Best Openstack version to integrate with oVirt 4.2.7
Hello, do you think it is ok to use Rocky version of Openstack to integrate its services with oVirt 4.2.7 on CentOS 7? I see on https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/ that, if Rocky is too new, between the older releases available there are, from newer to older: Queens Pike Ocata Newton At the moment I have two separate lab environments: oVirt with 4.2.7 Openstack with Rocky (single host with packstack allinone) just trying first integration steps with these versions, it seems I'm not able to communicate with glance, because I get in engine.log 2018-11-10 17:32:58,386+01 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.storage.AbstractOpenStackStorageProviderProxy] (default task-51) [e2fccee7-1bb2-400f-b8d3-b87b679117d1] Not Found (OpenStack response error code: 404) Nothing in glance logs on openstack, apparently. In my test I'm using http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:9292 as provider url checked the authentication check box and glance user with its password 35357 as the port and services as the tenant a telnet on port 9292 of openstack server from engine to openstack is ok similar with cinder I get: 2018-11-10 17:45:42,226+01 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.storage.AbstractOpenStackStorageProviderProxy] (default task-50) [32a31aa7-fe3f-460c-a8b9-cc9b277deab7] Not Found (OpenStack response error code: 404) So before digging more I would lile to be certain which one is currently the best combination, possibly keeping as fixed the oVirt version to 4.2.7. Thanks, Gianluca
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 6:52 PM Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, do you think it is ok to use Rocky version of Openstack to integrate its services with oVirt 4.2.7 on CentOS 7? I see on https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/ that, if Rocky is too new, between the older releases available there are, from newer to older: Queens Pike Ocata Newton
Nobody working on oVirt is testing any release of Openstack in the recent years. The Cinder/Ceph support was released as tech preview in 3.6, and no work was done since then, and I think this will be deprecated soon. For 4.3 we are working on a different direction, using Cinderlib https://github.com/Akrog/cinderlib This is a way to use Cinder drivers without Openstack installation. The same library is used to provide Cinder based storage in Kubernetes. https://github.com/Akrog/ember-csi You can find an early draft here for this feature. Note that it is expected to be updated in the next weeks, but it can give you some idea on what we are working on. https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/blob/f88f38ebb9afff656ab68a2d60c2b3ae88c... This will be tested with some version of Cinder drivers. I guess we will have more info about it during 4.3 development. At the moment I have two separate lab environments:
oVirt with 4.2.7 Openstack with Rocky (single host with packstack allinone)
just trying first integration steps with these versions, it seems I'm not able to communicate with glance, because I get in engine.log 2018-11-10 17:32:58,386+01 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.storage.AbstractOpenStackStorageProviderProxy] (default task-51) [e2fccee7-1bb2-400f-b8d3-b87b679117d1] Not Found (OpenStack response error code: 404)
I think Glance support should work. Elad, which version of Glance was tested for 4.2? Regarding which Openstack version can work best with oVirt, maybe Openstack guys I added can give a better answer. Nir
Nothing in glance logs on openstack, apparently. In my test I'm using http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:9292 as provider url checked the authentication check box and glance user with its password 35357 as the port and services as the tenant
a telnet on port 9292 of openstack server from engine to openstack is ok
similar with cinder I get: 2018-11-10 17:45:42,226+01 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.storage.AbstractOpenStackStorageProviderProxy] (default task-50) [32a31aa7-fe3f-460c-a8b9-cc9b277deab7] Not Found (OpenStack response error code: 404)
So before digging more I would lile to be certain which one is currently the best combination, possibly keeping as fixed the oVirt version to 4.2.7.
Thanks, Gianluca _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/C46XG5YF3JTAT7...
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 3:50 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 6:52 PM Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, do you think it is ok to use Rocky version of Openstack to integrate its services with oVirt 4.2.7 on CentOS 7? I see on https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/ that, if Rocky is too new, between the older releases available there are, from newer to older: Queens Pike Ocata Newton
Nobody working on oVirt is testing any release of Openstack in the recent years.
