Hello, isn't there an official major/minor numbering scheme for virtio disks? Sometimes I see 251 major or 252 or so... what is the udev assignment logic? Reading here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt 240-254 block LOCAL/EXPERIMENTAL USE Allocated for local/experimental use. For devices not assigned official numbers, these ranges should be used in order to avoid conflicting with future assignments. it seems they are in the range of experimental ones, while for example Xen /dev/xvdx devices have their own static assignment (202 major) Thanks, Gianluca _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/AEQB6H75QLY...

Hello, isn't there an official major/minor numbering scheme for virtio disks? Sometimes I see 251 major or 252 or so... what is the udev assignment logic? Reading here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt 240-254 block LOCAL/EXPERIMENTAL USE Allocated for local/experimental use. For devices not assigned official numbers, these ranges should be used in order to avoid conflicting with future assignments. it seems they are in the range of experimental ones, while for example Xen /dev/xvdx devices have their own static assignment (202 major)

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 09:53:31PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 5:55 PM Gianluca Cecchi > <gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > > Hello, > > isn't there an official major/minor numbering scheme for virtio disks? > > Sometimes I see 251 major or 252 or so... what is the udev assignment logic? > > Reading here: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/admin-guide/devices.txt > > > > 240-254 block LOCAL/EXPERIMENTAL USE > > Allocated for local/experimental use. For devices not > > assigned official numbers, these ranges should be > > used in order to avoid conflicting with future assignments. > > > > it seems they are in the range of experimental ones, while for example Xen /dev/xvdx devices have their own static assignment (202 major) No, the Linux virtio_blk driver does not use a static device major number. Regarding udev, on my Fedora system /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules has rules like this: KERNEL=="vd*[!0-9]", ATTRS{serial}=="?*", ENV{ID_SERIAL}="$attr{serial}", SYMLINK+="disk/by-id/virtio-$env{ID_SERIAL}" The rules match on the "vd*" name. If you are writing udev rules you could use the same approach. Is there a specific problem faced when there is no static device major number? Stefan