6:52 a.m.
--_0874d0f6-c890-4cdd-bab8-d423a76a17e9_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have an affinity group with negative polarity=2C with enforcing set to ha=
rd. The problem I have is that both guest VMs are still on the same host. A=
rent they supposed to be on different hosts when negative affinity is set? =
=
--_0874d0f6-c890-4cdd-bab8-d423a76a17e9_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt=3B
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>I have an affinity
group with ne=
gative polarity=2C with enforcing set to hard. The problem I have is that b=
oth guest VMs are still on the same host. Arent they supposed to be on diff=
erent hosts when negative affinity is set? </div></body>
</html>=
--_0874d0f6-c890-4cdd-bab8-d423a76a17e9_--
9:24 a.m.
Hi Maurice,
We have a bug on it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1080515
I'm going to fail the creation of an affinity group if it's violating the
constraints.
will that solve your problem?
Thanks,
Gilad.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maurice James" <midnightsteel(a)msn.com>
To: users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 4:52:58 PM
Subject: [Users] Affinity Groups
I have an affinity group with negative polarity, with enforcing set to hard.
The problem I have is that both guest VMs are still on the same host. Arent
they supposed to be on different hosts when negative affinity is set?
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
9:38 a.m.
--_561e8cea-4afd-4687-9c0a-ea6f25c4e18e_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Shouldnt the negative affinity group keep the two guests apart? And a posit=
ive affinity group keep them together? I just wanted to make sure that I un=
derstand it correctly
Date: Mon=2C 31 Mar 2014 12:24:36 -0400
From: gchaplik(a)redhat.com
To: midnightsteel(a)msn.com
CC: users(a)ovirt.org=3B msivak(a)redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Users] Affinity Groups
=20
Hi Maurice=2C
=20
We have a bug on it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1080515
=20
I'm going to fail the creation of an affinity group if it's violating the=
constraints.
will that solve your problem?
=20
Thanks=2C=20
Gilad.
=20
=20
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Maurice James" <midnightsteel(a)msn.com>
> To: users(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday=2C March 31=2C 2014 4:52:58 PM
> Subject: [Users] Affinity Groups
>=20
> I have an affinity group with negative polarity=2C with enforcing set t=
o
hard.
> The problem I have is that both guest VMs are still on the same
host. A=
rent
> they supposed to be on different hosts when negative affinity is
set?
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>=20
=
--_561e8cea-4afd-4687-9c0a-ea6f25c4e18e_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt=3B
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>Shouldnt the
negative affinity g=
roup keep the two guests apart? And a positive affinity group keep them tog=
ether? I just wanted to make sure that I understand it
correctly<br><br><di=
v>>=3B Date: Mon=2C 31 Mar 2014 12:24:36 -0400<br>>=3B From:
gchaplik@r=
edhat.com<br>>=3B To: midnightsteel(a)msn.com<br>&gt=3B CC:
users(a)ovirt.org=
=3B msivak(a)redhat.com<br>&gt=3B Subject: Re: [Users] Affinity
Groups<br>>=
=3B <br>>=3B Hi Maurice=2C<br>>=3B <br>>=3B We have a
bug on it:<br>&=
gt=3B https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1080515<br>>=3B <br>>=3B I'm
going to=
fail the creation of an affinity group if it's violating the constraints.<=
br>>=3B will that solve your problem?<br>>=3B <br>>=3B
Thanks=2C <br>=
>=3B Gilad.<br>>=3B <br>>=3B <br>>=3B -----
Original Message -----<=
br>>=3B >=3B From: "Maurice James"
&lt=3Bmidnightsteel(a)msn.com&gt=3B<br=
>=3B >=3B To: users(a)ovirt.org<br>&gt=3B
>=3B Sent: Monday=2C March 3=
1=2C 2014 4:52:58 PM<br>>=3B
>=3B Subject: [Users] Affinity Groups<br>&=
gt=3B >=3B <br>>=3B >=3B I have an affinity group with negative
polar=
ity=2C with enforcing set to hard.<br>>=3B >=3B The problem I have is
t=
hat both guest VMs are still on the same host. Arent<br>>=3B >=3B they
=
supposed to be on different hosts when negative affinity is set?<br>>=3B =
>=3B <br>>=3B >=3B
_______________________________________________<br=
>=3B >=3B Users mailing list<br>>=3B
>=3B Users(a)ovirt.org<br>&gt=
=3B >=3B
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users<br>>=3B >=3B <=
br></div> </div></body>
</html>=
--_561e8cea-4afd-4687-9c0a-ea6f25c4e18e_--
9:47 a.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maurice James" <midnightsteel(a)msn.com>
To: "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik(a)redhat.com>
Cc: users(a)ovirt.org, "Martin Sivak" <msivak(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 7:38:55 PM
Subject: RE: [Users] Affinity Groups
Shouldnt the negative affinity group keep the two guests apart? And a
positive affinity group keep them together? I just wanted to make sure that
I understand it correctly
for hard enforcing you are correct.
for addition reference see: http://www.ovirt.org/Features/VM-Affinity
> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:24:36 -0400
> From: gchaplik(a)redhat.com
> To: midnightsteel(a)msn.com
> CC: users(a)ovirt.org; msivak(a)redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Users] Affinity Groups
>
> Hi Maurice,
>
> We have a bug on it:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1080515
>
> I'm going to fail the creation of an affinity group if it's violating the
> constraints.
> will that solve your problem?
>
> Thanks,
> Gilad.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Maurice James" <midnightsteel(a)msn.com>
> > To: users(a)ovirt.org
> > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 4:52:58 PM
> > Subject: [Users] Affinity Groups
> >
> > I have an affinity group with negative polarity, with enforcing set to
> > hard.
> > The problem I have is that both guest VMs are still on the same host.
> > Arent
> > they supposed to be on different hosts when negative affinity is set?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users(a)ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
7:55 a.m.
Yes; Positive affinity makes sure all group members run on the same host.
Negative affinity makes sure all group members run on separate hosts.
We do have strong/weak attribute which makes this best effort if you wish to
avoid failures.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maurice James" <midnightsteel(a)msn.com>
To: "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik(a)redhat.com>
Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 7:38:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] Affinity Groups
Shouldnt the negative affinity group keep the two guests apart? And a
positive affinity group keep them together? I just wanted to make sure that
I understand it correctly
> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:24:36 -0400
> From: gchaplik(a)redhat.com
> To: midnightsteel(a)msn.com
> CC: users(a)ovirt.org; msivak(a)redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Users] Affinity Groups
>
> Hi Maurice,
>
> We have a bug on it:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1080515
>
> I'm going to fail the creation of an affinity group if it's violating the
> constraints.
> will that solve your problem?
>
> Thanks,
> Gilad.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Maurice James" <midnightsteel(a)msn.com>
> > To: users(a)ovirt.org
> > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 4:52:58 PM
> > Subject: [Users] Affinity Groups
> >
> > I have an affinity group with negative polarity, with enforcing set to
> > hard.
> > The problem I have is that both guest VMs are still on the same host.
> > Arent
> > they supposed to be on different hosts when negative affinity is set?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users(a)ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
3677
days inactive
3680
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Doron Fediuck -
Gilad Chaplik -
Maurice James