Strange... I think oVirt is the natural platform to test features to have them on RHV if considered enterprise ready. And reading the downstream latest documentation for RHV 4.2 I see this regarding external providers: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm... And there is explicit reference to 1) Glance https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm... without any particular restriction described 2) Neutron https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm... with the note: " Important Red Hat Virtualization supports Red Hat OpenStack Platform versions 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 as external network providers. " BTW: the release cycles are here: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/openstack/platform 3) Cinder https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm... with the only note regarding Ceph as a provider for block storage to use with Cinder " Add an OpenStack Block Storage (Cinder) instance for storage management to the Red Hat Virtualization Manager. The OpenStack Cinder volumes are provisioned by Ceph Storage. " Coming back to oVirt 4.2.7 I see all of the 3 above providers present and referenced when I go and add external providers, so it doesn't seem to the final user/admin as an abandoned feature The Cinder/Ceph support was released as tech preview in 3.6, and no work was
done since then, and I think this will be deprecated soon.
Actually it seems yet a tech preview in latest 4.2, if the manual is correct (see link given above for Cinder)
For 4.3 we are working on a different direction, using Cinderlib https://github.com/Akrog/cinderlib
This is a way to use Cinder drivers without Openstack installation. The same library is used to provide Cinder based storage in Kubernetes. https://github.com/Akrog/ember-csi
You can find an early draft here for this feature. Note that it is expected to be updated in the next weeks, but it can give you some idea on what we are working on.
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/blob/f88f38ebb9afff656ab68a2d60c2b3ae88c...
This will be tested with some version of Cinder drivers. I guess we will have more info about it during 4.3 development.
I will go through reading them, thanks
At the moment I have two separate lab environments:
oVirt with 4.2.7 Openstack with Rocky (single host with packstack allinone)
just trying first integration steps with these versions, it seems I'm not able to communicate with glance, because I get in engine.log 2018-11-10 17:32:58,386+01 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.storage.AbstractOpenStackStorageProviderProxy] (default task-51) [e2fccee7-1bb2-400f-b8d3-b87b679117d1] Not Found (OpenStack response error code: 404)
I think Glance support should work. Elad, which version of Glance was tested for 4.2?
Based on the restrictions described for Neutron Provider above, I right deployed, always on CentOS 7.5 and using packstack allinone method, the oldest release I found a repo for at http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/ . That is Ocata (aka the base for OSP 11) and at least the glance connection works now out of the box, using the same parameters that dind't work with Rocky. 2018-11-11 17:52:46,320+01 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.network.SyncNetworkProviderCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-14) [4e83174] Running command: SyncNetworkProviderCommand internal: true. 2018-11-11 17:52:46,432+01 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.sso.utils.AuthenticationUtils] (default task-61) [] User admin@internal successfully logged in with scopes: ovirt-app-api ovirt-ext=token-info:authz-search ovirt-ext=token-info:public-authz-search ovirt-ext=token-info:validate ovirt-ext=token:password-access 2018-11-11 17:52:46,576+01 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.network.SyncNetworkProviderCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-14) [4e83174] Lock freed to object 'EngineLock:{exclusiveLocks='[0799c428-dc87-4ee4-900c-1ad3927dab6c=PROVIDER]', sharedLocks=''}' And I'm able to see the pre-created cirros glance image provided by the packstack installation in the added storage domain in oVirt: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1msHuY-3r9bgXV92PaU36dAa9Z37BXdDV/view?usp=s... Donna if a problem in configuration with packstack passing from Ocata to Rocky or any feature itself that changed with Rocky. I have both (Rocky server and Ocata server) and can compare them if it can be of any help to have Rocky working with oVirt 4.2.7
Regarding which Openstack version can work best with oVirt, maybe Openstack guys I added can give a better answer.
