thanks! --
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/4N5DYCXY2S6ZAU...
Thanks Sahina for including Gluster community mailing lists. As Sahina already mentioned we had a strong focus on upgrade testing path before releasing glusterfs-6. We conducted test day and along with functional pieces, tested upgrade paths like from 3.12, 4 & 5 to release-6, we encountered problems but we fixed them before releasing glusterfs-6. So overall this experience should definitely improve with glusterfs-6. On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 15:16, Sahina Bose <sabose@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 12:07 PM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Thanks to the 143 participants to oVirt Survey 2019! The survey is now closed and results are publicly available at https://bit.ly/2JYlI7U We'll analyze collected data in order to improve oVirt thanks to your feedback.
As a first step after reading the results I'd like to invite the 30 persons who replied they're willing to contribute code to send an email to devel@ovirt.org introducing themselves: we'll be more than happy to welcome them and helping them getting started.
I would also like to invite the 17 people who replied they'd like to help organizing oVirt events in their area to either get in touch with me or introduce themselves to users@ovirt.org so we can discuss about events organization.
Last but not least I'd like to invite the 38 people willing to contribute documentation and the one willing to contribute localization to introduce themselves to devel@ovirt.org.
Thank you all for the feedback. I was looking at the feedback specific to Gluster. While it's disheartening to see "Gluster weakest link in oVirt", I can understand where the feedback and frustration is coming from.
Over the past month and in this survey, the common themes that have come up - Ensure smoother upgrades for the hyperconverged deployments with GlusterFS. The oVirt 4.3 release with upgrade to gluster 5.3 caused disruption for many users and we want to ensure this does not happen again. To this end, we are working on adding upgrade tests to OST based CI . Contributions are welcome.
- improve performance on gluster storage domain. While we have seen promising results with gluster 6 release this is an ongoing effort. Please help this effort with inputs on the specific workloads and usecases that you run, gathering data and running tests.
- deployment issues. We have worked to improve the deployment flow in 4.3 by adding pre-checks and changing to gluster-ansible role based deployment. We would love to hear specific issues that you're facing around this - please raise bugs if you haven't already ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=cockpit-ovirt)
Thanks! --
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/4N5DYCXY2S6ZAU...
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
-- --Atin
Thank you for organizing this Sandro! Surveys like this are always great for helping to inform and improve the user experience of the application. Also to learn more about the users who are using it. On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:31 AM Sahina Bose <sabose@redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 12:07 PM Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Thanks to the 143 participants to oVirt Survey 2019! The survey is now closed and results are publicly available at https://bit.ly/2JYlI7U We'll analyze collected data in order to improve oVirt thanks to your feedback.
As a first step after reading the results I'd like to invite the 30 persons who replied they're willing to contribute code to send an email to devel@ovirt.org introducing themselves: we'll be more than happy to welcome them and helping them getting started.
I would also like to invite the 17 people who replied they'd like to help organizing oVirt events in their area to either get in touch with me or introduce themselves to users@ovirt.org so we can discuss about events organization.
Last but not least I'd like to invite the 38 people willing to contribute documentation and the one willing to contribute localization to introduce themselves to devel@ovirt.org.
Thank you all for the feedback. I was looking at the feedback specific to Gluster. While it's disheartening to see "Gluster weakest link in oVirt", I can understand where the feedback and frustration is coming from.
Over the past month and in this survey, the common themes that have come up - Ensure smoother upgrades for the hyperconverged deployments with GlusterFS. The oVirt 4.3 release with upgrade to gluster 5.3 caused disruption for many users and we want to ensure this does not happen again. To this end, we are working on adding upgrade tests to OST based CI . Contributions are welcome.
- improve performance on gluster storage domain. While we have seen promising results with gluster 6 release this is an ongoing effort. Please help this effort with inputs on the specific workloads and usecases that you run, gathering data and running tests.
- deployment issues. We have worked to improve the deployment flow in 4.3 by adding pre-checks and changing to gluster-ansible role based deployment. We would love to hear specific issues that you're facing around this - please raise bugs if you haven't already ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=cockpit-ovirt)
Thanks! --
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
sbonazzo@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/4N5DYCXY2S6ZAU...
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/BF4TKC2MIROT7Q...
-- LAURA WRIGHT ASSOCIATE INTERACTION DESIGNER, UXD TEAM Red Hat Massachusetts <https://www.redhat.com/> 314 Littleton Rd lwright@redhat.com <https://red.ht/sig>
participants (6)
-
Atin Mukherjee -
Dan Kenigsberg -
Laura Wright -
Roni Eliezer -
Sahina Bose -
Sandro Bonazzola