1:09 a.m.
--_000_a584ee1c0d4e40a2ae295cf23111628bDM2PR05MB320namprd05pro_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos hosts.
One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use. At the =
time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error. It is now just a warning=
, so it does not prevent installing a host. But, as a warning, a lot of pe=
ople are probably missing it.
When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a "rhs-virt=
ualization" profile. That profile is not included in Centos. I substitute=
d the "virtual-host" profile.
I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla 987293<http=
s://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D987293>;, where "rhs-virtualizatio=
n" was substituted for "virtual-host" for RHEV + RHS. I am guessing that
w=
hatever is used as a switch to determine RHEV + RHS is also shoving Centos =
into that same path, which is not appropriate.
My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses "rhs-virtualizat=
ion" when present, and if it is not present, then it falls back to "virtual=
-host". (I don't know what (if any) differences there are between the two =
profiles.)
Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other path?
Ted Miller
--_000_a584ee1c0d4e40a2ae295cf23111628bDM2PR05MB320namprd05pro_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html <head <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type"
content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"=
<style style=3D"display: none;"
id=3D"owaParaStyle" type=3D"text/css"><!--P=
{margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}--></style
</head <body tabindex=3D"0"
aria-label=3D"Message body" fpstyle=3D"1" dir=3D"ltr" <div name=3D"divtagdefaultwrapper"
id=3D"divtagdefaultwrapper" style=3D"fon=
t-family: Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #0000=
00; margin: 0" I posted a script (a while back) to
get oVirt running on Centos hosts.<br
<br One of the items in it has to do
with what "tuned" profile to use=
. At the time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error. It i=
s now just a warning, so it does not prevent installing a host. But, =
as a warning, a lot of people are probably missing it.<br
<br When using Centos 6 as the host OS,
the script tries to install a "rhs=
-virtualization" profile. That profile is not included in Centos=
. I substituted the "virtual-host" profile.<br <br I believe that this may be a
regression as a result of Bugzilla <a href=3D"=
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D987293"
<b>987293</b></a>, where "rhs-virtualization"
was substituted for=
"virtual-host" for RHEV + RHS. I am guessing that
what=
ever is used as a switch to determine RHEV + RHS is also shoving Centos=
into that same path, which is not appropriate.<br
<br My suggestion would be to write the
script so that it uses "rhs-virtua=
lization" when present, and if it is not present, then it falls back t=
o "virtual-host". (I don't know what (if any) differences
t=
here are between the two profiles.)<br
<br Should I open a new bug, make a
comment on 987293, or take some other path?=
<br <br Ted Miller<br <br </div </body
</html
--_000_a584ee1c0d4e40a2ae295cf23111628bDM2PR05MB320namprd05pro_--
11:02 a.m.
I did not run into this problem at all ( neither on my cos6.4 nor on
my 6.5 hosts ).
The "virtual-host" profile was chosen automatically, installation of
vdsm was literally
as simple as adding the following lines in the %post section of my
kickstart file:
rpm -ivh http://ovirt.org/releases/ovirt-release-el.noarch.rpm
rpm -ivh http://mirror.1000mbps.com/fedora-epel/6/i386/epel-release-6-8.noarch.rpm
yum -y update epel-release
yum -y install vdsm
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Ted Miller <tmiller(a)hcjb.org> wrote:
I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos
hosts.
One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use. At the
time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error. It is now just a warning,
so it does not prevent installing a host. But, as a warning, a lot of
people are probably missing it.
When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a
"rhs-virtualization" profile. That profile is not included in Centos. I
substituted the "virtual-host" profile.
I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla 987293,
where "rhs-virtualization" was substituted for "virtual-host" for
RHEV +
RHS. I am guessing that whatever is used as a switch to determine RHEV +
RHS is also shoving Centos into that same path, which is not appropriate.
My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses
"rhs-virtualization" when present, and if it is not present, then it falls
back to "virtual-host". (I don't know what (if any) differences there are
between the two profiles.)
Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other path?
Ted Miller
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
3971
days inactive
3973
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Sander Grendelman -
Ted Miller