Nir
Thanks Nir. It would be of help to know cross relations and best combinations. In the mean time I'm going ahead with Ocata and see Neutron and Cinder providers behaviour. Gianluca
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 7:04 PM Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 3:50 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 6:52 PM Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, do you think it is ok to use Rocky version of Openstack to integrate its services with oVirt 4.2.7 on CentOS 7? I see on https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/ that, if Rocky is too new, between the older releases available there are, from newer to older: Queens Pike Ocata Newton
Nobody working on oVirt is testing any release of Openstack in the recent years.
Actually, Neutron and Glance are actively tested.
Strange... I think oVirt is the natural platform to test features to have them on RHV if considered enterprise ready. And reading the downstream latest documentation for RHV 4.2 I see this regarding external providers: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm...
And there is explicit reference to
1) Glance https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm... without any particular restriction described
2) Neutron https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm... with the note: " Important Red Hat Virtualization supports Red Hat OpenStack Platform versions 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 as external network providers. "
BTW: the release cycles are here: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/openstack/platform
3) Cinder https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm... with the only note regarding Ceph as a provider for block storage to use with Cinder " Add an OpenStack Block Storage (Cinder) instance for storage management to the Red Hat Virtualization Manager. The OpenStack Cinder volumes are provisioned by Ceph Storage. "
Coming back to oVirt 4.2.7 I see all of the 3 above providers present and referenced when I go and add external providers, so it doesn't seem to the final user/admin as an abandoned feature
The Cinder/Ceph support was released as tech preview in 3.6, and no work was done since then, and I think this will be deprecated soon.
Actually it seems yet a tech preview in latest 4.2, if the manual is correct (see link given above for Cinder)
For 4.3 we are working on a different direction, using Cinderlib https://github.com/Akrog/cinderlib
This is a way to use Cinder drivers without Openstack installation. The same library is used to provide Cinder based storage in Kubernetes. https://github.com/Akrog/ember-csi
You can find an early draft here for this feature. Note that it is expected to be updated in the next weeks, but it can give you some idea on what we are working on. https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/blob/f88f38ebb9afff656ab68a2d60c2b3ae88c...
This will be tested with some version of Cinder drivers. I guess we will have more info about it during 4.3 development.
I will go through reading them, thanks
At the moment I have two separate lab environments: oVirt with 4.2.7 Openstack with Rocky (single host with packstack allinone)
just trying first integration steps with these versions, it seems I'm not able to communicate with glance, because I get in engine.log 2018-11-10 17:32:58,386+01 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.storage.AbstractOpenStackStorageProviderProxy] (default task-51) [e2fccee7-1bb2-400f-b8d3-b87b679117d1] Not Found (OpenStack response error code: 404)
I think Glance support should work. Elad, which version of Glance was tested for 4.2?
Based on the restrictions described for Neutron Provider above, I right deployed, always on CentOS 7.5 and using packstack allinone method, the oldest release I found a repo for at http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/ . That is Ocata (aka the base for OSP 11) and at least the glance connection works now out of the box, using the same parameters that dind't work with Rocky.
2018-11-11 17:52:46,320+01 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.network.SyncNetworkProviderCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-14) [4e83174] Running command: SyncNetworkProviderCommand internal: true. 2018-11-11 17:52:46,432+01 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.sso.utils.AuthenticationUtils] (default task-61) [] User admin@internal successfully logged in with scopes: ovirt-app-api ovirt-ext=token-info:authz-search ovirt-ext=token-info:public-authz-search ovirt-ext=token-info:validate ovirt-ext=token:password-access 2018-11-11 17:52:46,576+01 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.network.SyncNetworkProviderCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-14) [4e83174] Lock freed to object 'EngineLock:{exclusiveLocks='[0799c428-dc87-4ee4-900c-1ad3927dab6c=PROVIDER]', sharedLocks=''}'
And I'm able to see the pre-created cirros glance image provided by the packstack installation in the added storage domain in oVirt: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1msHuY-3r9bgXV92PaU36dAa9Z37BXdDV/view?usp=s...
