[Users] request for WOL
I would like to request Wake on LAN support be added to the Power Management interface. It seems like a good fall back for anyone who doesn't have proper power management capabilities. -- Gary Scarborough IST Lab Manager Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester NY
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Scarborough" <virtuallymad@gmail.com> To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 3:58:41 PM Subject: [Users] request for WOL
I would like to request Wake on LAN support be added to the Power Management interface. It seems like a good fall back for anyone who doesn't have proper power management capabilities.
Fencing needs to reboot a node, WOL would only wake it up if it was suspended.
-- Gary Scarborough IST Lab Manager Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester NY
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Date: Tue=2C 1 May 2012 17:20:24 -0400 From: acathrow@redhat.com To: virtuallymad@gmail.com CC: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] request for WOL =20 =20 =20 ----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Scarborough" <virtuallymad@gmail.com> To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Tuesday=2C May 1=2C 2012 3:58:41 PM Subject: [Users] request for WOL =20 =20 I would like to request Wake on LAN support be added to the Power Management interface. It seems like a good fall back for anyone who doesn't have proper power management capabilities. =20 Fencing needs to reboot a node=2C WOL would only wake it up if it was sus=
--_ac814dda-1816-4974-9d7b-2b3ef0e06e8e_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable pended.
=20 =20
=20 -- Gary Scarborough IST Lab Manager Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester NY =20 But it could issue the reboot command via SSH no?I was also interested in W= OL and curious as to why it wasn't in there already. WOL allows the system = to go into standby for power management (less desirable than Off=2C but sta= ndby could return to service faster). For poweroff=2C the shutdown command = could be passed via SSH=2C but the system would have to prompt that manual = booting would be required. Unless the system supports boot on WOL request.= =
--_ac814dda-1816-4974-9d7b-2b3ef0e06e8e_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html> <head> <style><!-- .hmmessage P { margin:0px=3B padding:0px } body.hmmessage { font-size: 10pt=3B font-family:Tahoma } --></style></head> <body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'> >=3B Date: Tue=2C 1 May 2012 17:20:24 -0400<br>>=3B From: acathrow@redh= at.com<br>>=3B To: virtuallymad@gmail.com<br>>=3B CC: users@ovirt.org<b= r>>=3B Subject: Re: [Users] request for WOL<br>>=3B <br>>=3B <br>>= =3B <br>>=3B ----- Original Message -----<br>>=3B >=3B From: "Gary Sc= arborough" <=3Bvirtuallymad@gmail.com>=3B<br>>=3B >=3B To: users@ov= irt.org<br>>=3B >=3B Sent: Tuesday=2C May 1=2C 2012 3:58:41 PM<br>>= =3B >=3B Subject: [Users] request for WOL<br>>=3B >=3B <br>>=3B >= =3B <br>>=3B >=3B I would like to request Wake on LAN support be added = to the Power<br>>=3B >=3B Management interface. It seems like a good fa= ll back for anyone who<br>>=3B >=3B doesn't have proper power managemen= t capabilities.<br>>=3B <br>>=3B Fencing needs to reboot a node=2C WOL = would only wake it up if it was suspended.<br>>=3B <br>>=3B <br>>=3B = >=3B <br>>=3B >=3B --<br>>=3B >=3B Gary Scarborough<br>>=3B >= =3B IST Lab Manager<br>>=3B >=3B Rochester Institute of Technology<br>&= gt=3B >=3B Rochester NY<br>>=3B >=3B <br>But it could issue the reboo= t command via SSH no?<BR>I was also interested in WOL and curious as to why= it wasn't in there already. WOL allows the system to go into standby for p= ower management (less desirable than Off=2C but standby could return to ser= vice faster). For poweroff=2C the shutdown command could be passed via SSH= =2C but the system would have to prompt that manual booting would be requir= ed. =3B Unless the system supports boot on WOL request.<BR> = </div></body> </html>= --_ac814dda-1816-4974-9d7b-2b3ef0e06e8e_--
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicholas Kesick" <cybertimber2000@hotmail.com> To: "oVirt Mailing List" <users@ovirt.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 5:29:42 PM Subject: Re: [Users] request for WOL
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 17:20:24 -0400 From: acathrow@redhat.com To: virtuallymad@gmail.com CC: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [Users] request for WOL
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Scarborough" <virtuallymad@gmail.com> To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 3:58:41 PM Subject: [Users] request for WOL
I would like to request Wake on LAN support be added to the Power Management interface. It seems like a good fall back for anyone who doesn't have proper power management capabilities.
Fencing needs to reboot a node, WOL would only wake it up if it was suspended.
-- Gary Scarborough IST Lab Manager Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester NY
But it could issue the reboot command via SSH no?
No. Fencing is used when the node is not responsive, if we could ssh into it then it's unlikely we'd be fencing it. When a node isn't responsive we need a mechanism to reset it but also confirm that it's been "dealt with", so using IPMI (which is in nearly all servers today, even whitebox), iLO, DRAC, IMM, etc allows us to connect to the management controller reboot it and confirm that it's been reset. Other approaches we can take involve extending our use of sanlock.
I was also interested in WOL and curious as to why it wasn't in there already. WOL allows the system to go into standby for power management (less desirable than Off, but standby could return to
actually more desirable than off in many cases - for example in the cluster policy we could put a node into powersaving mode and more quickly resurrect it when required. That's been on "the list" for a long time - just needs patches .....
service faster). For poweroff, the shutdown command could be passed via SSH, but the system would have to prompt that manual booting would be required. Unless the system supports boot on WOL request.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
participants (3)
-
Andrew Cathrow -
Gary Scarborough -
Nicholas Kesick