Re: [ovirt-users] Ubuntu/Debian support?

17 Nov 2014


      ...
=20=0D=0A> So, a quick non-scientific poll...=0D=0A>=20=0D=0A> Motivatio=
n: It has been suggested that adding ubuntu or debian distro=20=0D=0A> su=
------=_Part_34_1227848300.1416224045438
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="=_+Otqq-T6StBlXf0y-elLOXdNu7e2jnb9B-i7zCL8lNPcQ1vL"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Your mail reader does not
understand MIME message format.
--=_+Otqq-T6StBlXf0y-elLOXdNu7e2jnb9B-i7zCL8lNPcQ1vL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,=0D=0A=0D=0A1) I hope this is still an issue, mostly because I woul=
d really love to use mandos[1] on the engine, and that only works with De=
bian/Ubuntu.=0D=0A2) Can't comment on, I'm just a user, after all.=0D=0A3=
) Can't comment on, I'm just a user, after all.=0D=0A4) Debian GNU/Linux =
has things in its standard repositories that are useful for very small sy=
stems. Examples: drbd and the pacemaker resource agent for iSCSI.=0D=0A5)=
 See 1)=0D=0A6) Debian, mostly because of personal preferrence.=0D=0A7) E=
ngine, I think it would be useful for more users because of mandos.=0D=0A=
=0D=0A[1]https://wiki.recompile.se/wiki/Mandos=0D=0A=0D=0ARegards,=0D=0A=0D=
=0Amots=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Nachricht-----=0D=0A> Vo=
n:Itamar Heim <iheim@redhat.com <mailto:iheim@redhat.com> >=0D=0A> Gesend=
et: Mon 17 November 2014 11:00=0D=0A> An: users@ovirt.org <mailto:users@o=
virt.org>=20=0D=0A> Betreff: [ovirt-users] Ubuntu/Debian support=3F=0D=0A=
pport could broaden the reach of the oVirt community.=0D=0A> To date, the=
re has been some work towards this goal, but it is not=20=0D=0A> "coming =
to a conclusion".=0D=0A>=20=0D=0A> Questions that comes to mind:=0D=0A>=20=
=0D=0A> 1) Is this still an issue=3F=0D=0A> 2) Can we afford to dilute th=
e focus we have as it is hard enough to=0D=0A>     stabilize the currentl=
y supported distro's=3F is it worth the=0D=0A>     potential impact=3F=0D=
=0A> 3) Would it have maintainers catering to it so it won't be left behi=
nd=0D=0A>     / delay development=3F=0D=0A> 4) Why bother with host suppo=
rt, ovirt-node can be used=3F=0D=0A> 5) Why bother with engine support, a=
 virtual appliance or a docker=0D=0A>     image could be used=3F=0D=0A> 6=
) if we do it, should we focus on Ubuntu or Debian distro first=3F=0D=0A>=
 7) if we do it, should we focus on host or engine first=3F=0D=0A>=20=0D=0A=
...
Thoughts=3F=0D=0A>=20=0D=0A> Thanks,=0D=0A>     Itamar=0D=0A> _________=
______________________________________=0D=0A> Users mailing list=0D=0A> U=
sers@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>=20=0D=0A> http://lists.ovirt.org/=
mailman/listinfo/users <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>=20=
=0D=0A>=20=0D=0A=0D=0A
--=_+Otqq-T6StBlXf0y-elLOXdNu7e2jnb9B-i7zCL8lNPcQ1vL
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=0D=0A<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "htt=
p://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"><html>=0D=0A<head>=0D=0A  <meta name=3D=
"Generator" content=3D"Zarafa WebApp v7.1.10-44973">=0D=0A  <meta http-eq=
uiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8">=0D=0A  <titl=
e>AW: [ovirt-users] Ubuntu/Debian support=3F</title>=0D=0A</head>=0D=0A<b=