Donna if a problem in configuration with packstack passing from Ocata to Rocky or any feature itself that changed with Rocky. I have both (Rocky server and Ocata server) and can compare them if it can be of any help to have Rocky working with oVirt 4.2.7
Would you share your provider credentials? OpenStack dropped support for keystone v2, and in ovirt-4.2.7 we've introduced support for keystone v3. It smells related to your issue.
Regarding which Openstack version can work best with oVirt, maybe Openstack guys I added can give a better answer.
Nir
Thanks Nir. It would be of help to know cross relations and best combinations. In the mean time I'm going ahead with Ocata and see Neutron and Cinder providers behaviour.
Gianluca _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/TVH52LPLJT2BGT...
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:04:20 +0200 Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 7:04 PM Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 3:50 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 6:52 PM Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, do you think it is ok to use Rocky version of Openstack to integrate its services with oVirt 4.2.7 on CentOS 7? I see on https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/ that, if Rocky is too new, between the older releases available there are, from newer to older: Queens Pike Ocata Newton
Nobody working on oVirt is testing any release of Openstack in the recent years.
Actually, Neutron and Glance are actively tested.
Strange... I think oVirt is the natural platform to test features to have them on RHV if considered enterprise ready. And reading the downstream latest documentation for RHV 4.2 I see this regarding external providers: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm...
And there is explicit reference to
1) Glance https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm... without any particular restriction described
2) Neutron https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm... with the note: " Important Red Hat Virtualization supports Red Hat OpenStack Platform versions 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 as external network providers. "
BTW: the release cycles are here: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/openstack/platform
3) Cinder https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm... with the only note regarding Ceph as a provider for block storage to use with Cinder " Add an OpenStack Block Storage (Cinder) instance for storage management to the Red Hat Virtualization Manager. The OpenStack Cinder volumes are provisioned by Ceph Storage. "
Coming back to oVirt 4.2.7 I see all of the 3 above providers present and referenced when I go and add external providers, so it doesn't seem to the final user/admin as an abandoned feature
The Cinder/Ceph support was released as tech preview in 3.6, and no work was done since then, and I think this will be deprecated soon.
Actually it seems yet a tech preview in latest 4.2, if the manual is correct (see link given above for Cinder)
For 4.3 we are working on a different direction, using Cinderlib https://github.com/Akrog/cinderlib
This is a way to use Cinder drivers without Openstack installation. The same library is used to provide Cinder based storage in Kubernetes. https://github.com/Akrog/ember-csi
You can find an early draft here for this feature. Note that it is expected to be updated in the next weeks, but it can give you some idea on what we are working on. https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/blob/f88f38ebb9afff656ab68a2d60c2b3ae88c...
This will be tested with some version of Cinder drivers. I guess we will have more info about it during 4.3 development.
I will go through reading them, thanks
At the moment I have two separate lab environments: oVirt with 4.2.7 Openstack with Rocky (single host with packstack allinone)
just trying first integration steps with these versions, it seems I'm not able to communicate with glance, because I get in engine.log 2018-11-10 17:32:58,386+01 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.storage.AbstractOpenStackStorageProviderProxy] (default task-51) [e2fccee7-1bb2-400f-b8d3-b87b679117d1] Not Found (OpenStack response error code: 404)
I think Glance support should work. Elad, which version of Glance was tested for 4.2?
Based on the restrictions described for Neutron Provider above, I right deployed, always on CentOS 7.5 and using packstack allinone method, the oldest release I found a repo for at http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/ . That is Ocata (aka the base for OSP 11) and at least the glance connection works now out of the box, using the same parameters that dind't work with Rocky.
2018-11-11 17:52:46,320+01 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.network.SyncNetworkProviderCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-14) [4e83174] Running command: SyncNetworkProviderCommand internal: true. 2018-11-11 17:52:46,432+01 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.sso.utils.AuthenticationUtils] (default task-61) [] User admin@internal successfully logged in with scopes: ovirt-app-api ovirt-ext=token-info:authz-search ovirt-ext=token-info:public-authz-search ovirt-ext=token-info:validate ovirt-ext=token:password-access 2018-11-11 17:52:46,576+01 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.network.SyncNetworkProviderCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-14) [4e83174] Lock freed to object 'EngineLock:{exclusiveLocks='[0799c428-dc87-4ee4-900c-1ad3927dab6c=PROVIDER]', sharedLocks=''}'
And I'm able to see the pre-created cirros glance image provided by the packstack installation in the added storage domain in oVirt: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1msHuY-3r9bgXV92PaU36dAa9Z37BXdDV/view?usp=s...
