3:59 p.m.
Hi!
I'd like to try the HCI Rollout
https://ovirt.org/documentation/gluster-hyperconverged/chap-Deploying_Hyp... on
my oVirt Infrastructure.
The hosts have "nested virtualization" active, but when starting the Hosted
Engine deployment from cockpit an the error "Hardware virtualization is not supported
on this host" occurs.
cat /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/nested
Y
Any ideas on this?
4:08 p.m.
On the three VMs for the HCI rollout:
virt-host-validate
QEMU: Checking for hardware virtualization : FAIL (Only
emulated CPUs are available, performance will be significantly limited)
QEMU: Checking if device /dev/vhost-net exists : PASS
QEMU: Checking if device /dev/net/tun exists : PASS
QEMU: Checking for cgroup 'memory' controller support :
PASS
QEMU: Checking for cgroup 'memory' controller mount-point :
PASS
QEMU: Checking for cgroup 'cpu' controller support :
PASS
QEMU: Checking for cgroup 'cpu' controller mount-point :
PASS
QEMU: Checking for cgroup 'cpuacct' controller support :
PASS
QEMU: Checking for cgroup 'cpuacct' controller mount-point :
PASS
QEMU: Checking for cgroup 'cpuset' controller support :
PASS
QEMU: Checking for cgroup 'cpuset' controller mount-point :
PASS
QEMU: Checking for cgroup 'devices' controller support :
PASS
QEMU: Checking for cgroup 'devices' controller mount-point :
PASS
QEMU: Checking for cgroup 'blkio' controller support :
PASS
QEMU: Checking for cgroup 'blkio' controller mount-point :
PASS
WARN (Unknown if this platform has IOMMU support)
LXC: Checking for Linux >= 2.6.26 : PASS
LXC: Checking for namespace ipc : PASS
LXC: Checking for namespace mnt : PASS
LXC: Checking for namespace pid : PASS
LXC: Checking for namespace uts : PASS
LXC: Checking for namespace net : PASS
LXC: Checking for namespace user : PASS
LXC: Checking for cgroup 'memory' controller support :
PASS
LXC: Checking for cgroup 'memory' controller mount-point :
PASS
LXC: Checking for cgroup 'cpu' controller support :
PASS
LXC: Checking for cgroup 'cpu' controller mount-point :
PASS
LXC: Checking for cgroup 'cpuacct' controller support :
PASS
LXC: Checking for cgroup 'cpuacct' controller mount-point :
PASS
LXC: Checking for cgroup 'cpuset' controller support :
PASS
LXC: Checking for cgroup 'cpuset' controller mount-point :
PASS
LXC: Checking for cgroup 'devices' controller support :
PASS
LXC: Checking for cgroup 'devices' controller mount-point :
PASS
LXC: Checking for cgroup 'blkio' controller support :
PASS
LXC: Checking for cgroup 'blkio' controller mount-point :
PASS
LXC: Checking if device /sys/fs/fuse/connections exists : FAIL (Load
the 'fuse' module to enable /proc/ overrides)
[root@hci1 ~]# cat /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/nested
cat: /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/nested: No such file or directory
[root@hci1 ~]# modprobe kvm_intel
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'kvm_intel': Operation not supported
5 p.m.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:09 PM Markus Schaufler <
markus.schaufler(a)digit-all.at> wrote:
On the three VMs for the HCI rollout:
virt-host-validate
QEMU: Checking for hardware virtualization
: FAIL (Only emulated CPUs are available, performance will be
significantly limited)
What is your L0 platform, so your used virtualization platform used on
physical host(s)?
[root@hci1 ~]# cat /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/nested
cat: /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/nested: No such file or directory
[root@hci1 ~]# modprobe kvm_intel
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'kvm_intel': Operation not supported
_______________________________________________
Can you resemble your L0 OS/ virtualization sw and L1 OS too?
Gianluca
5:26 p.m.
Centos 7.5, ovirt 4.2.7
it works when pinpointing the vm's to a host and enable cpu-passthrough.
but i presume it should work without this workaround too.
6:10 p.m.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 3:29 PM Markus Schaufler <
markus.schaufler(a)digit-all.at> wrote:
Centos 7.5, ovirt 4.2.7
it works when pinpointing the vm's to a host and enable cpu-passthrough.
but i presume it should work without this workaround too.
_______________________________________________
If I remember correctly there is no support/consistence for the L2 systems,
that are guests inside an L1 system that is migrated.
So perhaps this limitation drove to force host pinning and prevent having
unpredictable results for L2 guests
See also here:
https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Nested_Guests
HIH,
Gianluca
5:18 p.m.
On 11 Dec 2018, at 16:10, Gianluca Cecchi
<gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 3:29 PM Markus Schaufler <markus.schaufler(a)digit-all.at
<mailto:markus.schaufler@digit-all.at>> wrote:
Centos 7.5, ovirt 4.2.7
it works when pinpointing the vm's to a host and enable cpu-passthrough.
but i presume it should work without this workaround too.
_______________________________________________
If I remember correctly there is no support/consistence for the L2 systems, that are
guests inside an L1 system that is migrated.
So perhaps this limitation drove to force host pinning and prevent having unpredictable
results for L2 guests
it’s not really done because of that - it’s rather that by default none of the named CPU
models are adding vmx and so the guest doesn’t look like capable of virtualization. Cpu
passthrough does, because it passes all the flags, but it also enforces host pinning.
Which is then a nice coincidence because indeed the migration wouldn’t work anyway:)
And it’s something to keep in mind now in later 4.2.z and 4.3 where we now allow migration
of VMs with cpu passthrough. But it’s not for this use case and there nested environment
still doesn’t support migration properly and you need to make sure not to migrate.
See also here:
https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Nested_Guests
<https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Nested_Guests>
HIH,
Gianluca
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/Y2T3RXLPTMB...
7:40 p.m.
Hi Markus,
What's the out put of
egrep "vmx|svm" "/proc/cpuinfo"
When the out put does not return any thing you will get "Hardware
virtualization is not supported on this host"
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:50 PM Michal Skrivanek <
michal.skrivanek(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 11 Dec 2018, at 16:10, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 3:29 PM Markus Schaufler <
markus.schaufler(a)digit-all.at> wrote:
> Centos 7.5, ovirt 4.2.7
> it works when pinpointing the vm's to a host and enable cpu-passthrough.
> but i presume it should work without this workaround too.
> _______________________________________________
>
>
If I remember correctly there is no support/consistence for the L2
systems, that are guests inside an L1 system that is migrated.
So perhaps this limitation drove to force host pinning and prevent having
unpredictable results for L2 guests
it’s not really done because of that - it’s rather that by default none of
the named CPU models are adding vmx and so the guest doesn’t look like
capable of virtualization. Cpu passthrough does, because it passes all the
flags, but it also enforces host pinning. Which is then a nice coincidence
because indeed the migration wouldn’t work anyway:)
And it’s something to keep in mind now in later 4.2.z and 4.3 where we now
allow migration of VMs with cpu passthrough. But it’s not for this use case
and there nested environment still doesn’t support migration properly and
you need to make sure not to migrate.
See also here:
https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Nested_Guests
HIH,
Gianluca
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/Y2T3RXLPTMB...
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/I4VT2YVVO6H...
--
Thanks,
Gobinda
2171
days inactive
2173
days old
7 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Gianluca Cecchi -
Gobinda Das -
Markus Schaufler -
Michal Skrivanek