ody>=0D=0A<font face=3D"tahoma" size=3D"2">Hello,</font><br><br>1) I hope=
 this is still an issue, mostly because I would really love to use mandos=
[1] on the engine, and that only works with Debian/Ubuntu.<br>2) Can't co=
mment on, I'm just a user, after all.<br>3) Can't comment on, I'm just a =
user, after all.<br>4) Debian GNU/Linux has things in its standard reposi=
tories that are useful for very small systems. Examples: drbd and the pac=
emaker resource agent for iSCSI.<br>5) See 1)<br>6) Debian, mostly becaus=
e of personal preferrence.<br>7) Engine, I think it would be useful for m=
ore users because of mandos.<br><br>[1]https://wiki.recompile.se/wiki/Man=
dos<br><br>Regards,<br><br>mots<br><pre style=3D"white-space: -moz-pre-wr=
ap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; white-space: pre-wr=
ap; word-wrap: break-word;" wrap=3D""><br>-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Nachric=
ht-----<br>> Von:Itamar Heim <<a href=3D"mailto:iheim@redhat.com">i=
heim@redhat.com</a>><br>> Gesendet: Mon 17 November 2014 11:00<br>&=
gt; An: <a href=3D"mailto:users@ovirt.org">users@ovirt.org</a><br>> Be=
treff: [ovirt-users] Ubuntu/Debian support=3F<br>> <br>> So, a quic=
k non-scientific poll...<br>> <br>> Motivation: It has been suggest=
ed that adding ubuntu or debian distro <br>> support could broaden the=
 reach of the oVirt community.<br>> To date, there has been some work =
towards this goal, but it is not <br>> "coming to a conclusion".<br>&g=
t; <br>> Questions that comes to mind:<br>> <br>> 1) Is this sti=
ll an issue=3F<br>> 2) Can we afford to dilute the focus we have as it=
 is hard enough to<br>>     stabilize the currently supported distro's=
=3F is it worth the<br>>     potential impact=3F<br>> 3) Would it h=
ave maintainers catering to it so it won't be left behind<br>>     / d=
elay development=3F<br>> 4) Why bother with host support, ovirt-node c=
an be used=3F<br>> 5) Why bother with engine support, a virtual applia=
nce or a docker<br>>     image could be used=3F<br>> 6) if we do it=
, should we focus on Ubuntu or Debian distro first=3F<br>> 7) if we do=
 it, should we focus on host or engine first=3F<br>> <br>> Thoughts=
=3F<br>> <br>> Thanks,<br>>     Itamar<br>> _________________=
______________________________<br>> Users mailing list<br>> <a href=
=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org">Users@ovirt.org</a><br>> <a href=3D"http:/=
/lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.o=
virt.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>> </pre>=0D=0A</body>=0D=0A</ht=
ml>
--=_+Otqq-T6StBlXf0y-elLOXdNu7e2jnb9B-i7zCL8lNPcQ1vL--

------=_Part_34_1227848300.1416224045438
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: CIPHERMAIL (2.8.6-4)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUad0tAAoJELfzdzVzTtoKvOwH/j7P6NuwxvwnIqquoHYADzyn
36sPwzS2gDKn5+8wzuij7tvBlIyTf2lR2QyFDao2Xyn9Xh7KX3gp+mQLftxiVIdR
TUCjmL4mSh0oevCLBQ+JK5ozhB6wwL0bvhqcwFuKMzX/ldyGLYGOp7wCM2jMqLwk
s1VBH47S+p+rrW4BR06syDqL1ZtAXxznUTq0VnTaLBNAyEfbAOYTHFvAr3DuUrXT
sD7BfKlISg91rndz802iYCoRkwyfJ5XTsEjIZk9kZTDeVjlQkqVB5516w4AT9ysk
vo9yGvvfGyqAuxjsqDgTMLC2VHJ8DCKRG1FjNPcvVLtatkwXtBh/LOzPVmL5h14=
=EBOU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------=_Part_34_1227848300.1416224045438--

mots

tags

participants (1)