Donna if a problem in configuration with packstack passing from Ocata to Rocky or any feature itself that changed with Rocky. I have both (Rocky server and Ocata server) and can compare them if it can be of any help to have Rocky working with oVirt 4.2.7
Would you share your provider credentials? OpenStack dropped support for keystone v2, and in ovirt-4.2.7 we've introduced support for keystone v3. It smells related to your issue.
Keystone v3 is only supported for oVirt's OpenStack Network Provider, not for storage providers. Please let us know, if you find any issues in using Neutron integration as external Network provider for oVirt. Please note, that for packstack's queens and rocky also the OVN layer 2 should work. In my simple packstack environment, even physnet worked. Please note that the oVirt's deployment of the Neutron provider on host does not work for queens and rocky. Best way to prevent that the deployment is triggered is to set no default network provider of the cluster.
Regarding which Openstack version can work best with oVirt, maybe Openstack guys I added can give a better answer.
Nir
Thanks Nir. It would be of help to know cross relations and best combinations. In the mean time I'm going ahead with Ocata and see Neutron and Cinder providers behaviour.
Gianluca _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/TVH52LPLJT2BGT...
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 6:07 PM Dominik Holler <dholler@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:04:20 +0200 Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
[snip]
Donna if a problem in configuration with packstack passing from Ocata to Rocky or any feature itself that changed with Rocky.
I have both (Rocky server and Ocata server) and can compare them if it can be of any help to have Rocky working with oVirt 4.2.7
Would you share your provider credentials? OpenStack dropped support for keystone v2, and in ovirt-4.2.7 we've introduced support for keystone v3. It smells related to your issue.
Keystone v3 is only supported for oVirt's OpenStack Network Provider, not for storage providers. Please let us know, if you find any issues in using Neutron integration as external Network provider for oVirt. Please note, that for packstack's queens and rocky also the OVN layer 2 should work. In my simple packstack environment, even physnet worked. Please note that the oVirt's deployment of the Neutron provider on host does not work for queens and rocky. Best way to prevent that the deployment is triggered is to set no default network provider of the cluster.
I see that when configuring "OpenStack Image" provider the authentication section contain "API Version" field greyed and pre-filled with "v2.0", so I cannot change it When trying to configure Openstack Neutron provider I can select "v2.0" or "v3" I don't find clear reference on how to manually configure the network node as a host. Is it sufficient to enable ovirt 4.2 repos and install vdsm-hook-openstacknet on it and then add it to the manager?
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:05:39 +0100 Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 6:07 PM Dominik Holler <dholler@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:04:20 +0200 Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
[snip]
Donna if a problem in configuration with packstack passing from Ocata to Rocky or any feature itself that changed with Rocky.
I have both (Rocky server and Ocata server) and can compare them if it can be of any help to have Rocky working with oVirt 4.2.7
Would you share your provider credentials? OpenStack dropped support for keystone v2, and in ovirt-4.2.7 we've introduced support for keystone v3. It smells related to your issue.
Keystone v3 is only supported for oVirt's OpenStack Network Provider, not for storage providers. Please let us know, if you find any issues in using Neutron integration as external Network provider for oVirt. Please note, that for packstack's queens and rocky also the OVN layer 2 should work. In my simple packstack environment, even physnet worked. Please note that the oVirt's deployment of the Neutron provider on host does not work for queens and rocky. Best way to prevent that the deployment is triggered is to set no default network provider of the cluster.
I see that when configuring "OpenStack Image" provider the authentication section contain "API Version" field greyed and pre-filled with "v2.0", so I cannot change it When trying to configure Openstack Neutron provider I can select "v2.0" or "v3"
I don't find clear reference on how to manually configure the network node as a host. Is it sufficient to enable ovirt 4.2 repos and install vdsm-hook-openstacknet on it and then add it to the manager?
for a packstack network host it is just: systemctl stop iptables yum install -y https://resources.ovirt.org/pub/yum-repo/ovirt-release42.rpm before adding the host in oVirt my full personal notes are at https://gitlab.com/snippets/1778319
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 6:04 PM Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 7:04 PM Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 3:50 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 6:52 PM Gianluca Cecchi <
gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, do you think it is ok to use Rocky version of Openstack to integrate
its services with oVirt 4.2.7 on CentOS 7?
I see on https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/ that, if Rocky is too new, between the older releases available there are, from newer to older: Queens Pike Ocata Newton
Nobody working on oVirt is testing any release of Openstack in the recent years.
Actually, Neutron and Glance are actively tested.
Right, when I wrote "Openstack" I meant "Cinder/Ceph".
Strange... I think oVirt is the natural platform to test features to
have them on RHV if considered enterprise ready.
And reading the downstream latest documentation for RHV 4.2 I see this regarding external providers:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm...
And there is explicit reference to
1) Glance
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm...
without any particular restriction described
2) Neutron
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm...
with the note: " Important Red Hat Virtualization supports Red Hat OpenStack Platform versions 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 as external network providers. "
BTW: the release cycles are here: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/openstack/platform
3) Cinder
with the only note regarding Ceph as a provider for block storage to use with Cinder " Add an OpenStack Block Storage (Cinder) instance for storage management to the Red Hat Virtualization Manager. The OpenStack Cinder volumes are
"
Coming back to oVirt 4.2.7 I see all of the 3 above providers present and referenced when I go and add external providers, so it doesn't seem to
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/htm... provisioned by Ceph Storage. the final user/admin as an abandoned feature
The Cinder/Ceph support was released as tech preview in 3.6, and no
done since then, and I think this will be deprecated soon.
Actually it seems yet a tech preview in latest 4.2, if the manual is correct (see link given above for Cinder)
For 4.3 we are working on a different direction, using Cinderlib https://github.com/Akrog/cinderlib
This is a way to use Cinder drivers without Openstack installation. The same library is used to provide Cinder based storage in Kubernetes. https://github.com/Akrog/ember-csi
You can find an early draft here for this feature. Note that it is
expected to be
updated in the next weeks, but it can give you some idea on what we are working on.
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/blob/f88f38ebb9afff656ab68a2d60c2b3ae88c...
This will be tested with some version of Cinder drivers. I guess we
will have
more info about it during 4.3 development.
I will go through reading them, thanks
At the moment I have two separate lab environments: oVirt with 4.2.7 Openstack with Rocky (single host with packstack allinone)
just trying first integration steps with these versions, it seems I'm
not able to communicate with glance, because I get in engine.log
2018-11-10 17:32:58,386+01 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.storage.AbstractOpenStackStorageProviderProxy] (default task-51) [e2fccee7-1bb2-400f-b8d3-b87b679117d1] Not Found (OpenStack response error code: 404)
I think Glance support should work. Elad, which version of Glance was tested for 4.2?
Based on the restrictions described for Neutron Provider above, I right deployed, always on CentOS 7.5 and using packstack allinone method, the
That is Ocata (aka the base for OSP 11) and at least the glance connection works now out of the box, using the same parameters that dind't work with Rocky.
2018-11-11 17:52:46,320+01 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.network.SyncNetworkProviderCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-14) [4e83174] Running command: SyncNetworkProviderCommand internal: true. 2018-11-11 17:52:46,432+01 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.sso.utils.AuthenticationUtils] (default task-61) [] User admin@internal successfully logged in with scopes: ovirt-app-api ovirt-ext=token-info:authz-search ovirt-ext=token-info:public-authz-search ovirt-ext=token-info:validate ovirt-ext=token:password-access 2018-11-11 17:52:46,576+01 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.network.SyncNetworkProviderCommand] (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-14) [4e83174] Lock freed to object 'EngineLock:{exclusiveLocks='[0799c428-dc87-4ee4-900c-1ad3927dab6c=PROVIDER]', sharedLocks=''}'
And I'm able to see the pre-created cirros glance image provided by the
work was oldest release I found a repo for at http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/ . packstack installation in the added storage domain in oVirt:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1msHuY-3r9bgXV92PaU36dAa9Z37BXdDV/view?usp=s...
Donna if a problem in configuration with packstack passing from Ocata to
Rocky or any feature itself that changed with Rocky.
I have both (Rocky server and Ocata server) and can compare them if it can be of any help to have Rocky working with oVirt 4.2.7
Would you share your provider credentials? OpenStack dropped support for keystone v2, and in ovirt-4.2.7 we've introduced support for keystone v3. It smells related to your issue.
Regarding which Openstack version can work best with oVirt, maybe Openstack guys I added can give a better answer.
Nir
Thanks Nir. It would be of help to know cross relations and best combinations. In the mean time I'm going ahead with Ocata and see Neutron and Cinder
providers behaviour.
Gianluca _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/TVH52LPLJT2BGT...
Hi, we are extensively using Ceph storage using the present OpenStack/Cinder integration in oVirt 4.2 which works for us. Openstack version in use is Pike. I already heard about the plan to move to cinderlib which sounds promising. I very much hope there will be a migration scenario for users of "full" Openstack/Cinder installations when upgrading to oVirt 4.3. thanks Matthias Am 11.11.18 um 15:49 schrieb Nir Soffer:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 6:52 PM Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com <mailto:gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello, do you think it is ok to use Rocky version of Openstack to integrate its services with oVirt 4.2.7 on CentOS 7? I see on https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/ that, if Rocky is too new, between the older releases available there are, from newer to older: Queens Pike Ocata Newton
Nobody working on oVirt is testing any release of Openstack in the recent years.
The Cinder/Ceph support was released as tech preview in 3.6, and no work was done since then, and I think this will be deprecated soon.
For 4.3 we are working on a different direction, using Cinderlib https://github.com/Akrog/cinderlib
This is a way to use Cinder drivers without Openstack installation. The same library is used to provide Cinder based storage in Kubernetes. https://github.com/Akrog/ember-csi
You can find an early draft here for this feature. Note that it is expected to be updated in the next weeks, but it can give you some idea on what we are working on. https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/blob/f88f38ebb9afff656ab68a2d60c2b3ae88c...
This will be tested with some version of Cinder drivers. I guess we will have more info about it during 4.3 development.
At the moment I have two separate lab environments: oVirt with 4.2.7 Openstack with Rocky (single host with packstack allinone)
just trying first integration steps with these versions, it seems I'm not able to communicate with glance, because I get in engine.log 2018-11-10 17:32:58,386+01 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.storage.AbstractOpenStackStorageProviderProxy] (default task-51) [e2fccee7-1bb2-400f-b8d3-b87b679117d1] Not Found (OpenStack response error code: 404)
I think Glance support should work. Elad, which version of Glance was tested for 4.2?
Regarding which Openstack version can work best with oVirt, maybe Openstack guys I added can give a better answer.
Nir
Nothing in glance logs on openstack, apparently. In my test I'm using http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:9292 as provider url checked the authentication check box and glance user with its password 35357 as the port and services as the tenant
a telnet on port 9292 of openstack server from engine to openstack is ok
similar with cinder I get: 2018-11-10 17:45:42,226+01 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.storage.AbstractOpenStackStorageProviderProxy] (default task-50) [32a31aa7-fe3f-460c-a8b9-cc9b277deab7] Not Found (OpenStack response error code: 404)
So before digging more I would lile to be certain which one is currently the best combination, possibly keeping as fixed the oVirt version to 4.2.7.
Thanks, Gianluca _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org <mailto:users-leave@ovirt.org> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/C46XG5YF3JTAT7...
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/ZPHSATIWZXFFPD...
-- Matthias Leopold IT Systems & Communications Medizinische Universität Wien Spitalgasse 23 / BT 88 /Ebene 00 A-1090 Wien Tel: +43 1 40160-21241 Fax: +43 1 40160-921200
Hi, we're also extensively using ceph via cinder on docker (Kolla project), but we're stuck on Pike for the missing keystone v3 support. While cinderlib is desirable and it's a good solution for simple uses, adding support for keystone v3 and keeping the native cinder interface would also be good, for cases where you already have an openstack infrastructure available and you want to manage a storage system from a single place. The other reason to keep the current solution, at least for now, is what Matthias is mentioning: the transition phases. How difficult it is to add the keystone v3 support for the storage side in ovirt, given you should already have the needed libs as you use them for the networking? Thanks, Alessandro Il 15/11/18 12:58, Matthias Leopold ha scritto:
Hi,
we are extensively using Ceph storage using the present OpenStack/Cinder integration in oVirt 4.2 which works for us. Openstack version in use is Pike.
I already heard about the plan to move to cinderlib which sounds promising. I very much hope there will be a migration scenario for users of "full" Openstack/Cinder installations when upgrading to oVirt 4.3.
thanks Matthias
Am 11.11.18 um 15:49 schrieb Nir Soffer:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 6:52 PM Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com <mailto:gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello, do you think it is ok to use Rocky version of Openstack to integrate its services with oVirt 4.2.7 on CentOS 7? I see on https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/ that, if Rocky is too new, between the older releases available there are, from newer to older: Queens Pike Ocata Newton
Nobody working on oVirt is testing any release of Openstack in the recent years.
The Cinder/Ceph support was released as tech preview in 3.6, and no work was done since then, and I think this will be deprecated soon.
For 4.3 we are working on a different direction, using Cinderlib https://github.com/Akrog/cinderlib
This is a way to use Cinder drivers without Openstack installation. The same library is used to provide Cinder based storage in Kubernetes. https://github.com/Akrog/ember-csi
You can find an early draft here for this feature. Note that it is expected to be updated in the next weeks, but it can give you some idea on what we are working on. https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/blob/f88f38ebb9afff656ab68a2d60c2b3ae88c...
This will be tested with some version of Cinder drivers. I guess we will have more info about it during 4.3 development.
At the moment I have two separate lab environments: oVirt with 4.2.7 Openstack with Rocky (single host with packstack allinone)
just trying first integration steps with these versions, it seems I'm not able to communicate with glance, because I get in engine.log 2018-11-10 17:32:58,386+01 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.storage.AbstractOpenStackStorageProviderProxy] (default task-51) [e2fccee7-1bb2-400f-b8d3-b87b679117d1] Not Found (OpenStack response error code: 404)
I think Glance support should work. Elad, which version of Glance was tested for 4.2?
Regarding which Openstack version can work best with oVirt, maybe Openstack guys I added can give a better answer.
Nir
Nothing in glance logs on openstack, apparently. In my test I'm using http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:9292 as provider url checked the authentication check box and glance user with its password 35357 as the port and services as the tenant
a telnet on port 9292 of openstack server from engine to openstack is ok
similar with cinder I get: 2018-11-10 17:45:42,226+01 ERROR [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.storage.AbstractOpenStackStorageProviderProxy] (default task-50) [32a31aa7-fe3f-460c-a8b9-cc9b277deab7] Not Found (OpenStack response error code: 404)
So before digging more I would lile to be certain which one is currently the best combination, possibly keeping as fixed the oVirt version to 4.2.7.
Thanks, Gianluca _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org <mailto:users-leave@ovirt.org> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/C46XG5YF3JTAT7...
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/ZPHSATIWZXFFPD...
participants (6)
-
Alessandro De Salvo -
Dan Kenigsberg -
Dominik Holler -
Gianluca Cecchi -
Matthias Leopold -
Nir Soffer